Correlated averages vs. averaged correlations: Demonstrating the warm glow heuristic beyond aggregation

Social Cognition

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 257-278

  Monin, Benoît ^a   Oppenheimer, Daniel M ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24144484118     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: 0278016X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2005.23.3.257     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluation from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431-441.
2. Beattie, J., & Baron, J. (1991). Investigating the effect of stimulus range on attribute weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 571-585.
3. Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1387-1397.
4. Corneille, O., Monin, B., & Pleyers, G. (in press). Is positivity a cue or a response option? Warm-glow versus evaluative-matching in the familiarity for attractive and not-so-attractive faces. In press, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
5. Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
6. Downs, A. C., & Lyons, P. M. (1991). Natural observations of the links between attractiveness and initial legal judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 541-547.
7. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but..: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychology Bulletin, 110, 107-128.
8. Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. Positivity Can Cue Familiarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 585-593.
9. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., & the ABC Research Group (1999). Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Gordon, K. H. (1924). Group judgments in the field of lifted weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 398-400.
11. Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. E. (1994). Beauty and the labor market. American Economic Review, 84, 1174-1195.
12. Hilton, D. (1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 65-81.
13. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 220, 306-340.
14. Johnston, W. A., Dark, V. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1985). Perceptual fluency and recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 3-11.
15. Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 57-70.
16. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Keeney, R. L., & Raifa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade offs. New York: Wiley.
18. Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462-473.
19. Monin, B. (2003). The warm glow heuristic: When liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1035-1048.
20. Nickerson, C. A. E. (1995). Does willingness to pay reflect the purchase of moral satisfaction? A reconsideration of Kahneman and Knetsch. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 126-133.
21. Oppenheimer, D. M. (2004). Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks. Psychological Science, 15, 100-105.
22. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aes thetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382.
23. Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48.
24. Rosenthal, R. (1987). Judgment studies: Design, analysis, and meta-analysis. NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Schwarz, N. (2004). Meta-cognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24, 332-348.
26. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
27. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
28. Vokey, J. R., & Read, J. D. (1992). Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces. Memory and Cognition, 20, 291-302.
29. Whittlesea, B. W., & Williams, L. (2001). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 3-13.
30. Winkielman, P., Zajonc, R. B., & Schwarz, N. (1997). Subliminal affective priming resists attributional interventions. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 433-465.
31. Zajonc, R. B. (1962). A note on group judgements and group size. Human Relations, 15, 177-180.
32. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27.
33. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
34. Zajonc, R.B. (1998). Emotions. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 591-632). New York: McGraw-Hill.