Treatment planning of the edentulous mandible

British Dental Journal

Volumn 201, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 337-347

  Chee, Winston ^a,b,c   Jivraj, S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of Southern California ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749070591     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: 17417503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4814041     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Zarb G A. The edentulous milieu. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 825-831.
2. Zitzmann N U, Marinello CP. A review of clinical and technical considerations for fixed and removable implant prostheses in the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 65-72.
3. Feine J S, Carlsson G E, Awad M A et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2002; 19: 3-4.
4. Gotfredsen K, Holm B. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 125-130.
5. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Castagna S. Mandibular overdentures anchored to single implants: a five-year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 159-165.
6. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 170-177.
7. Chee W W. Considerations for implant overdentures. J Calif Dent Assoc 1992; 20: 25-28.
8. Zitzmann N U, Sendi P, Marinello C P. An economic evaluation of implant treatment in edentulous patients-preliminary results. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 20-27.
9. Takanashi Y, Penrod J R, Lund J P, Feine JS. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 181-186.
10. Thomason J M, Lund J P, Chehade A, Feine J S. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures six months after delivery. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 467-473.
11. Awad M A, Lund J P, Shapiro S H et al. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 390-396.
12. Melas F, Marcenes W, Wright P. Oral health impact on daily performance in patients with implant-stabilized overdentures and patients with conventional complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 700-712.
13. Heydecke G, Locker D, Awad M A et al. Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31: 161-168.
14. Awad M A, Lund J P, Dufresne E, Feine J S. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 117-122.
15. Morais J A, Heydecke G, Pawliuk J et al. The effects of mandibular two-implant overdentures on nutrition in elderly edentulous individuals. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 53-58.
16. Attard N J, Zarb G A. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant overdentures: the Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 425-433.
17. Chaffee N R, Felton D A, Cooper L F et al. Prosthetic complications in an implant-retained mandibular overdenture population: initial analysis of a prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 40-44.
18. Payne A G, Walton T R, Walton J N, Solomons Y F. The outcome of implant overdentures from a prosthodontic perspective: proposal for a classification protocol. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 27-32.
19. Walton J N, MacEntee M I. Problems with prostheses on implants: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 283-288.
20. Payne A G, Solomons Y F. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with three different attachment systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 246-253
21. Attard N J, Zarb G A, Laporte A. Long-term treatment costs associated with implant-supported mandibular prostheses in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 117-123.
22. Thiel C P, Evans D B, Burnett R R. Combination syndrome associated with a mandibular implant-supported overdenture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 107-113.
23. Lechner S K, Mammen A. Combination syndrome in relation to osseointegrated implant-supported overdentures: a survey. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 58-64.
24. Jacobs R, Schotte A, van Steenberghe D et al. Posterior jaw bone resorption in osseointegrated implant- supported overdentures. Clin Oral Impl Res 1992; 3: 63-70.
25. Narhi T O, Geertman M E, Hevinga M et al. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 43-49.
26. Chiapasco M, Gatti C. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: a 3- to 8-year prospective study on 328 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 29-38.
27. Payne A G, Tawse-Smith A, Thompson W M, Kumara R. Early functional loading of unsplinted roughened surface implants with mandibular overdentures 2 weeks after surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 143-153.
28. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U et al. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 347-359.
29. Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S, Grippaudo G. A long-term follow-up study of non-submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Part I: Ten-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 1286 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 260-273.
30. Attard N J, Zarb G A. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant-fixed prostheses: the Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 417-424.
31. Zitzmann N U, Sendi P, Marinello C P. An economic evaluation of implant treatment in edentulous patients-preliminary results. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 20-27.
32. Becker W, Becker B E, Huffstetlert S. Early functional loading at 5 days for Branemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 695-702.
33. Schnitman P A, Wohrle P S, Rubenstein J E et al. Ten-year results for Branemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prostheses at implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 495-503.
34. Balshi T J, Wolfinger G J. Immediate loading of Branemark implants in edentulous mandibles: a preliminary report. Implant Dent 1997.
35. Chee W, Jivraj S. Efficiency of immediately loaded mandibular full-arch implant restorations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 52-56.
36. Tarnow D P, Emtiaz S, Classi A. Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: ten consecutive case reports with 1- to 5-year data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 319-324.
37. Randow K, Ericsson I, Nilner K et al. Immediate functional loading of Branemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 8-15.
38. English C E. Critical A-P spread. Implant Soc 1990; 1: 2-3.
39. McAlarney M E, Stavropoulos D N. Theoretical cantilever lengths versus clinical variables in fifty-five clinical cases. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 332-343.
40. McAlarney M E, Stavropoulos D N. Determination of cantilever length-anterior-posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw-prosthesis joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 331-339.
41. White S N, Caputo A A, Anderkvist T. Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 493-499.
42. Rodriguez A M, Aquilino S A, Lund P S et al. Evaluation of strain at the terminal abutment site of a fixed mandibular implant prosthesis during cantilever loading. J Prosthodont 1993; 2: 93-102.
43. McCartney J W. Cantilever rests: an alternative to the unsupported distal cantilever of osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses for the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 817-819.
44. Jemt T, Carlsson L, Boss A, Jorneus L. In vivo load measurements on osseointegrated implants supporting fixed or removable prostheses: a comparative pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 413-417.
45. Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S et al. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 529-539.
46. Barewal R M, Oates T W, Meredith N, Cochran D L. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 641-651.
47. Goodkind R J, Heringlake C B. Mandibular flexure in opening and closing movement. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 30: 134-138.
48. Aalam A A, Reshad M, Chee W W, Nowzari H. Surgical template stabilization with transitional implants in the treatment of the edentulous mandible: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 462-465.