In vitro membrane reconstitution of the T-cell receptor proximal signaling network

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 133-142

  Hui, Enfu ^a,b   Vale, Ronald D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIGENS, CD3; ANTIGENS, CD45; KINETICS; LIPID BILAYERS; LIPOSOMES; LYMPHOCYTE SPECIFIC PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE P56(LCK); MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOSPHORYLATION; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SRC-FAMILY KINASES;

EID: 84893747396     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2762     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Roskoski, R. Jr. Src kinase regulation by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 331, 1-14 (2005).
2. Nada, S., Okada, M., MacAuley, A., Cooper, J.A. & Nakagawa, H. Cloning of a complementary DNA for a protein-tyrosine kinase that specifcally phosphorylates a negative regulatory site of p60c-src. Nature 351, 69-72 (1991).
3. Imamoto, A. & Soriano, P. Disruption of the csk gene, encoding a negative regulator of Src family tyrosine kinases, leads to neural tube defects and embryonic lethality in mice. Cell 73, 1117-1124 (1993).
4. Sicheri, F., Moaref, I. & Kuriyan, J. Crystal structure of the Src family tyrosine kinase Hck. Nature 385, 602-609 (1997).
5. Xu, W., Doshi, A., Lei, M., Eck, M.J. & Harrison, S.C. Crystal structures of c-Src reveal features of its autoinhibitory mechanism. Mol. Cell 3, 629-638 (1999).
6. Hermiston, M.L., Xu, Z. & Weiss, A. CD45: a critical regulator of signaling thresholds in immune cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21, 107-137 (2003).
7. Ostergaard, H.L. et al. Expression of CD45 alters phosphorylation of the lck-encoded tyrosine protein kinase in murine lymphoma T-cell lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 8959-8963 (1989).
8. D'Oro, U., Sakaguchi, K., Appella, E. & Ashwell, J.D. Mutational analysis of Lck in CD45-negative T cells: dominant role of tyrosine 394 phosphorylation in kinase activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4996-5003 (1996).
9. Baker, M. et al. Development of T-leukaemias in CD45 tyrosine phosphatase-defcient mutant lck mice. EMBO J. 19, 4644-4654 (2000).
10. Furukawa, T., Itoh, M., Krueger, N.X., Streuli, M. & Saito, H. Specifc interaction of the CD45 protein-tyrosine phosphatase with tyrosine-phosphorylated CD3 zeta chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10928-10932 (1994).
11. Amrein, K.E. & Sefton, B.M. Mutation of a site of tyrosine phosphorylation in the lymphocyte-specifc tyrosine protein kinase, p56lck, reveals its oncogenic potential in fbroblasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 4247-4251 (1988).
12. Mukhopadhyay, H., Cordoba, S.P., Maini, P.K., van der Merwe, P.A. & Dushek, O. Systems model of T cell receptor proximal signaling reveals emergent ultrasensitivity. PLOS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003004 (2013).
13. Chakraborty, A.K. & Das, J. Pairing computation with experimentation: a powerful coupling for understanding T cell signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 59-71 (2010).
14. Palacios, E.H. & Weiss, A. Function of the Src-family kinases, Lck and Fyn, in T-cell development and activation. Oncogene 23, 7990-8000 (2004).
15. Nye, J.A. & Groves, J.T. Kinetic control of histidine-tagged protein surface density on supported lipid bilayers. Langmuir 24, 4145-4149 (2008).
16. Adam, G. & Delbrück, M. in Structural Chemistry and Molecular Biology 198-215 (Freeman, 1968).
17. Wang, D., Gou, S.Y. & Axelrod, D. Reaction rate enhancement by surface diffusion of adsorbates. Biophys. Chem. 43, 117-137 (1992).
18. Gureasko, J. et al. Membrane-dependent signal integration by the Ras activator Son of sevenless. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 452-461 (2008).
19. Xu, C. et al. Regulation of T cell receptor activation by dynamic membrane binding of the CD3epsilon cytoplasmic tyrosine-based motif. Cell 135, 702-713 (2008).
20. 2+ regulates T-cell receptor activation by modulating the charge property of lipids. Nature 493, 111-115 (2013).
21. Brugger, B. et al. The HIV lipidome: a raft with an unusual composition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 2641-2646 (2006).
22. Yamaguchi, H. & Hendrickson, W.A. Structural basis for activation of human lymphocyte kinase Lck upon tyrosine phosphorylation. Nature 384, 484-489 (1996).
23. Veillette, A., Latour, S. & Davidson, D. Negative regulation of immunoreceptor signaling. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20, 669-707 (2002).
24. Osusky, M., Taylor, S.J. & Shalloway, D. Autophosphorylation of purifed c-Src at its primary negative regulation site. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25729-25732 (1995).
25. Cooper, J.A. & MacAuley, A. Potential positive and negative autoregulation of p60c-src by intermolecular autophosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 4232-4236 (1988).
26. Ramer, S.E., Winkler, D.G., Carrera, A., Roberts, T.M. & Walsh, C.T. Purifcation and initial characterization of the lymphoid-cell protein-tyrosine kinase p56lck from a baculovirus expression system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 6254-6258 (1991).
27. Housden, H.R. et al. Investigation of the kinetics and order of tyrosine phosphorylation in the T-cell receptor zeta chain by the protein tyrosine kinase Lck. Eur. J. Biochem. 270, 2369-2376 (2003).
28. Nika, K. et al. Constitutively active Lck kinase in T cells drives antigen receptor signal transduction. Immunity 32, 766-777 (2010).
29. Scott, M.P. & Miller, W.T. A peptide model system for processive phosphorylation by Src family kinases. Biochemistry 39, 14531-14537 (2000).
30. Pellicena, P. & Miller, W.T. Processive phosphorylation of p130Cas by Src depends on SH3-polyproline interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 28190-28196 (2001).
31. Weissenhorn, W., Eck, M.J., Harrison, S.C. & Wiley, D.C. Phosphorylated T cell receptor zeta-chain and ZAP70 tandem SH2 domains form a 1:3 complex in vitro. Eur. J. Biochem. 238, 440-445 (1996).
32. Patwardhan, P., Shen, Y., Goldberg, G.S. & Miller, W.T. Individual Cas phosphorylation sites are dispensable for processive phosphorylation by Src and anchorage-independent cell growth. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 20689-20697 (2006).
33. Takahashi, M., Shibata, T., Yanagida, T. & Sako, Y. A protein switch with tunable steepness reconstructed in Escherichia coli cells with eukaryotic signaling proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 421, 731-735 (2012).
34. Brdicka, T. et al. Phosphoprotein associated with glycosphingolipid- enriched microdomains (PAG), a novel ubiquitously expressed transmembrane adaptor protein, binds the protein tyrosine kinase csk and is involved in regulation of T cell activation. J. Exp. Med. 191, 1591-1604 (2000).
35. Kawabuchi, M. et al. Transmembrane phosphoprotein Cbp regulates the activities of Src-family tyrosine kinases. Nature 404, 999-1003 (2000).
36. Schoenborn, J.R., Tan, Y.X., Zhang, C., Shokat, K.M. & Weiss, A. Feedback circuits monitor and adjust basal Lck-dependent events in T cell receptor signaling. Sci. Signal. 4, ra59 (2011).
37. Bunnell, S.C. et al. T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies. J. Cell Biol. 158, 1263-1275 (2002).
38. Douglass, A.D. & Vale, R.D. Single-molecule microscopy reveals plasma membrane microdomains created by protein-protein networks that exclude or trap signaling molecules in T cells. Cell 121, 937-950 (2005).
39. Varma, R., Campi, G., Yokosuka, T., Saito, T. & Dustin, M.L. T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. Immunity 25, 117-127 (2006).
40. Banaszynski, L.A., Liu, C.W. & Wandless, T.J. Characterization of the FKBP•rapamycin•FRB ternary complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 4715-4721 (2005).
41. Li, P. et al. Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins. Nature 483, 336-340 (2012).
42. Schamel, W.W. et al. Coexistence of multivalent and monovalent TCRs explains high sensitivity and wide range of response. J. Exp. Med. 202, 493-503 (2005).
43. Lillemeier, B.F. et al. TCR and Lat are expressed on separate protein islands on T cell membranes and concatenate during activation. Nat. Immunol. 11, 90-96 (2010).
44. Haynes, N.M. et al. Redirecting mouse CTL against colon carcinoma: superior signaling effcacy of single-chain variable domain chimeras containing TCR-Ç vs. FceRI-y. J. Immunol. 166, 182-187 (2001).
45. Courtneidge, S.A. Activation of the pp60c-src kinase by middle T antigen binding or by dephosphorylation. EMBO J. 4, 1471-1477 (1985).
46. Cooper, J.A. & King, CS. Dephosphorylation or antibody binding to the carboxy terminus stimulates pp60c-src. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 4467-4477 (1986).
47. Piwnica-Worms, H., Saunders, K.B., Roberts, T.M., Smith, A.E. & Cheng, S.H. Tyrosine phosphorylation regulates the biochemical and biological properties of pp60c-src. Cell 49, 75-82 (1987).
48. Kmiecik, T.E. & Shalloway, D. Activation and suppression of pp60c-src transforming ability by mutation of its primary sites of tyrosine phosphorylation. Cell 49, 65-73 (1987).
49. Cartwright, CA., Eckhart, W., Simon, S. & Kaplan, P.L. Cell transformation by pp60c-src mutated in the carboxy-terminal regulatory domain. Cell 49, 83-91 (1987).
50. Kmiecik, T.E., Johnson, P.J. & Shalloway, D. Regulation by the autophosphorylation site in overexpressed pp60c-src. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 4541-4546 (1988).
51. Sun, G., Sharma, A.K. & Budde, R.J. Autophosphorylation of Src and Yes blocks their inactivation by Csk phosphorylation. Oncogene 17, 1587-1595 (1998).
52. Alonso, A. et al. Lck dephosphorylation at Tyr-394 and inhibition of T cell antigen receptor signaling by Yersinia phosphatase YopH. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 4922-4928 (2004).
53. Burchat, A.F. et al. Pyrrolo[2, 3-d]pyrimidines containing an extended 5-substituent as potent and selective inhibitors of lck II. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10, 2171-2174 (2000).
54. Tan, Y.X., Zikherman, J. & Weiss, A. Novel tools to dissect the dynamic regulation of TCR signaling by the kinase Csk and the phosphatase CD45. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. (2013).
55. McNeill, L. et al. CD45 isoforms in T cell signalling and development. Immunol. Lett. 92, 125-134 (2004).
56. Ferrell, J.E. Jr. & Machleder, E.M. The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. Science 280, 895-898 (1998).
57. Dushek, O., van der Merwe, P.A. & Shahrezaei, V. Ultrasensitivity in multisite phosphorylation of membrane-anchored proteins. Biophys. J. 100, 1189-1197 (2011).
58. Davis, S.J. & van der Merwe, P.A. The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond. Nat. Immunol. 7, 803-809 (2006).
59. James, J.R. & Vale, R.D. Biophysical mechanism of T-cell receptor triggering in a reconstituted system. Nature 487, 64-69 (2012).
60. Li, H., Korennykh, A.V., Behrman, S.L. & Walter, P. Mammalian endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor IRE1 signals by dynamic clustering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16113-16118 (2010).
61. 2+-triggered fusion in vitro: critical residues revealed by scanning alanine mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 31763-31775 (2008).
62. Mege, J.L. et al. Quantifcation of cell surface roughness; a method for studying cell mechanical and adhesive properties. J. Theor. Biol. 119, 147-160 (1986).
63. Olszowy, M.W., Leuchtmann, P.L., Veillette, A. & Shaw, A.S. Comparison of p56lck and p59fyn protein expression in thymocyte subsets, peripheral T cells, NK cells, and lymphoid cell lines. J. Immunol. 155, 4236-4240 (1995).
64. Meuer, S.C. et al. Evidence for the T3-associated 90K heterodimer as the T-cell antigen receptor. Nature 303, 808-810 (1983).
65. Schodin, B.A., Tsomides, T.J. & Kranz, D.M. Correlation between the number of T cell receptors required for T cell activation and TCR-ligand affnity. Immunity 5, 137-146 (1996).
66. Wiener, M.C. & White, S.H. Structure of a fuid dioleoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer determined by joint refnement of X-ray and neutron diffraction data. III. Complete structure. Biophys. J. 61, 434-447 (1992).
67. Cullis, P.R., Fenske, D.B. & Hope, M.J. in Biochemistry of Lipids, Lipoproteins and Membranes 3rd edn. (eds. Vance, D.E. & Vance, J.E.) 1-33 (Elsevier, 1996).