Comparative molecular dynamics - Similar folds and similar motions?

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 809-822

  Pang, Andrew ^a   Arinaminpathy, Yalini ^a   Sansom, Mark S P ^a   Biggin, Philip C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Apo; Conformational space; Fold; Ligand; Simulations

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CYTOPLASM; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN STABILITY; SIMULATION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 28644451763     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20672     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
2. McCammon JA, Wolynes PG, Karplus M. Picosecond dynamics of tyrosine sidechains. Biochemistry 1979;18:927-942.
3. Gibson QH. Kinetics of oxygen binding to hemoglobin A. Biochemistry 1999;38:5191-5199.
4. Gerstein M, Lesk AM, Chothia C. Structural mechanism for domain movements in proteins. Biochemistry 1994;33:6739-6749.
5. Alexandrov V, Lehnert U, Echols N, Milburn D, Engelman D, Gerstein M. Normal modes for predicting protein motions: A comprehensive database assessment and associated Web tool. Protein Sci 2005;14:633-643.
6. Ma J. Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular complexes. Structure 2005;13:373-380.
7. McCammon JA, Harvey SC. Dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
8. Karplus M, Petsko GA. Molecular dynamics simulations in biology. Nature 1990;347:631-639.
9. van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJC. Computer simulation of molecular dynamics: methodology, applications and perspectives in chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 1990;29:992-1023.
10. Caves LSD, Evanseck JD, Karplus M. Locally accessible conformations of proteins: multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin. Prot Sci 1998;7:649-666.
11. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
12. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997;5:1093-1108.
13. Oh B-H, Pandit J, Kang C-H, Nikaido K, Gokcen S, Ames GF-L, Kim S-H. Three-dimensional structure of the periplasmic lysine/arginine/ornithine-binding protein with and without a ligand. J Biol Chem 1993;268:11348-11355.
14. Hsaio C-D, Sun Y-J, Rose J, Wang B-C. The crystal structure of glutamine-binding protein from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 1996;262:225-242.
15. Sun Y-J, Rose J, Wang B-C, HSiao C-D. The structure of glutamine binding protein complexed with glutamine at 1.94 Å resolution: comparisons with other amino acid binding proteins. J Mol Biol 1998;278:219-229.
16. Chen G-Q, Cui C, Mayer ML, Gouaux E. Functional characterization of a potassium-selective prokaryotic glutamate receptor. Nature 1999;402:817-821.
17. Mayer ML, Olson R, Gouaux E. Mechanisms for ligand binding to GluR0 ion channels: crystal structures of the glutamate and serine complexes and a closed apo state. J Mol Biol 2001;311:815-836.
18. Armstrong N, Sun Y, Chen G-Q, Gouaux E. Structure of a glutamate-receptor ligand-binding core in complex with kainate. Nature 1998;395:913-917.
19. Armstrong N, Gouaux E. Mechanisms for activation and antagonism of an AMPA-sensitive glutamate receptor: crystal structures of the GluR2 ligand binding core. Neuron 2000;28:165-181.
20. Mano I, Lamed Y, Teichberg VI. A Venus flytrap mechanism for activation and desensitzation of a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptors. J Biol Chem 1996;271:15299-15302.
21. Hayward S. Structural principles governing domain motions in proteins. Proteins 1999;36:425-435.
22. Tirion MM. Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 1996;77:1905-1908.
23. Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Erman B. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold Des 1997;2:173-181.
24. Jernigan RL, Doruker P, Bahar I, Wang Y, Kundu S. Protein motions with an efficient coarse-grained approach. Abstracts of Papers, 227th ACS National Meeting, Anaheim, CA, March 28-April 1, 2004 (COMP-012).
25. Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D. GROMACS 3.0: A package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 2001;7:306-317.
26. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 1984;81:3684-3690.
27. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald-an N.log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 1993;98:10089-10092.
28. Hess B, Bekker J, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije JGEM. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 1997;18:1463-1472.
29. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, Hermans J. Intermolecular forces. Dordrecht: Reidel; 1981.
30. Hermans J, Berendsen HJC, van Gunsteren WF, Postma JPM. A consistent empirical potential for water-protein interactions. Biopolymers 1984;23:1513-1518.
31. Holm L, Sander C. Mapping the protein universe. Science 1996;273:595-602.
32. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
33. Garcia AE. Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins. Phys Rev Lett 1992;68:2696-2699.
34. Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 1993;17:412-425.
35. Hess B. Convergence of sampling in protein simulations. Phys Rev E 2002;65:0319101-03191010.
36. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comp Graph Stats 1996;5:299-314.
37. Holm L, Sander C. The FSSP database of structurally aligned protein fold families. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;17:3600-3609.
38. Pang A, Arinaminpathy Y, Sansom MSP, Biggin PC. Interdomain dynamics and ligand binding: molecular dynamics simulations of glutamine binding protein. FEBS Lett 2003;550:168-174.
39. Faraldo-Gomez JD, Forrest LR, Baaden M, Bond PJ, Domene C, Patargias G, Cuthbertson J, Sansom MSP. Conformational sampling and dynamics of membrane proteins from 10-nanosecond computer simulations. Proteins 2004;57:783-791.
40. Efron B, Gong G. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jacknife and cross-validation. Am Statistician 1983;37:36-48.
41. Roccatano D, Mark AE, Hayward S. Investigation of the mechanism of domain closure in citrate synthase by molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Biol 2001;310:1039-1053.
42. Elber R, Ghosh A, Cardenas A. Long time dynamics of complex systems. Acc Chem Res 2002;35:396-403.
43. Dauber-Osguthorpe P, Osguthorpe DJ. Partitioning the motion in molecular dynamics simulations in characteristic modes of action. J Comput Chem 1993;14:1259-1271.
44. Brooks BR, Janezic D, Karplus M. Harmonic analysis of large systems: I. Methodology. J Comput Chem 1995;1995:1522-1542.
45. ben-Avraham D, Tirion MM. Normal modes analyses of macromolecules. Physica A 1998;249:415-423.
46. Hinsen K. Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations. J Comput Chem 1998;33:417-429.
47. Suhre K, Sanejouand YH. On the potential of normal-mode analysis for solving difficult molecular-replacement problems. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2004;60:796-799.
48. Tama F, Miyashita O, Brooks CL. Flexible multi-scale fitting of atomic structures into low-resolution electron density maps with elastic network normal mode analysis. J Mol Biol 2004;337:985-999.
49. Wako H, Endo S. ProMode: a database of normal mode analysis of proteins. Genome Inform Series 2002;13:519-520.
50. Krebs WG, Alexandrov V, Wilson CA, Echols N, Yu H, Gerstein M. Normal mode analysis of macromolecular motions in a database framework: developing mode concentration as a useful classifying statistic. Proteins 2002;48:682-695.
51. Suhre K, Sanejouand Y-H. EINemo: a normal mode web server for protein movement analysis and the generation of templates for molecular replacement. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(Web Server issue):W610-W614.
52. Haliloglu T, Bahar I, Erman B. Gaussian dynamics of folded proteins. Phys Rev Lett 1997;79:3090-3093.
53. Keskin O, Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behaviour. Biophys J 2000;78:2093-2106.
54. Kim MK, Chirikjian GS, Jernigan RL. Elastic models of conformational transitions in macromolecules. J Mol Graph Model 2002;21:151-160.
55. Doruker P, Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Dynamics of large proteins through hierarchical levels of coarse-grained structures. J Comput Chem 2002;23:119-127.
56. Valadie H, Lacapcre JJ, Sanejouand YH, Etchebest C. Dynamical properties of the MscL of Escherichia coli: a normal mode analysis. J Mol Biol 2003;332:657-674.
57. Kurkcuoglu O, Jernigan RL, Doruker P. Mixed levels of coarse-graining of large proteins using elastic network model succeeds in extracting the slowest motions. Polymer 2004;45:649-657.
58. Auffinger P, Louise-May S, Westhof E. Multiple molecular-dynamics simulations of the antocodon loop of tRNA(ASP) in aqeuous-solution with counterions. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:6720-6726.
59. Straub JE, Rashkin AB, Thirumalai D. Dynamics in rugged energy landscapes with applications to the S-peptide and ribonuclease A. J Am Chem Soc 1994;116:2049-2063.
60. 2+-saturated calmodulin D129N mutant studied by multiple molecular dynamics simulations. Protein Sci 2003;12:2215-2229.
61. Schlitter J, Engels M, Krueger P. Targeted molecular dynamics: a new approach for searching pathways of conformational transitions. J Mol Graph 1994;12:84-89.
62. Grubmuller H. Predicting slow structural transitions in macromolecular systems: conformational flooding. Phys Rev E 1995;52:2893-2906.
63. Schlick T. Time-trimming tricks for dynamic simulations: splitting force updates to reduce computational work. Structure 2001;9:R45-R53.
64. McQuarrie DA. Statistical thermodynamics. New York: HarperCollins; 1976. 641 p.
65. Smith PE, Pettit BM, Karplus M. Stochastic dynamics simulations of the alanine dipeptide using a solvent modified potential energy surface. J Phys Chem 1993;97:6907-6913.
66. Magnusson U, Chaudhuri BN, Ko J, Park C, Jones TA, Mowbray SL. Hinge-bending motion of D-Allose-binding protein from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 2002;277:14077-14084.
67. Millet O, Hudson RP, Kay LE. The energetic cost of domain reorientation in maltose-binding proteins as studied by NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:12700-12705.
68. Careaga CL, Sutherland J, Sabeti J, Falke JJ. Large amplitude twisting motions of an interdomain hinge: a disulphide trapping study of the galactose-glucose binding protein. Biochemistry 1995;34:3048-3055.
69. Sharff AJ, Rodseth LE, Spurlino JC, Quicho FA. Crystallographic evidence of a large ligand-induced hinge-twist motion between the two domains of the maltodextrin binding protein involved in active transport and chemotaxis. Biochemistry 1992;31:10657-10663.
70. Smith LJ, Daura X, Van Gunsteren WF. Assessing equilibration and convergence in biomolecular simulations. Proteins 2002;48:487-496.
71. Daidone I, Roccatano D, Hayward S. Investigating the accessibility of the closed domain conformation of citrate synthase using essential dynamics sampling. J Mol Biol 2004;339:515-525.
72. Mayer ML, Armstrong N. Structure and function of glutamate receptor ion channels. Annu Rev Physiol 2004;66:161-181.
73. Benson DE, Conrad DW, de Lorimier RM, Trammell SA, Hellinga HW. Design of bioelectronic interfaces by exploiting hinge-bending motions in proteins. Science 2001;293:1641-1644.
74. De Lorimer RM, Smith JJ, Dwyer MA, Looger LL, Sali KM, Paavola CD, Rizk SS, Sadigov S, Conrad DW, Loew L, Hellinga HW. Construction of a fluorescent biosensor family. Protein Sci 2002;11:2655-2675.