Conventional radiography and cross-sectional imaging when planning dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible to support an overdenture: A systematic review

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Shelley, A M ^a,b   Glenny, A M ^c   Goodwin, M ^c   Brunton, P ^b   Horner, K ^c  

^a Dental Practice   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Comparison systematic review; Dental implant; Radiography

Indexed keywords

COMPARISON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; OVERLAY DENTURE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COMPARISON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; DENTAL IMPLANT; RADIOGRAPHY;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, OVERLAY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84893824696     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130321     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Muller F, Naert I, et al. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients-the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J 2009; 207: 185-6. doi: 10.1038/sj. bdj.2009.728
2. Chee W, Jivraj S. Treatment planning of the edentulous mandible. Br Dent J 2006; 201: 337-47. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4814041 (Pubitemid 44465206)
3. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2002; 19: 3-4.
4. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1985.
5. Kalpidis CD, Setayesh RM. Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: a review of the literature. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 631-45. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.5.631 (Pubitemid 38811852)
6. Boyes-Varley JG, Lownie JF. Haematoma of the floor of the mouth following implant placement. SADJ 2002; 57: 64-5.
7. Darriba MA, Mendonca-Caridad JJ. Profuse bleeding and lifethreatening airway obstruction after placement of mandibular dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55: 1328-30. (Pubitemid 27495067)
8. Del Castillo-Pardo de Vera JL, Lopez-Arcas Calleja JM, Burgueno-Garcia M. Hematoma of the floor of the mouth and airway obstruction during mandibular dental implant placement: a case report. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 12: 223-6. doi: 10.1007/s10006-008-0134-4
9. Flanagan D. Important arterial supply of the mandible, control of an arterial hemorrhage, and report of a hemorrhagic incident. J Oral Implantol 2003; 29: 165-73. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2003) 029,0165:IASOTM.2.3.CO;2
10. Givol N, Chaushu G, Halamish-Shani T, Taicher S. Emergency tracheostomy following life-threatening hemorrhage in the floor of the mouth during immediate implant placement in the mandibular canine region. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 1893-5. (Pubitemid 33601027)
11. Isaacson TJ. Sublingual hematoma formation during immediate placement of mandibular endosseous implants. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135: 168-72. (Pubitemid 38264663)
12. Kalpidis CD, Konstantinidis AB. Critical hemorrhage in the floor of the mouth during implant placement in the first mandibular premolar position: a case report. Implant Dent 2005; 14: 117-24. (Pubitemid 40905323)
13. Krenkel C, Holzner K. Lingual bone perforation as causal factor in a threatening hemorrhage of the mouth floor due to a single tooth implant in the canine region. [In German.] Quintessenz 1986; 37: 1003-8.
14. Laboda G. Life-threatening hemorrhage after placement of an endosseous implant: report of case. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 121: 599-600.
15. Mason ME, Triplett RG, Alfonso WF. Life-threatening hemorrhage from placement of a dental implant. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48: 201-4. (Pubitemid 20053181)
16. Mordenfeld A, Andersson L, Bergstrom B. Hemorrhage in the floor of the mouth during implant placement in the edentulous mandible: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 558-61. (Pubitemid 127500410)
17. Niamtu J, 3rd. Near-fatal airway obstruction after routine implant placement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92: 597-600. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.116503 (Pubitemid 33601770)
18. Panula K, Oikarinen K. Severe hemorrhage after implant surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 87: 2.
19. Pigadas N, Simoes P, Tuffin JR. Massive sublingual haematoma following osseo-integrated implant placement in the anterior mandible. Br Dent J 2009; 206: 67-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.2
20. Ratschew C, Czernicky W, Watzek G. Lebensbedrochliche Blutung nach Implantation im Unterkiefer. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1994; 49: 65-7.
21. ten Bruggenkate CM, Krekeler G, Kraaijenhagen HA, Foitzik C, Oosterbeek HS. Hemorrhage of the floor of the mouth resulting from lingual perforation during implant placement: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 329-34.
22. Weibrich G, Foitzik Ch, Kuffner H. Life threatening oral hemorrhage after implantation into the distal right mandible. [In German.] Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2002; 6: 442-5. doi: 10.1007/s10006-002-0411-6
23. Woo BM, Al-Bustani S, Ueeck BA. Floor of mouth haemorrhage and life-threatening airway obstruction during immediate implant placement in the anterior mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35: 961-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.020 (Pubitemid 44542550)
24. Hofschneider U, Tepper G, Gahleitner A, Ulm C. Assessment of the blood supply to the mental region for reduction of bleeding complications during implant surgery in the interforaminal region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 379-83.
25. Longoni S, Sartori M, Braun M, Bravetti P, Lapi A, Baldoni M, et al. Lingual vascular canals of the mandible: the risk of bleeding complications during implant procedures. Implant Dent 2007; 16: 131-8. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31805009d5
26. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 113: 817-26. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.005
27. Shelley A, Horner K. A transymphyseal X-ray projection to assess the anterior edentulous mandible prior to implant placement. Dent Update 2008; 35: 689-94.
28. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK. Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework. Clinical Radiol 1995; 50: 513-18.
29. Ramlaul A, Hogg P. Medical imaging and radiotherapy research: skills and strategies. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2010.
30. Fineberg HV. Evaluation of computed tomography: achievement and challenge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978; 131: 1-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.131.1.1 (Pubitemid 8368531)
31. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991; 11: 88-94.
32. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 150-7. doi: 10.2319/122407-599.1
33. Guerrero ME, Shahbazian M, Elsiena Bekkering G, Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Horner K. The diagnostic efficacy of cone beam CT for impacted teeth and associated features: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38: 208-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02141.x
34. Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 18-22. (Pubitemid 351211972)
35. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 410-16. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/20987648 (Pubitemid 44904797)
36. Ribeiro-Rotta RF, Lindh C, Rohlin M. Efficacy of clinical methods to assess jawbone tissue prior to and during endosseous dental implant placement: a systematic literature review. The Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 289-300.
37. Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 67-75. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/27546065
38. Diniz AF, Mendonca EF, Leles CR, Guilherme AS, Cavalcante MP, Silva MA. Changes in the pre-surgical treatment planning using conventional spiral tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 249-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501. 2007.01475.x
39. Fortin T, Camby E, Alik M, Isidori M, Bouchet H. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15: 198-204.
40. Frei C, Buser D, Dula K. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 490-7. (Pubitemid 40115777)
41. Reddy MS,Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5: 229-38.
42. Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 424-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02006.x
43. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L. Impact of conventional tomography on prediction of the appropriate implant size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92: 458-63. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.118286 (Pubitemid 33601747)
44. Chen LC, Lundgren T, Hallstrom H, Cherel F. Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 401-5. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070021
45. Dreiseidler T, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Zoller JE. Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 216-25.
46. Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Naert I, Quirynen M, Hermans R, Van Steenberghe D. Predictability of reformatted computed tomography for pre-operative planning of endosseous implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 37-41. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600403
47. Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 105-11. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600419
48. Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13: 375-81. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0257-5
49. Vazquez L, Saulacic N, Belser U, Bernard JP. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 81-5.
50. Webber RL, Messura JK. An in vivo comparison of diagnostic information obtained from tuned-aperture computed tomography and conventional dental radiographic imaging modalities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 239-47.
51. American Dental Association. The selection of patients for dental radiographic examinations. Chicago, IL: American Dental Association, 2004.
52. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent 2012; 21: 78-86. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824885b5
53. FGDP(UK). Selection criteria in dental radiography. 2nd edn. London: Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK) Royal College of Surgeons of England; 2004.
54. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, Grondahl K, Harris D, Jacobs R, et al. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 566-70. (Pubitemid 41713085)
55. Harris D, Horner K, Gr̈ondahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic GI, et al. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A concensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1243-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02441.x
56. Health Protection Agency. Guidance on the safe use of dental cone beam CT equipment. Chilton, UK: Health Protection Agency; 2010.
57. European Commission. Radiation protection 136. European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2004.
58. European Commission. Radiation protection 172. Evidence based guidelines on cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2012.
59. Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 187-95.
60. National Radiological Protection Board. Guidance notes for dental practitioners on the safe use of X-ray equipment. Chilton, UK: National Radiological Protection Board; 2001.
61. Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 630-7.
62. Berlin JA. Does blinding of readers affect the results of metaanalyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group. Lancet 1997; 350: 185-6. (Pubitemid 27303630)
63. Haines T, Kennedy C, Gross A, Goldsmith C, Hondras M, Roving I. Influence of "blinding" on selection of articles for relevance. In: 7th Cochrane Colloquium; Rome, Italy, 1999.
64. Albon E, Tsourapas A, Frew E, Davenport C, Oyebode F, Bayliss S, et al. Structural neuroimaging in psychosis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment 2008; 12: iii-iv, ix-163.
65. Meads CA, Davenport CF. Quality assessment of diagnostic before-after studies: development of methodology in the context of a systematic review. BMC Med Res Method 2009; 9: 3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-3
66. Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). What study designs should be included in an EPOC review and what should they be called? In: EPOC Resources for review authors. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2013. Available at: http://epocoslo.cochrane.org/epoc-specific- resourcesreview-authors
67. Reeves BC, Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Wells GA. Chapter 13: including non-randomised studies. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
68. Ioannidis JP, Haidich AB, Pappa M, Pantazis N, Kokori SI, Tektonidou MG, et al. Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies. JAMA 2001; 286: 821-30. (Pubitemid 33015576)