Facilitating myoelectric-control with transcranial direct current stimulation: A preliminary study in healthy humans

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Dutta, Anirban ^a,b   Paulus, Walter ^a   Nitsche, Michael A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b LIRMM   (France)

Author keywords

Brain machine interfaces; Functional electrical stimulation; Myoelectric control; Stroke; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBELLUM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECT CURRENT; ELECTROMYOGRAM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR CORTEX; PHYSIOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CEREBELLUM; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84893692135     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-13     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Functional electrical stimulation for ambulation by paraplegics. Graupe D, Kohn K, University of Michigan, USA: Krieger Publishing Company 1994 113 115
2. Kralj A, Bajd T, Functional Electrical Stimulation: Standing and Walking After Spinal Cord Injury Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press 1989 123 177
3. Biopotentials as command and feedback signals in functional electrical stimulation systems. Sinkjaer T, Haugland M, Inmann A, Hansen M, Nielsen KD, Med Eng Phys 2003 25 1 29 40 10.1016/S1350-4533(02)00178-9 12485784 (Pubitemid 35453964)
4. Delay in initiation and termination of tibialis anterior contraction in lower-limb hemiparesis: relationship to lower-limb motor impairment and mobility. Chae J, Quinn A, El-Hayek K, Santing J, Berezovski R, Harley M, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006 87 9 1230 1234 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.007 16935060 (Pubitemid 44277939)
5. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. Nitsche MA, Paulus W, J Physiol 2000 527 3 633 639 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x 10990547
6. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Neurology 2001 57 10 1899 1901 10.1212/WNL.57.10.1899 11723286 (Pubitemid 33096705)
7. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Liebetanz D, Nitsche MA, Tergau F, Paulus W, Brain 2002 125 10 2238 2247 10.1093/brain/awf238 12244081
8. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation-technical, safety and functional aspects. Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W, Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2003 56 255 276 14677403
9. Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity by general network excitability in the human motor cortex. Nitsche MA, Roth A, Kuo MF, Fischer AK, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W, J Neurosci 2007 27 14 3807 3812 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5348-06.2007 17409245 (Pubitemid 46557680)
10. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W, Tergau F, J Cogn Neurosci 2003 15 4 619 626 10.1162/089892903321662994 12803972 (Pubitemid 36530095)
11. Direct current stimulation over MT+/V5 modulates motion aftereffect in humans. Antal A, Varga ET, Nitsche MA, Chadaide Z, Paulus W, Kovács G, Vidnyánszky Z, Neuroreport 2004 15 16 2491 2494 10.1097/00001756- 200411150-00012 15538181 (Pubitemid 39579339)
12. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, Wagner T, Ferreira MJ, Lima MC, Rigonatti SP, Marcolin MA, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Neuroreport 2005 16 14 1551 1555 10.1097/01.wnr.0000177010.44602.5e 16148743 (Pubitemid 41783121)
13. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu WH, Gerloff C, Cohen LG, Brain 2005 128 3 490 499 10.1093/brain/awh369 15634731 (Pubitemid 40380185)
14. Neuroplasticity and rehabilitation. Hallett M, J Rehabil Res Dev 2005 42(4 v xxii
15. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery. Schlaug G, Renga V, Expert Rev Med Devices 2008 5 6 759 768 10.1586/17434440.5.6.759 19025351
16. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Schlaug G, Renga V, Nair D, Arch Neurol 2008 65 12 1571 1576 19064743
17. Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Tanaka S, Hanakawa T, Honda M, Watanabe K, Exp Brain Res 2009 196 3 459 465 10.1007/s00221-009-1863-9 19479243
18. Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances fine motor control of the hemiparetic ankle: implications for rehabilitation. Madhavan S, Weber KA, Stinear JW, Exp Brain Res 2011 209 1 9 17 10.1007/s00221-010-2511-0 21170708
19. Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation. Galea JM, Jayaram G, Ajagbe L, Celnik P, J Neurosci 2009 29 28 9115 9122 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2184-09.2009 19605648
20. Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. Galea JM, Vazquez A, Pasricha N, de Xivry JJ, Celnik P, Cereb Cortex 2011 21 8 1761 1770 10.1093/cercor/bhq246 21139077
21. Internal models in the cerebellum. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M, Trends Cogn Sci 1998 2 9 338 347 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01221-2 21227230 (Pubitemid 28396569)
22. Shadmehr R, Wise SP, Computational Neurobiology of Reaching and Pointing: A Foundation for Motor Learning Cambridge: MIT Press 2005
23. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Shadmehr R, Krakauer JW, Exp Brain Res 2008 185 3 359 381 10.1007/s00221-008-1280-5 18251019
24. The surface EMG-force relationship during isometric dorsiflexion in males and females. Lenhardt SA, McIntosh KC, Gabriel DA, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2009 49 5 227 234 19694210
25. Development of an electromyogram-based controller for functional electrical stimulation assisted walking after partial paralysis. Dutta A, PhD Thesis Cleveland, USA: Case Western Reserve University, Biomedical Engineering Department 2009
26. An objective method for selecting command sources for myoelectrically triggered lower-limb neuroprostheses. Dutta A, Kobetic R, Triolo RJ, J Rehabil Res Dev 2011 48 8 935 948 10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0141 22068372
27. Autogenic EMG-controlled functional electrical stimulation for ankle dorsiflexion control. Yeom H, Chang YH, J Neurosci Methods 2010 193 1 118 125 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.08.011 20713086
28. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex. Jeffery DT, Norton JA, Roy FD, Gorassini MA, Exp Brain Res 2007 182 2 281 287 10.1007/s00221-007-1093-y 17717651 (Pubitemid 350218897)
29. The psychophysics toolbox. Brainard DH, Spat Vis 1997 10 433 436 10.1163/156856897X00357 9176952 (Pubitemid 127582520)
30. The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Pelli DG, Spat Vis 1997 10 437 442 10.1163/156856897X00366 9176953 (Pubitemid 127582521)
31. What's new in Psychtoolbox-3? Kleiner M, Brainard D, Pelli D, Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Visual Perception Arezzo, Italy 2007
32. Learning a novel myoelectric-controlled interface task. Radhakrishnan SM, Baker SN, Jackson A, J Neurophysiol 2008 100 4 2397 2408 10.1152/jn.90614.2008 18667540
33. Mechanisms of skill acqusition and the law of practice. Newell A, Rosenbloom P, Cognitive skills and their acquisition Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, Anderson JR, 1981 1 55
34. Motor control. Wise SP, Shadmehr R, Encyclopedia of the human brain. Volume 3 USA: Elsevier 2002 1 21
35. Cerebellar processing of sensory inputs primes motor cortex plasticity. Popa T, Velayudhan B, Hubsch C, Pradeep S, Roze E, Vidailhet M, Meunier S, Kishore A, Cereb Cortex 2013 23 2 305 314 10.1093/cercor/bhs016 22351647
36. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI, Science 1995 269 5232 1880 1882 10.1126/science.7569931 7569931
37. Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields. Bhushan N, Shadmehr R, Biol Cybern 1999 81 1 39 60 10.1007/s004220050543 10434390 (Pubitemid 129543166)
38. Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation. Marko MK, Haith AM, Harran MD, Shadmehr R, J Neurophysiol 2012 108 6 1752 1763 10.1152/jn.00177.2012 22773782
39. cerebellar brain inhibition is decreased in active and surround muscles at the onset of voluntary movement. Kassavetis P, Hoffland BS, Saifee TA, Bhatia KP, van de Warrenburg BP, Rothwell JC, Edwards MJ, Exp Brain Res 2011 209 3 437 442 10.1007/s00221-011-2575-5 21305376
40. Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation-a consensus paper. Grimaldi G, Argyropoulos GP, Boehringer A, Celnik P, Edwards MJ, Ferrucci R, Galea JM, Groiss SJ, Hiraoka K, Kassavetis P, Lesage E, Manto M, Miall RC, Priori A, Sadnicka A, Ugawa Y, Ziemann U, Cerebellum 2013 in press
41. Adaptation to visuomotor rotation and force field perturbation is correlated to different brain areas in patients with cerebellar degeneration. Rabe K, Livne O, Gizewski ER, Aurich V, Beck A, Timmann D, Donchin O, J Neurophysiol 2009 101 4 1961 1971 10.1152/jn.91069.2008 19176608
42. cerebellar regions involved in adaptation to force field and visuomotor perturbation. Donchin O, Rabe K, Diedrichsen J, Lally N, Schoch B, Gizewski ER, Timmann D, J Neurophysiol 2012 107 1 134 147 10.1152/jn.00007.2011 21975446