Deciphering the mechanism of protein interaction with silk fibroin for drug delivery systems

Biomaterials

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 3427-3434

  Germershaus, Oliver ^a   Werner, Vera ^a   Kutscher, Marika ^a   Meinel, Lorenz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Drug delivery of biologics; Mechanism of interaction; Silk fibroin; Thermodynamics

Indexed keywords

DRUG DELIVERY CARRIER; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; MODEL PROTEINS; NANOPARTICLE TRACKING ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SILK FIBROIN; STATIC LIGHT SCATTERING; STRUCTURAL BREAKDOWN;

PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

DRUG DELIVERY;

DRUG CARRIER; FLUORESCENT DYE; POLYLYSINE; PROTAMINE; SILK FIBROIN; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE;

ARTICLE; COLLOID; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; HYDROPHOBICITY; IONIC STRENGTH; ISOTHERMAL TITRATION CALORIMETRY; LIGHT SCATTERING; MICROSCOPIC PARTICLE ANALYSIS; MICROSCOPY; NANOANALYSIS; NANOPARTICLE TRACKING ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; STATIC LIGHT SCATTERING; ZETA POTENTIAL;

DRUG DELIVERY OF BIOLOGICS; MECHANISM OF INTERACTION; SILK FIBROIN; THERMODYNAMICS;

CALORIMETRY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; FIBROINS; POLYLYSINE; PROTAMINES; PROTEIN BINDING; SILK; SPECTROMETRY, FLUORESCENCE;

EID: 84893710225     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.083     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Wenk E., Merkle H.P., Meinel L. Silk fibroin as a vehicle for drug delivery applications. J Control Release 2011, 150:128-141.
2. Mathiowitz E. Encyclopedia of controlled drug delivery 1999, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NY.
3. Fu K., Klibanov A.M., Langer R. Protein stability in controlled-release systems. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18:24-25.
4. Hofmann S., Hagenmueller H., Koch A.M., Mueller R., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Kaplan D.L., et al. Control of in vitro tissue-engineered bone-like structures using human mesenchymal stem cells and porous silk scaffolds. Biomaterials 2006, 28:1152-1162.
5. Kirker-Head C., Karageorgiou V., Hofmann S., Fajardo R., Betz O., Merkle H.P., et al. BMP-silk composite matrices heal critically sized femoral defects. Bone 2007, 41:247-255.
6. Meinel L., Kaplan D.L. Silk constructs for delivery of musculoskeletal therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2012, 64:1111-1122.
7. Uebersax L., Mattotti M., Papaloizos M., Merkle H.P., Gander B., Meinel L. Silk fibroin matrices for the controlled release of nerve growth factor (NGF). Biomaterials 2007, 28:4449-4460.
8. Uebersax L., Merkle H.P., Meinel L. Insulin-like growth factor I releasing silk fibroin scaffolds induce chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Control Release 2008, 127:12-21.
9. Wenk E., Wandrey A.J., Merkle H.P., Meinel L. Silk fibroin spheres as a platform for controlled drug delivery. J Control Release 2008, 132:26-34.
10. Pritchard E.M., Kaplan D.L. Silk fibroin biomaterials for controlled release drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2011, 8:797-811.
11. Guziewicz N.A., Massetti A.J., Perez-Ramirez B.J., Kaplan D.L. Mechanisms of monoclonal antibody stabilization and release from silk biomaterials. Biomaterials 2013, 34:7766-7775.
12. Vollrath F. Spider silk: evolution and 400 million years of spinning, waiting, snagging, and mating. Nature 2010, 466:319.
13. Vollrath F., Knight D.P. Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature 2001, 410:541-548.
14. Wenk E., Murphy A.R., Kaplan D.L., Meinel L., Merkle H.P., Uebersax L. The use of sulfonated silk fibroin derivatives to control binding, delivery and potency of FGF-2 in tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 2010, 31:1403-1413.
15. Uebersax L., Hagenmuller H., Hofmann S., Gruenblatt E., Muller R., Vunjak-Novakovic G., et al. Effect of scaffold design on bone morphology in vitro. Tissue Eng 2006, 12:3417-3429.
16. Asakura T. Characteristics of the structure of silk fibroins and its application to enzyme immobilization. Bio Ind 1987, 4:878-886.
17. Altman G.H., Diaz F., Jakuba C., Calabro T., Horan R.L., Chen J., et al. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 2002, 24:401-416.
18. Heim M., Keerl D., Scheibel T. Spider silk: from soluble protein to extraordinary fiber. Angew Chem Int Ed 2009, 48:3584-3596.
19. Scheibel T. Protein fibers as performance proteins: new technologies and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005, 16:427-433.
20. Acharya C., Ghosh S.K., Kundu S.C. Silk fibroin protein from mulberry and non-mulberry silkworms: cytotoxicity, biocompatibility and kinetics of L929 murine fibroblast adhesion. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008, 19:2827-2836.
21. Meinel L., Hofmann S., Karageorgiou V., Kirker-Head C., McCool J., Gronowicz G., et al. The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 2005, 26:147-155.
22. Sell S.A., McClure M.J., Garg K., Wolfe P.S., Bowlin G.L. Electrospinning of collagen/biopolymers for regenerative medicine and cardiovascular tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2009, 61:1007-1019.
23. Wang Y., Kim H.-J., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Kaplan D.L. Stem cell-based tissue engineering with silk biomaterials. Biomaterials 2006, 27:6064-6082.
24. Karageorgiou V., Meinel L., Hofmann S., Malhotra A., Volloch V., Kaplan D. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 decorated silk fibroin films induce osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2004, 71A:528-537.
25. Guziewicz N., Best A., Perez-Ramirez B., Kaplan D.L. Lyophilized silk fibroin hydrogels for the sustained local delivery of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Biomaterials 2011, 32:2642-2650.
26. Matsumoto A., Chen J., Collette A.L., Kim U.-J., Altman G.H., Cebe P., et al. Mechanisms of silk fibroin sol-gel transitions. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110:21630-21638.
27. Lammel A.S., Hu X., Park S.-H., Kaplan D.L., Scheibel T.R. Controlling silk fibroin particle features for drug delivery. Biomaterials 2010, 31:4583-4591.
28. Grigsby J.J., Blanch H.W., Prausnitz J.M. Effect of secondary structure on the potential of mean force for poly-l-lysine in the α-helix and β-sheet conformations. Biophys Chem 2002, 99:107-116.
29. Awotwe-Otoo D., Agarabi C., Keire D., Lee S., Raw A., Yu L., et al. Physicochemical characterization of complex drug substances: evaluation of structural similarities and differences of protamine sulfate from various sources. AAPS J 2012, 14:619-626.
30. Meinel L., Hofmann S., Karageorgiou V., Zichner L., Langer R., Kaplan D., et al. Engineering cartilage-like tissue using human mesenchymal stem cells and silk protein scaffolds. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004, 88:379-391.
31. Kunz W., Lo N.P., Ninham B.W. The present state of affairs with Hofmeister effects. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2004, 9:1-18.
32. Perez-Jimenez R., Godoy-Ruiz R., Ibarra-Molero B., Sanchez-Ruiz J.M. The efficiency of different salts to screen charge interactions in proteins: a Hofmeister effectα. Biophys J 2004, 86:2414-2429.
33. Record M.T., Guinn E., Pegram L., Capp M. Introductory lecture: interpreting and predicting Hofmeister salt ion and solute effects on biopolymer and model processes using the solute partitioning model. Faraday Discuss 2013, 160:9-44.
34. Zhang Y., Cremer P.S. Interactions between macromolecules and ions: the Hofmeister series. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2006, 10:658-663.
35. Vepari C., Kaplan D.L. Silk as a biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci 2007, 32:991-1007.
36. Toffanin S., Kim S., Cavallini S., Natali M., Benfenati V., Amsden J.J., et al. Low-threshold blue lasing from silk fibroin thin films. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 101. 091110/1-/4.
37. Omenetto F.G., Kaplan D.L. A new route for silk. Nat Phot 2008, 2:641-643.
38. Meinel L., Fajardo R., Hofmann S., Langer R., Chen J., Snyder B., et al. Silk implants for the healing of critical size bone defects. Bone 2005, 37:688-698.
39. Becker A.L., Henzler K., Welsch N., Ballauff M., Borisov O. Proteins and polyelectrolytes: a charged relationship. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2012, 17:90-96.
40. Bungenberg de Jong H.G. Crystallisation-coacervation-flocculation. Colloid science 1949, 232-258. Elsevier, Amsterdam. H.R. Kruyt (Ed.).
41. Chollakup R., Beck J.B., Dirnberger K., Tirrell M., Eisenbach C.D. Polyelectrolyte molecular weight and salt effects on the phase behavior and coacervation of aqueous solutions of poly(acrylic acid) sodium salt and poly(allylamine) hydrochloride. Macromolecules 2013, 46:2376-2390.
42. de K.C.G., Weinbreck F., de V.R. Complex coacervation of proteins and anionic polysaccharides. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2004, 9:340-349.
43. Priftis D., Laugel N., Tirrell M. Thermodynamic characterization of polypeptide complex coacervation. Langmuir 2012, 28:15947-15957.
44. Turgeon S.L., Beaulieu M., Schmitt C., Sanchez C. Protein-polysaccharide interactions: phase-ordering kinetics, thermodynamic and structural aspects. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2003, 8:401-414.
45. Chang Y., McLandsborough L., McClements D.J. Interactions of a cationic antimicrobial (ε-polylysine) with an anionic biopolymer (pectin): an isothermal titration calorimetry, microelectrophoresis, and turbidity study. J Agric Food Chem 2011, 59:5579-5588.
46. Jin H.-J., Kaplan D.L. Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature 2003, 424:1057-1061.
47. Nielsen A.D., Arleth L., Westh P. Analysis of protein-surfactant interactions-a titration calorimetric and fluorescence spectroscopic investigation of interactions between Humicola insolens cutinase and an anionic surfactant. Biochim Biophys Acta-Proteins Proteomics 2005, 1752:124-132.
48. U.S.Food and Drug Administration Generally recognized as safe (GRAS) - alphabetical list of SCOGS substances 2013, FDA, Silver Spring, MD, Available from: URL:. http://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/GRAS/SCOGS/ucm084104.htm.
49. Exler J.H., Huemmerich D., Scheibel T. The amphiphilic properties of spider silks are important for spinning. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007, 46:3559-3562.
50. Geisler M., Pirzer T., Ackerschott C., Lud S., Garrido J., Scheibel T., et al. Hydrophobic and Hofmeister effects on the adhesion of spider silk proteins onto solid substrates: an AFM-based single-molecule study. Langmuir 2008, 24:1350-1355.
51. Eisoldt L., Hardy J.G., Heim M., Scheibel T.R. The role of salt and shear on the storage and assembly of spider silk proteins. J Struct Biol 2010, 170:413-419.
52. Knight D.P., Vollrath F. Changes in element composition along the spinning duct in a Nephila spider. Naturwissenschaften 2001, 88:179-182.
53. Malmsten M., Lindman B. Self-assembly in aqueous block copolymer solutions. Macromolecules 1992, 25:5440-5445.
54. Chiappetta D.A., Sosnik A. Poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide) block copolymer micelles as drug delivery agents: improved hydrosolubility, stability and bioavailability of drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007, 66:303-317.