Recognising what you like: Examining the relation between the mere-exposure effect and recognition

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 103-118

  Newell, Ben R ^a   Shanks, David R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPOSURE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 33750514806     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440500487454     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Berry, C. J., Shanks, D. R., & Henson, R. A. (in press). On the status of unconscious memory: Merikle and Reingold (1991) revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
2. Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
3. Bornstein, R. F. (1992). Subliminal mere exposure effects. In T. S. Pittman & R. F. Bornstein (Eds.), Perception without awareness: Cognitive, clinical and social perspectives (pp. 191-210). New York: Guilford Press.
4. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 545-552.
5. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103-128.
6. Bornstein, R. F., Leone, D. R., & Galley, D. J. (1987). The generalizability of subliminal mere exposure effects: Influence of stimuli perceived without awareness on social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1070-1079.
7. Brooks, J. O., & Watkins, M. J. (1989). Recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 968-976.
8. Fox, S. E., & Burns, D. J. (1993). The mere exposure effect for stimuli presented below recognition threshold: A failure to replicate. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 391-396.
9. Howell, D. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
10. Jacoby, L. L., Allan, L. G., Collins, J. C., & Larwill, L. K. (1988). Memory influences subjective experience: Noise judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 240-247.
11. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135.
12. Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558.
13. Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & van Zandt, B. J. S. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 646-648.
14. Martinez, A. M., & Benavente, R. (1998). The AR Face database [CVC Tech. Rep. No. 24]. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
15. Merikle, P. M., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 224-233.
16. Murphy, S. T., Monahan, J. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1995). Additivity of nonconscious affect: Combined effects of priming and exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 589-602.
17. Newell, B. R., & Bright, J. E. H. (2001). The relationship between the structural mere exposure effect and the implicit learning process. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1087-1104.
18. Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., & Kauff, D. M. (1983). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: Effects of shadowing, masking and cerebral laterality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 544-555.
19. Ste. Marie, D. M., Latimer, A. E., & Brunet, S. (2001). Mere exposure effects for supraliminal stimuli: Examining the correction process. Paper presented at the 42nd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
20. Szpunar, K. K., Schellenberg, G., & Pliner, P. (2004). Liking and memory for musical stimuli as a function of exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 370-381.
21. Whittlesea, B. W. A., Jacoby, L. L., & Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 716-732.
22. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Price, J. R. (2001). Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/non-analytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory and Cognition, 29, 234-246.
23. Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224-228.