Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that apo-HisJ can sample a closed conformation

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 386-398

  Chu, B C H ^a   Chan, D I ^a   Dewolf, T ^a   Periole, X ^b   Vogel, H J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

HisJ; Molecular dynamics; Periplasmic binding protein; Protein dynamics; Protein structure

Indexed keywords

ABC TRANSPORTER; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; HISTIDINE; PERIPLASMIC BINDING PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ATOM; CELL MEMBRANE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROGEN BOND; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

DIONAEA; ESCHERICHIA COLI;

HISJ; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PERIPLASMIC BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN DYNAMICS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

APOPROTEINS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PERIPLASMIC BINDING PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

EID: 84893734804     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24396     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Neu HC, Heppel LA. The release of enzymes from Escherichia coli by osmotic shock and during the formation of spheroplasts. J Biol Chem 1965;240:3685-3692.
2. Nossal NG, Heppel LA. The release of enzymes by osmotic shock from Escherichia coli in exponential phase. J Biol Chem 1966;241:3055-3062.
3. Piperno JR, Oxender DL. Amino-acid-binding protein released from Escherichia coli by osmotic shock. J Biol Chem 1966;241:5732-5734.
4. Claverys JP. A new family of high-affinity ABC manganese and zinc permeases. Res Microbiol 2001;152:231-243.
5. Fukami-Kobayashi K, Tateno Y, Nishikawa K. Domain dislocation: a change of core structure in periplasmic binding proteins in their evolutionary history. J Mol Biol 1999;286:279-290.
6. Krewulak KD, Peacock RS, Vogel HJ. Periplasmic binding proteins involved in bacterial iron uptake. In: Crosa JH, Mey AR, Payne SM, editors. Iron transport in bacteria. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press; 2004. p 499.
7. Lee YH, Deka RK, Norgard MV, Radolf JD, Hasemann CA. Treponema pallidum TroA is a periplasmic zinc-binding protein with a helical backbone. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:628-633.
8. Quiocho FA, Ledvina PS. Atomic structure and specificity of bacterial periplasmic receptors for active transport and chemotaxis: variation of common themes. Mol Microbiol 1996;20:17-25.
9. Tam R, Saier MH Jr. Structural, functional, and evolutionary relationships among extracellular solute-binding receptors of bacteria. Microbiol Rev 1993;57:320-346.
10. Krewulak KD, Vogel HJ. Structural biology of bacterial iron uptake. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008;1778:1781-1804.
11. Chu BC, Vogel HJ. A structural and functional analysis of type III periplasmic and substrate binding proteins: their role in bacterial siderophore and heme transport. Biol Chem 2011;392:39-52.
12. Berntsson RP, Smits SH, Schmitt L, Slotboom DJ, Poolman B. A structural classification of substrate-binding proteins. FEBS Lett 2010;584:2606-2017.
13. Felder CB, Graul RC, Lee AY, Merkle HP, Sadee W. The Venus flytrap of periplasmic binding proteins: an ancient protein module present in multiple drug receptors. AAPS Pharm Sci 1999;1:E2.
14. Ames GF. Bacterial periplasmic transport systems: structure, mechanism, and evolution. Annu Rev Biochem 1986;55:397-425.
15. Ames GF, Lever JE. The histidine-binding protein J is a component of histidine transport. Identification of its structural gene, hisJ. J Biol Chem 1972;247:4309-4316.
16. Lever JE. Quantitative assay of the binding of small molecules to protein: comparison of dialysis and membrane filter assays. Anal Biochem 1972;50:73-83.
17. Oh BH, Kang CH, De Bondt H, Kim SH, Nikaido K, Joshi AK, Ames GF. The bacterial periplasmic histidine-binding protein. structure/function analysis of the ligand-binding site and comparison with related proteins. J Biol Chem 1994;269:4135-4143.
18. Wolf A, Lee KC, Kirsch JF, Ames GF. Ligand-dependent conformational plasticity of the periplasmic histidine-binding protein HisJ. Involvement in transport specificity. J Biol Chem 1996;271:21243-21250.
19. Clarke TE, Braun V, Winkelmann G, Tari LW, Vogel HJ. X-ray crystallographic structures of the Escherichia coli periplasmic protein FhuD bound to hydroxamate-type siderophores and the antibiotic albomycin. J Biol Chem 2002;277:13966-13972.
20. Roosenberg JM, Lin YM, Lu Y, Miller MJ. Studies and syntheses of siderophores, microbial iron chelators, and analogs as potential drug delivery agents. Curr Med Chem 2000;7:159-197.
21. Urwyler S. Allosteric modulation of family C G-protein-coupled receptors: from molecular insights to therapeutic perspectives. Pharmacol Rev 2011;63:59-126.
22. Looger LL, Dwyer MA, Smith JJ, Hellinga HW. Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions. Nature 2003;423:185-190.
23. Wolf A, Shaw EW, Nikaido K, Ames GF. The histidine-binding protein undergoes conformational changes in the absence of ligand as analyzed with conformation-specific monoclonal antibodies. J Biol Chem 1994;269:23051-23058.
24. Yao N, Trakhanov S, Quiocho FA. Refined 1.89-A structure of the histidine-binding protein complexed with histidine and its relationship with many other active transport/chemosensory proteins. Biochemistry 1994;33:4769-4779.
25. Eswar N, John B, Mirkovic N, Fiser A, Ilyin VA, Pieper U, Stuart AC, Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Yerkovich B. Tools for comparative protein structure modeling and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3375-3380.
26. Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997;18:2714-2723.
27. van der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJ. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 2005;26:1701-1718.
28. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS All-Atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 1996;118:11225-11236.
29. Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemcial calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B 2001;105:6474-6487.
30. Berendsen HJ, Postma J, Van Gusteren W, Hermans J. Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. In: Pullman B, editor. Intermolecular forces. The Netherlands: Reidel, Dordrecht; 1981. pp 331-342.
31. Feenstra KA, Hess B, Berendsen HJ. Improving efficiency of large time-scale molecular dynamics simulations of hydrogen-rich systems. J Comput Chem 1999;20:786-798.
32. Chan DI, Tieleman DP, Vogel HJ. Molecular dynamics simulations of beta-ketoacyl-, beta-hydroxyacyl-, and trans-2-enoyl-acyl carrier proteins of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 2010;49:2860-2868.
33. van der Spoel D, Lindahl B. Brute-force molecular dynamics simulations of Villin headpiece: comparison with NMR parameters. J Phys Chem B 2003;107:11178-11187.
34. Berendsen HJ, Postma J, Van Gusteren W, DiNola A, Haak J. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 1984;81:3684-3690.
35. Darden T, York D, Pedersen LG. Particle mesh Ewald-an NLog(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 1993;98:10089-10092.
36. Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys 1995;103:8577-8593.
37. Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJ, Fraaije JGEM. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 1997;18:1463-1472.
38. Miyamoto S, Kollman PA. SETTLE. J Comput Chem 1992;13:952-962.
39. Amadei A, Linssen AB, Berendsen HJ. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 1993;17:412-425.
40. van der Spoel D, de Groot BL, Hayward S, Berendsen HJ, Vogel HJ. Bending of the calmodulin central helix: a theoretical study. Protein Sci 1996;5:2044-2053.
41. Amadei A, Ceruso MA, Di Nola A. On the convergence of the conformational coordinates basis set obtained by the essential dynamics analysis of proteins' molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 1999;36:419-424.
42. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 1996;14:33-38.
43. Schrodinger, LLC. The PyMOL molecular graphics system, version 1.3r1. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, 2010.
44. Silva DA, Dominguez-Ramirez L, Rojo-Dominguez A, Sosa-Peinado A. Conformational dynamics of L-lysine, L-arginine, L-ornithine binding protein reveals ligand-dependent plasticity. Proteins 2011;79:2097-2108.
45. Ortega G, Castano D, Diercks T, Millet O. Carbohydrate affinity for the glucose-galactose binding protein is regulated by allosteric domain motions. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:19869-19876.
46. Pistolesi S, Tjandra N, Bermejo GA. Solution NMR studies of periplasmic binding proteins and their interaction partners. BioMol Concepts 2011;2:53-64.
47. Bermejo GA, Strub MP, Ho C, Tjandra N. Ligand-free open-closed transitions of periplasmic binding proteins: the case of glutamine-binding protein. Biochemistry 2010;49:1893-1902.
48. Hayward S, Berendsen HJ. Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: new results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme. Proteins 1998;30:144-154.
49. Wolf A, Shaw EW, Oh BH, De Bondt H, Joshi AK, Ames GF. Structure/function analysis of the periplasmic histidine-binding protein. Mutations decreasing ligand binding alter the properties of the conformational change and of the closed form. J Biol Chem 1995;270:16097-16106.
50. Stockner T, Vogel HJ, Tieleman DP. A salt-bridge motif involved in ligand binding and large-scale domain motions of the maltose-binding protein. Biophys J 2005;89:3362-3371.
51. Tang C, Schwieters CD, Clore GM. Open-to-closed transition in apo maltose-binding protein observed by paramagnetic NMR. Nature 2007;449:1078-1082.
52. Bruns CM, Nowalk AJ, Arvai AS, McTigue MA, Vaughan KG, Mietzner TA, McRee DE. Structure of Haemophilus influenzae Fe(+3)-binding protein reveals convergent evolution within a superfamily. Nat Struct Biol 1997;4:919-924.
53. Ledvina PS, Yao N, Choudhary A, Quiocho FA. Negative electrostatic surface potential of protein sites specific for anionic ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:6786-6791.
54. Luecke H, Quiocho FA. High specificity of a phosphate transport protein determined by hydrogen bonds. Nature 1990;347:402-406.
55. Bjorkman AJ, Mowbray SL. Multiple open forms of ribose-binding protein trace the path of its conformational change. J Mol Biol 1998;279:651-664.
56. Oh BH, Pandit J, Kang CH, Nikaido K, Gokcen S, Ames GF, Kim SH. Three-dimensional structures of the periplasmic lysine/arginine/ornithine-binding protein with and without a ligand. J Biol Chem 1993;268:11348-11355.
57. Pang A, Arinaminpathy Y, Sansom MSP, Biggin PC. Interdomain dynamics and ligand binding: molecular dynamics simulations of glutamine binding protein. FEBS Lett 2003;550:168-174.
58. Hall BA, Kaye SL, Pang A, Perera R, Biggin PC. Characterization of protein conformational states by normal-mode frequencies. J Am Chem Soc 2007;129:11394-11401.
59. Silva DA, Bowman GR, Sosa-Peinado A, Huang X. A role for both conformational selection and induced fit in ligand binding by the LAO protein. PLoS Comput Biol 2011;7:e1002054.
60. Yang AY, Mancera RL. Molecular dynamics simulations of ligand-induced backbone conformational changes in the binding site of the periplasmic lysine-, arginine-, ornithine-binding protein. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2008;22:799-814.
61. Pang A, Arinaminpathy Y, Sansom MS, Biggin PC. Comparative molecular dynamics-similar folds and similar motions? Proteins 2005;61:809-822.
62. Kreimer DI, Malak H, Lakowicz JR, Trakhanov S, Villar E, Shnyrov VL. Thermodynamics and dynamics of histidine-binding protein, the water-soluble receptor of histidine permease. Implications for the transport of high and low affinity ligands. Eur J Biochem 2000;267:4242-4252.
63. Olah GA, Trakhanov S, Trewhella J, Quiocho FA. Leucine/isoleucine/valine-binding protein contracts upon binding of ligand. J Biol Chem 1993;268:16241-16247.
64. Flocco MM, Mowbray SL. The 1.9 A x-ray structure of a closed unliganded form of the periplasmic glucose/galactose receptor from Salmonella typhimurium. J Biol Chem 1994;269:8931-8936.
65. Oswald C, Smits SH, Hoing M, Bremer E, Schmitt L. Structural analysis of the choline-binding protein ChoX in a semi-closed and ligand-free conformation. Biol Chem 2009;390:1163-1170.
66. Oswald C, Smits SH, Hoing M, Sohn-Bosser L, Dupont L, Le Rudulier D, Schmitt L, Bremer E. Crystal structures of the choline/acetylcholine substrate-binding protein ChoX from Sinorhizobium meliloti in the liganded and unliganded-closed states. J Biol Chem 2008;283:32848-32859.
67. Prossnitz E, Gee A, Ames GF. Reconstitution of the histidine periplasmic transport system in membrane vesicles. Energy coupling and interaction between the binding protein and the membrane complex. J Biol Chem 1989;264:5006-5014.
68. Ames GF, Liu CE, Joshi AK, Nikaido K. Liganded and unliganded receptors interact with equal affinity with the membrane complex of periplasmic permeases, a subfamily of traffic ATPases. J Biol Chem 1996;271:14264-14270.
69. Liu CE, Liu PQ, Wolf A, Lin E, Ames GF. Both lobes of the soluble receptor of the periplasmic histidine permease, an ABC transporter (traffic ATPase), interact with the membrane-bound complex. Effect of different ligands and consequences for the mechanism of action. J Biol Chem 1999;274:739-747.