Cerebellar regions involved in adaptation to force field and visuomotor perturbation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 134-147

  Donchin, Opher ^a,b   Rabe, Kasja ^c   Diedrichsen, Jörn ^d,e   Lally, Níall ^e   Schoch, Beate ^f   Gizewski, Elke Ruth ^c   Timmann, Dagmar ^c  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f Department of Neurosurgery ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Cerebellar structures; Motor learning; Voxel based morphometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBELLUM; CEREBELLUM DEGENERATION; CEREBELLUM INFARCTION; CEREBELLUM INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FORCE FIELD PERTURBATION; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY;

EID: 84255171228     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00007.2011     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Andrieu C. An introduction to MCMC for machine learning. Mach Learn 50: 5-43, 2003.
2. Apps R, Hawkes R. Cerebellar cortical organization: a one-map hypothesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 670-681, 2009.
3. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry-the methods. Neuro-image 11: 805-821, 2000.
4. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26: 839-851, 2005.
5. Baizer JS, Kralj-Hans I, Glickstein M. Cerebellar lesions and prism adaptation in macaque monkeys. J Neurophysiol 81: 1960-1965, 1999.
6. Bloedel JR, Courville J. Cerebellar afferent systems. In: Handbook of Physiology, edited by Brooks VB. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1981, p. 735-830.
7. Brandauer B, Hermsdörfer J, Beck A, Aurich V, Gizewski ER, Mar-quardt C, Timmann D. Impairments of prehension kinematics and grasping forces in patients with cerebellar degeneration and the relationship to cerebellar atrophy. Clin Neurophysiol 119: 2528-2537, 2008.
8. Brodal A. Cerebellum. In: Neurological Anatomy in Relation to Clinical Medicine (3rd ed.), edited by Brodal A. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
9. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Bastian AJ, Shadmehr R. Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning. J Neurophysiol 103: 2275-2284, 2010.
10. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Donchin O, Gazzaniga MS, Shadmehr R. Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. J Neurophysiol 89: 168-176, 2003.
11. Della-Maggiore V, Scholz J, Johansen-Berg H, Paus T. The rate of visuo-motor adaptation correlates with cerebellar white-matter microstructure. Hum Brain Mapp 30: 4048-4053, 2009.
12. Diedrichsen J. A spatially unbiased atlas template of the human cerebellum. Neuroimage 33: 127-138, 2006.
13. Diedrichsen J, Hashambhoy Y, Rane T, Shadmehr R. Neural correlates of reach errors. J Neurosci 25: 9919-9931, 2005.
14. Diedrichsen J, Balsters JH, Flavell J, Cussans E, Ramnani N. A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum. Neuroimage 46: 39-46, 2009.
15. Diedrichsen J, Maderwald S, Küper M, Thürling M, Rabe K, Gizewski ER, Ladd ME, Timmann D. Imaging the deep cerebellar nuclei: a probabilistic atlas and normalization procedure. Neuroimage 54: 1786-1794, 2011.
16. Dimitrova A, Zeljko D, Schwarze F, Maschke M, Gerwig M, Frings M, Beck A, Aurich V, Forsting M, Timmann D. Probabilistic 3D MRI atlas of the human cerebellar dentate/interposed nuclei. Neuroimage 30: 12-25, 2006.
17. Donchin O, Francis JT, Shadmehr R. Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control. J Neurosci 23: 9032-9045, 2003.
18. Ekerot CF, Jorntell H. Parallel fiber receptive fields: a key to understanding cerebellar operation and learning. Cerebellum 2: 101-109, 2003.
19. Flanagan JR, Rao AK. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurophysiol 74: 2174-2178, 1995.
20. Garwicz M. Micro-organisation of cerebellar modules controlling forelimb movements. Prog Brain Res 124: 187-199, 2000.
21. Graydon FX, Friston KJ, Thomas CG, Brooks VB, Menon RS. Learning-related fMRI activation associated with a rotational visuo-motor transformation. Cogn Brain Res 22: 373-383, 2005.
22. Glickstein M, Sultan F, Voogd J. Functional localization in the cerebellum. Cortex 47: 59-80, 2011.
23. Grodd W, Hulsmann E, Lotze M, Wildgruber D, Erb M. Sensorimotor mapping of the human cerebellum: fMRI evidence of somatotopic organization. Hum Brain Mapp 13: 55-73, 2001.
24. Hadipour-Niktarash A, Lee CK, Desmond JE, Shadmehr R. Impairment of retention but not acquisition of a visuomotor skill through time-dependent disruption of primary motor cortex. J Neurosci 27:13413-13419, 2007.
25. Hwang EJ, Shadmehr R. Internal models of limb dynamics and the encoding of limb state. J Neural Eng 2: 266-278, 2005.
26. Imamizu H, Miyauchi S, Tamada T, Sasaki Y, Takino R, Putz B, Yoshioka T, Kawato M. Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature 403: 192-195, 2000.
27. Karnath HO, Himmelbach M, Rorden C. The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar. Brain 125: 350-360, 2002.
28. Kelly PJ, Stein J, Shafqat S, Eskey C, Doherty D, Chang Y, Kurina A, Furie KL. Functional recovery after rehabilitation for cerebellar stroke. Stroke 32: 530-534, 2001.
29. Kelly RM, Strick PL. Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J Neurosci 23: 8432-8444, 2003.
30. Konczak J, Timmann D. The effect of damage to the cerebellum on sensorimotor and cognitive function in children and adolescents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31: 1101-1113, 2007.
31. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2: 1026-1031, 1999.
32. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Mentis M, Barnes A, Veytsman M, Eidelberg D, Ghez C. Differential cortical and subcortical activations in learning rotations and gains for reaching: a PET study. J Neurophysiol 91: 924-933, 2004.
33. Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20: 8916-8924, 2000.
34. Luaute J, Schwartz S, Rossetti Y, Spiridon M, Rode G, Boisson D, Vuilleumier P. Dynamic changes in brain activity during prism adaptation. J Neurosci 29: 169-178, 2009.
35. Manni E, Petrosini L. A century of cerebellar somatotopy: a debated representation. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 241-249, 2004.
36. Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT. Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. Brain 119: 1183-1198, 1996.
37. Maschke M, Gomez CM, Ebner TJ, Konczak J. Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements. J Neurophysiol 91: 230-238, 2004.
38. Nezafat R, Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH. Long-term adaptation to dynamics of reaching movements: a PET study. Exp Brain Res 140: 66-76, 2001.
39. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113, 1971.
40. Pine ZM, Krakauer JW, Gordon J, Ghez C. Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. Neuroreport 7: 2357-2361, 1996.
41. Pisella L, Rossetti Y, Michel C, Rode G, Boisson D, Pelisson D, Tilikete C. Ipsidirectional impairment of prism adaptation after unilateral lesion of anterior cerebellum. Neurology 65: 150-152, 2005.
42. Prevosto V, Graf W, Ugolini G. Cerebellar inputs to intraparietal cortex areas LIP and MIP: functional frameworks for adaptive control of eye movements, reaching, and arm/eye/head movement coordination. Cereb Cortex 20: 214-228, 2010.
43. Rabe K, Livne O, Gizewski ER, Aurich V, Beck A, Timmann D, Donchin O. Adaptation to visuomotor rotation and force field perturbation is correlated to different brain areas in patients with cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol 101: 1961-1971, 2009.
44. Rorden C, Fridriksson J, Karnath HO. An evaluation of traditional and novel tools for lesion behavior mapping. Neuroimage 44: 1355-1362, 2009.
45. Rorden C, Karnath HO. Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 813-819, 2004.
46. Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain 121: 561-579, 1998.
47. Schmitz-Hubsch T, du Montcel ST, Baliko L, Berciano J, Boesch S, Depondt C, Giunti P, Globas C, Infante J, Kang JS, Kremer B, Mariotti C, Melegh B, Pandolfo M, Rakowicz M, Ribai P, Rola R, Schöls L, Szymanski S, van de Warrenburg BP, Dürr A, Klockgether T, Fancellu R. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology 66: 1717-1720, 2006.
48. Seidler RD, Noll DC. Neuroanatomical correlates of motor acquisition and motor transfer. J Neurophysiol 99: 1836-1845, 2008.
49. Shadmehr R, Donchin O, Hwang EJ, Hemminger SE, Rao A. Learning dynamics of reaching. In: Motor Cortex in Voluntary Movements: A Distributed System for Distributed Functions, edited by Riehle A, Vaadia E. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2005, p. 297-328.
50. Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH. Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science 277: 821-825, 1997.
51. Shadmehr R, Moussavi ZM. Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements. J Neurosci 20: 7807-7815, 2000.
52. Sing GC, Smith MA. Reduction in learning rates associated with anterograde interference results from interactions between different timescales in motor adaptation. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000893, 2010.
53. Smith MA, Shadmehr R. Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neu-rophysiol 93: 2809-2821, 2005.
54. Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage 44: 489-501, 2009.
55. Timmann D, Konczak J, Ilg W, Donchin O, Hermsdorfer J, Gizewski ER, Schoch B. Current advances in lesion-symptom mapping of the human cerebellum. Neuroscience 162: 836-851, 2009.
56. Tohgi H, Takahashi S, Chiba K, Hirata Cerebellar infarction Y. Clinical and neuroimaging analysis in 293 patients. The Tohoku Cerebellar Infarction Study Group. Stroke 24: 1697-1701, 1993.
57. Tseng YW, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol 98: 54-62, 2007.
58. Weiner MJ, Hallett M, Funkenstein HH. Adaptation to lateral displacement of vision in patients with lesions of the central nervous system. Neurology 33: 766-772, 1983.
59. Werner S, Bock O, Gizewski ER, Schoch B, Timmann D. Visuomotor adaptive improvement and aftereffects are impaired differentially following cerebellar lesions in SCA and PICA territory. Exp Brain Res 201: 429-439, 2010.
60. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res 103: 460-470, 1995.