Warmth of familiarity and chill of error: Affective consequences of recognition decisions

Cognition and Emotion

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 385-415

  Chetverikov, Andrey ^a  

^a ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Affect; Familiarity; Mere exposure; Preferences; Recognition

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; CHILL; COGNITION; CONFUSION (UNCERTAINTY); DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEAT; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; META ANALYSIS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; THERMAL EXPOSURE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

AFFECT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84893809829     PISSN: 02699931     EISSN: 14640600     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.833085     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Allakhverdov, V. M., & Gershkovich, V. A. (2010). Does consciousness exist? In what sense? Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 44(4), 340-347. doi:10.1007/s12124-010-9133-8
2. Anand, P., Holbrook, M. B., & Stephens, D. (1988). The formation of affective judgments: The cognitive-affective model versus the independence hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(December), 386-392. doi:10.1086/209176
3. Anand, P., & Sternthal, B. (1991). Perceptual fluency and affect without recognition. Memory & Cognition, 19(3), 293-300. doi:10.3758/BF03211153
4. Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
5. Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science, 17(8), 645-648. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x
6. Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2008). The proactive brain: Using rudimentary information to make predictive judgments. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 330(4-5), 319-330. doi:10.1002/cb.254
7. Baudouin, J.-Y., Gilibert, D., Sansone, S., & Tiberghien, G. (2000). When the smile is a cue to familiarity. Memory, 8(5), 285-292. doi:10.1080/09658210050117717
8. Berlyne, D. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153(3731), 25-33. doi:10.1126/science.153.3731.25
9. Berlyne, D. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 8(5), 279-286. doi:10.3758/BF03212593
10. Bonanno, G. A., & Stillings, N. A. (1986). Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes. The American Journal of Psychology, 99(3), 403-415. doi:10.2307/1422493
11. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
12. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 545-552. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545
13. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluence/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12(2), 103-128. doi:10.1521/soco.1994.12.2.103
14. Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 52(3), 384-389. doi:10.1037/h0041006
15. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2), 123-152. doi:10.1037/h0043805
16. Card, N. A. (2011). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17. Chenier, T. T. (2010). On the cognitive origins of aesthetic pleasure (Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, San Diego). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (ProQuest document ID: 751558786). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/751558786
18. Chiu, P. H., & Deldin, P. J. (2007). Neural evidence for enhanced error detection in major depressive disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(4), 608-616. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.164.4.608
19. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181-204. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000477
20. Claypool, H. M., Hall, C. E., Mackie, D. M., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2008). Positive mood, attribution, and the illusion of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 721-728. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.05.001
21. Corneille, O., Monin, B., & Pleyers, G. (2005). Is positivity a cue or a response option? Warm glow vs. evaluative matching in the familiarity for attractive and not-so-attractive faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 431-437. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.004
22. Craver-Lemley, C., & Bornstein, R. F. (2006). Self-generated visual imagery alters the mere exposure effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1056-1060. doi:10.3758/BF03213925
23. Criss, A. H. (2009). The distribution of subjective memory strength: List strength and response bias. Cognitive psychology, 59(4), 297-319. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.07.003
24. Dienes, Z., Scott, R. B., & Seth, A. (2010). Subjective measures of implicit knowledge that go beyond confidence: Reply to Overgaard et al. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(2), 685-686. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.01.010
25. Dienes, Z., & Seth, A. (2010). Gambling on the unconscious: A comparison of wagering and confidence ratings as measures of awareness in an artificial grammar task. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(2), 674-681. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.009
26. Fenske, M. J., & Raymond, J. E. (2006). Affective influences of selective attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 312-316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00459.x
27. Fenske, M. J., Raymond, J. E., Kessler, K., Westoby, N., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Attentional inhibition has social-emotional consequences for unfamiliar faces. Psychological Science, 16(10), 753-758. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01609.x
28. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
29. Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2004). Positivity can cue familiarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(5), 585-593. doi:10.1177/0146167203262856
30. Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2010). Is it familiar or positive? Mutual facilitation of response latencies. Social Cognition, 28(2), 205-218. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.2.205
31. Gordon, P. C., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Implicit learning and generalization of the "mere exposure" effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 492-500. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.492
32. Gregory, R. L. (1970). The intelligent eye. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
33. Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. F. (2003). Anxiety and error-related brain activity. Biological Psychology, 64(1-2), 77-90. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00103-0
34. Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. F. (2004). Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect. Brain and cognition, 56(2), 189-197. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2003.11.001
35. Halberstadt, J. (2006). The generality and ultimate origins of the attractiveness of prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 166-183. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_5
36. Halberstadt, J., & Rhodes, G. (2000). The attractiveness of nonface averages: Implications for an evolutionary explanation of the attractiveness of average faces. Psychological Science, 11(4), 285-289. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00257
37. Harmon-Jones, E. (2000). Cognitive dissonance and experienced negative affect: Evidence that dissonance increases experienced negative affect even in the absence of aversive consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(12), 1490-1501. doi:10.1177/01461672002612004
38. Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2003). Whatever happened to cognitive dissonance theory? The General Psychologist, 38(2), 28-33.
39. Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 38(1), 7-16. doi:10.1024/0044-3514.38.1.7
40. Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (1999). An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 3-21). Washington, DC: APA.
41. Heyduk, R., & Bahrick, L. (1977). Complexity, response competition, and preference. Implications for affective consequences of repeated exposure. Motivation and Emotion, 1(3), 249-259. doi:10.1007/BF00998863
42. Hohwy, J. (2012). Attention and conscious perception in the hypothesis testing brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(96). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00096
43. Holmes, A. J., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2008). Spatiotemporal dynamics of error processing dysfunctions in major depressive disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65(2), 179-188. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.19
44. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. I.Roediger & F.Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391-422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54-69. doi:10.1037/a0028347
46. Keller, F., Gunasekharan, S., Mayo, N., & Corley, M. (2009). Timing accuracy of web experiments: A case study using the WebExp software package. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 1-12. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.1.12
47. Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207(4430), 557-558. doi:10.1126/science.7352271
48. Labroo, A., Dhar, R., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Of frog wines and frowning watches: Semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 819-831. doi:10.1086/523290
49. Lander, K., & Metcalfe, S. (2007). The influence of positive and negative facial expressions on face familiarity. Memory, 15(1), 63-69. doi:10.1080/09658210601108732
50. Lee, A. Y. (1994). The mere exposure effect: Is it a mere case of misattribution? Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 270-275.
51. Lee, A. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1255-1266. doi:10.1177/01461672012710002
52. Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151-165. doi:10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665
53. Lewis, I., Watson, B., & White, K. M. (2009). Internet versus paper-and-pencil survey methods in psychological experiments: Equivalence testing of participant responses to health-related messages. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(2), 107-116. doi:10.1080/00049530802105865
54. Luu, P., Collins, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2000). Mood, personality, and self-monitoring: Negative affect and emotionality in relation to frontal lobe mechanisms of error monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 129(1), 43-60.
55. Lyubomirsky, S., & Ross, L. (1999). Changes in attractiveness of elected, rejected, and precluded alternatives: A comparison of happy and unhappy individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 988-1007. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.988
56. Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & Van Zandt, B. J. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 646-648. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.646
57. Mather, M., Shafir, E., & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Misremembrance of options past: Source monitoring and choice. Psychological Science, 11(2), 132-138. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00228
58. Mather, M., Shafir, E., & Johnson, M. K. (2003). Remembering chosen and assigned options. Memory & Cognition, 31(3), 422-433. doi:10.3758/BF03194400
59. Matlin, M. W. (1971). Response competition, recognition, and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(3), 295-300. doi:10.1037/h0031352
60. Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11(6), 462-466. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00289
61. Monin, B. (2003). The warm glow heuristic: When liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1035-1048. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1035
62. Monin, B., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2005). Correlated averages vs. averaged correlations: Demonstrating the warm glow heuristic beyond aggregation. Social Cognition, 23(3), 257-278. doi:10.1521/soco.2005.23.3.257
63. Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723-739. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723
64. Newell, B., & Bright, J. (2001). The relationship between the structural mere exposure effect and the implicit learning process. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 54(4), 1087-1104.
65. Newell, B., & Shanks, D. (2007). Recognising what you like: Examining the relation between the mere-exposure effect and recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 103-118. doi:10.1080/09541440500487454
66. Nordhielm, C. L. (2002). The influence of level of processing on advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 371-382. doi:10.1086/344428
67. Obermiller, C. (1985). Varieties of mere exposure: The effects of processing style and repetition on affective response. The Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 17-30. doi:10.1086/209032
68. Overgaard, M., Timmermans, B., Sandberg, K., & Cleeremans, A. (2010). Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(2), 682-684. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.018
69. Persaud, N., McLeod, P., & Cowey, A. (2007). Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 10(2), 257-261. doi:10.1038/nn1840
70. Phaf, R. H., & Rotteveel, M. (2005). Affective modulation of recognition bias. Emotion, 5(3), 309-318. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309
71. Phillips, P., Moon, H., Rizvi, S., & Rauss, P. (2000). The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(10), 1090-1104. doi:10.1109/34.879790
72. Phillips, P., Wechsler, H., Huang, J., & Rauss, P. (1998). The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms. Image and Vision Computing, 16(5), 295-306. doi:10.1016/S0262-8856(97)00070-X
73. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with "the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(3), 416-426. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2650
74. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6-7), 15-51.
75. Raymond, J. E., Fenske, M. J., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2003). Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 14(6), 537-542. doi:10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1462.x
76. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
77. Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45-48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008
78. Reimers, S., & Stewart, N. (2007). Adobe flash as a medium for online experimentation: A test of reaction time measurement capabilities. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 365-370. doi:10.3758/BF03193004
79. Rotteveel, M., & Phaf, R. H. (2007). Mere exposure in reverse: Mood and motion modulate memory bias. Cognition and Emotion, 21(6), 1323-1346. doi:10.1080/02699930701438319
80. Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Chacón-Moscoso, S. (2003). Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 448-467. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.448
81. Sandberg, K., Timmermans, B., Overgaard, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2010). Measuring consciousness: Is one measure better than the other? Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.013
82. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 379-399. doi:10.1037/h0046234
83. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513-523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
84. Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., & Kauff, D. M. (1983). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: Effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(3), 544-555. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.3.544
85. Seamon, J. G., Williams, P. C., Crowley, M. J., Kim, I. J., Langer, S. A., Orne, P. J., & Wishengrad, D. L. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 711-721. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.711
86. Shamoun, S., & Svenson, O. (2002). Value conflict and post-decision consolidation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43(4), 325-333. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00301
87. Simon, D. (2004). A third view of the black box: Cognitive coherence in legal decision making. The University of Chicago Law Review, 71(2), 511-586.
88. Simon, D., Krawczyk, D. C., & Holyoak, K. J. (2004). Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15(5), 331-336. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00678.x
89. Stang, D. J. (1975). Effects of "mere exposure" on learning and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(1), 7-12. doi:10.1037/h0076165
90. Subramaniam, S., Biederman, I., & Madigan, S. (2000). Accurate identification but no priming and chance recognition memory for pictures in RSVP sequences. Visual Cognition, 7(4), 511-535. doi:10.1080/135062800394630
91. Svenson, O., & Benthorn, L. J. (1992). Consolidation processes in decision making: Post-decision changes in attractiveness of alternatives. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(2), 315-327. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(92)90036-7
92. The Psychological Image Collection at Stirling (PICS). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://pics.psych.stir.ac.uk/
93. Topolinski, S. (2012). The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 260-281. doi:10.1037/a0025658
94. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009a). Scanning the "fringe" of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(3), 608-618. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.06.002
95. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009b). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23(8), 1465-1503. doi:10.1080/02699930802420745
96. Unicode Inc. (2011). CJK Unified Ideographs (including Extension A-D). Retrieved from http://www.unicode.org/charts/index.html
97. Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1-48.
98. Vilberg, K. L., & Rugg, M. D. (2008). Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: A review of evidence from a dual-process perspective. Neuropsychologia, 46(7), 1787-1799. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.004
99. Vilberg, K. L., & Rugg, M. D. (2009). An investigation of the effects of relative probability of old and new test items on the neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful source memory. NeuroImage, 45(2), 562-571. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.020
100. Wang, M.-Y., & Chang, H.-C. (2004). The mere exposure effect and recognition memory. Cognition and Emotion, 18(8), 1055-1078. doi:10.1080/02699930341000374
101. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Price, J. (2001). Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 234-246. doi:10.3758/BF03194917
102. Willems, S., Dedonder, J., & Van der Linden, M. (2010). The mere exposure effect and recognition depend on the way you look!Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 185-192. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000023
103. Wilson, W. R. (1979). Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 811-821. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.811
104. Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989-1000. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989
105. Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., & Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17(9), 799-806. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x
106. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J.Musch & K. C.Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189-217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
107. Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 152-176. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152
108. Yonelinas, A. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 441-517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
109. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
110. Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 31-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111. Zillman, D. (1978). Attribution and misattribution of excitatory reactions. In J. H.Harvey, W. I.Ickes, & R. F.Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 335-368). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
112. Zizak, D. M., & Reber, A. S. (2004). Implicit preferences: The role(s) of familiarity in the structural mere exposure effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(2), 336-362. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2003.12.003