The attractiveness of nonface averages: Implications for an Evolutionary Explanation of the Attractiveness of Average Faces

Psychological Science

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 285-289

  Halberstadt, Jamin ^a   Rhodes, Gillian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BIRD; DECISION MAKING; DOG; ESTHETICS; EVOLUTION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

ADULT; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BEAUTY; BIRDS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DOGS; EVOLUTION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 0034231906     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00257     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bornstein, R.F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Review, 106, 265-289.
3. Endler, J.A., & Basolo, A.L. (1998). Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 415-420.
4. Enquist, M., & Arak, A. (1994). Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature, 372, 169-172.
5. Enquist, M., & Johnstone, R.A. (1997). Generalization and the evolution of symmetry preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 264, 1345-1348.
6. Fiske, S.T. (1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. In M.S. Clark & S.T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 55-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Franks, J.J., & Bransford, J.D. (1971). Abstraction of visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 65-74.
8. Gaver, W.W., & Mandler, G. (1987). Play it again, Sam: On liking music. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 259-282.
9. Gordon, P.C., & Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Implicit learning and generalization of the "mere exposure" effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 492-500.
10. Gould, S.J. (1978). Sociobiology: The art of storytelling. New Scientist, 16, 530-533.
11. Gould, S.J. (1991). Exaptation: A crucial tool for an evolutionary psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 43-65.
12. Gould, S.J., & Lewontin, R.C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 205, 581-598.
13. Johnstone, R.A. (1994). Female preference for symmetrical males as a byproduct of selection for mate recognition. Nature, 372, 17-175.
14. Kalick, S.M., Zebrowitz, L.A., Langlois, J.H., & Johnson, R.M. (1998). Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal data on an evolutionary question. Psychological Science, 9, 8-13.
15. Kunst-Wilson, W.R., & Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558.
16. Langlois, J.H., & Roggman. L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121.
17. Langlois, J.H., Roggman, L.A., & Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5, 214-220.
18. Light, L.L., Hollander, S., & Kayra-Stuart, F. (1981). Why attractive people are harder to remember. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 269-276.
19. Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body. New York: W.W. Norton.
20. Perrins, C.M. (1990). The illustrated encyclopedia of birds: The definitive guide to birds of the world. London: Headline.
21. Repp, B.H. (1997). The aesthetic quality of a quantitatively average music performance: Two preliminary experiments. Music Perception, 14, 419-444.
22. Rhodes, G., Halberstadt, J.H., & Brajkovich, G. (2000). Generalization of mere exposure effects in social stimuli. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23. Rhodes, G., Sumich, A., & Byatt, G. (1999). Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science, 10, 52-58.
24. Rhodes, G., & Tremewan, T. (1996). Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychological Science, 7, 105-110.
25. Rose, S., Kamin, L.J., & Lewontin, R.C. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology and human nature. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
26. Rubenstein, A.J., Kalakanis, L., & Langlois, J.H. (1999). Infant preferences for attractive faces; A cognitive explanation. Developmental Psychology, 15, 848-855.
27. Selby, I. de L.S. (1994). Wrist watches. Philadelphia: Courage Books.
28. Smith, J.D., & Melara, R.J. (1990). Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: 'Tis the gift to be simple. Cognition, 34, 279-298.
29. Solso, R.L., & McCarthy, J.E. (1981). Prototype formation: Central tendency model vs. attribute frequency model. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 10-11.
30. Solso, R.L., & Raynis, S.A. (1979). Prototype formation from imaged, kinesthetically, and visually presented geometric figures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 701-712.
31. Sylvester, P. (1993). The Reader's Digest illustrated book of dogs (2nd rev. ed.). Montreal, Canada: Reader's Digest.
32. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S.W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237-269.
33. Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27.