Visuo-proprioceptive interactions during adaptation of the human reach

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 868-887

  Judkins, Timothy ^a   Scheidt, Robert A ^a,b,c  

^a Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Learning; Memory; Multisensory integration; Prediction

Indexed keywords

LEARNING; MEMORY; MULTISENSORY INTEGRATION; PREDICTION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR SKILLS; PROPRIOCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84894041386     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00314.2012     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Amans MR, Lillis KP, Scheidt RA. Compensation for the passive dynamics of a five-bar neurorehabilitation robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE EMBS/BMES Society Meeting, Houston, TX. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE EMBS, 2002.
2. Bach-y-Rita P, Collins CC, Saunders FA, White B, Scadden L. Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature 221: 963-964, 1969.
3. Bach-y-Rita P, Kercel SW. Sensory substitution and the human-machine interface. Trends Cogn Sci 7: 541-546, 2003.
4. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ. The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp Brain Res 122: 367-377, 1998.
5. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: an experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 81: 1355-1364, 1999.
6. van Beers RJ, Baraduc P, Wolpert DM. Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357: 1137-1145, 2002a.
7. van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P. When feeling is more important to seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol 12: 834-837, 2002b.
8. Berniker M, Koerding KP. Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization. Nat Neurosci 11: 1454-1461, 2008.
9. Bock O. Load compensation in human goal-directed arm movements. Behav Brain Res 41: 167-177, 1990.
10. Burge J, Ernst MO, Banks MS. The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. J Vis 8: 1-19, 2008.
11. Carine M, Pisella L, Prablanc C, Rode G, Rossetti Y. Enhancing visuomotor adaptation by reducing error signals: single-step (aware) versus multiple-step (unaware) exposure to wedge prisms. J Cogn Neurosci 19: 341-350, 2007.
12. Carmena JM, Lebedev MA, Crist RE, O'Doherty JE, Santucci DM, Dimitrov DF, Patil PG, Henriquez CS, Nicolelis MAL. Learning to control a brain-machine interface for reaching and grasping by primates. PLoS Biol 1: 193-208, 2003.
13. Chen Y, Huang H, Xu W, Wallis RI, Sundaram H, Rikakis T, Ingalls T, Olson L, He J. The design of a real-time, multimodal biofeedback system for stroke patient rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. New York: ACM, 2006.
14. Deneve S, Duhamel JR, Pouget A. Optimal sensorimotor integration in recurrent cortical networks: a neural implementation of Kalman filters. J Neurosci 27: 5744-5756, 2007.
15. Dijkerman HC, de Haan EHF. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behav Brain Sci 30: 189-239, 2007.
16. Dingwell JB, Mah CD, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom: evidence for model-based control. J Neurophysiol 88: 222-235, 2002.
17. Dizio P, Lackner JR. Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. J Neurophysiol 74: 1787-1792, 1995.
18. Dizio P, Lackner JR. Congenitally blind individuals rapidly adapt to Coriolis force perturbations of their reaching movements. J Neurophysiol 84: 2175-2180, 2000.
19. Donchin O, Francis JT, Shadmehr R. Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiment in human motor control. J Neurosci 23: 9032-9045, 2003.
20. Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433, 2002.
21. Fine MS, Thoroughman KA. Motor adaptation to single force pulses: sensitive to direction but insensitive to within-movement pulse placement and magnitude. J Neurophysiol 96: 710-720, 2006.
22. Fishbach A, Roy SA, Bastianen C, Miller LE, Houk JC. Kinematic properties of on-line error corrections in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 164: 442-457, 2005.
23. Franklin DW, So U, Burdet E, Kawato M. Visual feedback is not necessary for the learning of novel dynamics. PLoS One 2: e1336, 2007.
24. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM, Jordan MI. Computational models of sensorimotor integration. In: Self-Organization, Computational Maps and Motor Control, edited by Morasso PG and Sanguineti V. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1997, p. 117-147.
25. Ghez C, Gordon J. Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. I. Role of opposing muscles. Exp Brain Res 67: 225-240, 1987.
26. Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF. Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. II. Effects of visual information on accuracy. J Neurophysiol 73: 361-372, 1995.
27. Ghez C, Krakauer JW, Sainburg RL, Ghilardi MF. Spatial representations and internal models of limb dynamics in motor learning. In: The New Cognitive Neurosciences (2nd Ed.), edited by Gazzaniga MS. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1999, p. 501-514.
28. Ghez C, Rikakis T, DuBois RL, Cook PR. An auditory display system for aiding interjoint coordination. Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Displays (ICAD), Atlanta, Georgia. Nashua, NH: ICAD, 2000.
29. Ghez C, Scheidt RA, Heijink H. Different learned coordinate frames for planning trajectories and final positions in reaching. J Neurophysiol 98: 3614-3626, 2007.
30. Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15: 20-25, 1992.
31. Gordon J, Ghez C. EMG patterns in antagonist muscles during isometric controactions in man: relations to response dynamics. Exp Brain Res 55: 167-171, 1984.
32. Hallett M, Shahani BT, Young RR. EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38: 1154-1162, 1975.
33. Haruno M, Wolpert DM, Kawato M. MOSAIC model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput 13: 2201-2220, 2001.
34. Haswell TM, Scheidt RA. Does motor adaptation depend on the statistical properties of the environment? Program No. 742. 22/T19. In: 2006 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. Atlanta, GA: Society for Neuroscience, 2006.
35. Hatada Y, Miall RC, Rossetti Y. Two waves of a long-lasting aftereffect of prism adaptation measured over 7 days. Exp Brain Res 169: 417-426, 2006.
36. Humphrey DR, Reed DF. Separate cortical systems for control of joint movement and joint stiffness: reciprocal activation and coactivation of antagonist muscles. In: Motor Control Mechanisms in Health and Disease, edited by Desmedt JE. New York: Raven, 1983, p. 347-372.
37. Hwang EJ, Donchin O, Smith MA, Shadmehr R. A gain-field encoding of limb position and velocity in the internal model of arm dynamics. PLoS Biol 1: E25, 2003.
38. Judkins TN, Scheidt RA. Sensory coherence and memory-based motor adaptation. Program No. 386. 20. In: 2003 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. New Orleans, LA: Society for Neuroscience, 2003.
39. Klassen J, Tong C, Flanagan JR. Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations. Exp Brain Res 164: 250-259, 2005.
40. Koerding KP, Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427: 244-247, 2004.
41. Korenberg AT, Ghahramani Z. A Bayesian view of motor adaptation. Curr Psychol Cogn 21: 537-564, 2002.
42. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2: 1026-1031, 1999.
43. Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20: 8916-8924, 2000.
44. Lackner JR, Dizio P. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol 72: 299-313, 1994.
45. Lajoie Y, Paillard J, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M, Forget R, Lamarre Y. Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal sbjects: visuoproprioceptive conflict. Neurology 42: 1104-1106, 1992.
46. Latash M, Scholz J, Schoner G. Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30: 26-31, 2002.
47. Lee JY, Schweighofer N. Dual adaptation supports a parallel architecture of motor memory. J Neurosci 29: 10396-10404, 2009.
48. Liu X, Mosier KM, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Casadio M, Scheidt RA. Reorganization of finger coordination patterns during adaptation to rotation and scaling of a newly-learned sensorimotor transformation. J Neurophysiol 105: 454-473, 2011.
49. Ljung L. System Identification-Theory for the User (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.
50. Magescas F, Prablanc C. Automatic drive of lib motor plasticity. J Cogn Neurosci 18: 75-83, 2006.
51. Marko MK, Haith AM, Harran MD, Shadmehr R. Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation. J Neurophysiol 108: 1752-1763, 2012.
52. Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci 26: 3642-3645, 2006.
53. Milner TE. A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision. Neuroscience 49: 487-496, 1992.
54. Minsky M. The Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1985.
55. Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW. Discrete-Time Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989.
56. Paillard J, Brouchon M. Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In: The Neuropsychology of Spatially Oriented Behavior, edited by Freedman SJ. Homewood, IL: Dorsey, 1968, p. 37-56.
57. Pine ZM, Krakauer JW, Gordon J, Ghez C. Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. Neuroreport 7: 2357-2361, 1996.
58. Pipereit K, Bock O, Vercher JL. The contribution of proprioceptive feedback to sensorimotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 174: 45-52, 2006.
59. Prochazka A. Proprioceptive feedback and movement regulation. In: Handbook of Physiology. Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1996, sect. 12, chapt. 3, p. 89-127.
60. Pruszynski JA, Kurtzer I, Scott SH. Rapid motor responses are appropriately tuned to the metrics of a visuospatial task. J Neurophysiol 100: 224-238, 2008.
61. Redding GM, Rader SD, Lucas DR. Cognitive load and prism adaptation. J Mot Behav 24: 238-246, 1992.
62. Redding GM, Wallace B. Adaptive coordination and alignment of eye and hand. J Mot Behav 25: 75-88, 1993.
63. Redding GM, Wallace B. Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22: 379-394, 1996.
64. Redding GM, Wallace B. Strategic calibration and spatial alignment: a model from prism adaptation. J Mot Behav 34: 126-138, 2002.
65. Reuschel J, Drewing K, Henriques DYP, Rosler F, Fiehler K. Optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive movement information for the perception of trajectory geometry. Exp Brain Res 201: 853-862, 2010.
66. Sainburg RL, Ghez C, Kalakanis D. Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 81: 1045-1056, 1999.
67. Sainburg RL, Ghilardi MF, Poizner H, Ghez C. Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. J Neurophysiol 73: 820-835, 1995.
68. Scheidt RA. A vector-ARX model of motor adaptation during reaching. In: 2004 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. San Diego, CA: Society for Neuroscience, 2004.
69. Scheidt RA. Uncertainty in the limits of visual depth perception. Program No. 163. 17/LL1. In: 2013 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. San Diego, CA: Society for Neuroscience, 2013.
70. Scheidt RA, Conditt MA, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. J Neurophysiol 84: 853-862, 2000.
71. Scheidt RA, Conditt MA, Secco EL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. J Neurophysiol 93: 3200-13, 2005.
72. Scheidt RA, Dingwell JB, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Learning to move amid uncertainty. J Neurophysiol 86: 971-985, 2001.
73. Scheidt RA, Ghez C. Separate adaptive mechanisms for controlling trajectory and final position in reaching. J Neurophysiol 98: 3600-3613, 2007.
74. Scheidt RA, Ghez C, Asnani S. Patterns of hypermetria and terminal co-contraction during point-to-point movements demonstrate independent action of trajectory and postural controllers. J Neurophysiol 106: 2368-2382, 2011.
75. Scheidt RA, Lillis KP, Emerson SJ. Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive discrimination between straight and curved hand paths in reaching. Exp Brain Res 204: 239-254, 2010.
76. Scheidt RA, Mah CD. Feedforward control of virtual (isometric) reaching. In: Society for Neuroscience Meeting Planner. Program No. 822. 8. New Orleans, LA: Society for Neuroscience, 2003.
77. Scheidt RA, Stoeckmann T. Reach adaptation and final position control amid environmental uncertainty following stroke. J Neurophysiol 97: 2824-2836, 2007.
78. Scheidt RA, Zimbelman JL, Salowitz NMG, Suminski AJ, Mosier KM, Houk J, Simo L. Remembering forward: neural correlates of memory and prediction in human motor adaptation. NeuroImage 59: 582-600, 2012.
79. Scholz J, Schoner G. The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126: 289-306, 1999.
80. Shabbott B, Ravindran R, Schumacher JW, Wasserman PB, Marder KS, Mazzoni P. Learning fast accurate movements requires intact frontostriatal circuits. Front Hum Neurosci 7: 752, 2013.
81. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
82. Sing GC, Joiner WM, Nanayakkara T, Brayanov JB, Smith MA. Primitives for motor adaptation reflect correlated neural tuning to position and velocity. Neuron 64: 575-589, 2009.
83. Smeets JB, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, de Grave DD, van Beers RJ, Brenner E. Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 18781-18786, 2006.
84. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R. Interacting adaptive processes with different time-scales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4: e179, 2006.
85. Takahashi CD, Scheidt RA, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment. J Neurophysiol 86: 1047-1051, 2001.
86. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407: 742-747, 2000.
87. Tong C, Wolpert DM, Flannagan JR. Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study. J Neurosci 22: 1108-1113, 2002.
88. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226-1235, 2002.
89. Tseng Y, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol 98: 54-62, 2007.
90. Wang J, Sainburg RL. Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remap movement vectors, not final positions. J Neurosci 25: 4024-4030, 2005.
91. Wann JP, Ibrahim SF. Does limb proprioception drift? Exp Brain Res 98: 153-156, 1992.
92. Weeks DL, Aubert MP, Feldman AG, Levin MF. One-trial adaptation of movement to changes in load. J Neurophysiol 75: 60-74, 1996.
93. Wei K, Koerding K. Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? J Neurophysiol 101: 655-664, 2009.
94. Welch RB, Choe CS, Heinrich DR. Evidence for a three-component model of prism adaptation. J Exp Psychol 103: 700-705, 1974.
95. Wolpert DM, Mial RC, Kawato M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci 2: 338-347, 1998.