Perception of 3D spatial relations for 3D displays

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5291, Issue , 2004, Pages 9-16

  Rosen, Paul ^a   Pizlo, Zygmunt ^a   Hoffmann, Christoph ^a   Popescu, Voicu ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR DISPARITY; COMPLEX OBJECTS; ROTATING SCREEN; SPATIAL RELATIONS;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; GLASS; GRAPH THEORY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; RANDOM PROCESSES; SIGNAL DETECTION;

FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS;

EID: 8844238279     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.525530     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Perspecta 2003, Acutality Systems Inc., URL: http://www.actuality- systems.com/
2. DTI 2D/3D 2003, Dimension Technologies Inc. URL: http://www.dti3d.com/
3. IBM T221 2003, IBM Corporation, URL: http://www.ibm.com/
4. Chan M.W., Pizlo Z. & Chelberg D. (1999) Binocular shape reconstruction: psychological plausibility of the 8 point algorithm. Computer Vision & Vision Understanding, 74, 121-37.
5. Green D.M. & Swets J.W. (1966) Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. NY: Wiley.
6. Hochberg J. & Brooks V. (1962) Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: a study of one childe's performance. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 624-8.
7. Macmillan N.A. & Creelman C.D. (1991) Detection Theory: A User's Guide. Cambridge University Press.
8. Pizlo Z. (2001) Perception viewed as an inverse problem. Vision Research, 41, 3145-61.
9. Slater A. (1998) Visual organization and perceptual constancies in early infancy. In: Walsh V. & Kulikowski J. (Eds.), Perceptual Constancy, Cambridge University Press (pp. 6-30).
10. Wickens T.D. (2002) Elementary Signal Detection Theory. Oxford University Press.