Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign and malignant breast lesions before and after contrast enhancement

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 186, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 130-135

  Janka, R ^a   Hammon, M ^a   Geppert, C ^b   Nothhelfer, A ^a   Uder, M ^a   Wenkel, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

breast; contrast media; diffusion weighted MR imaging

Indexed keywords

FAT; GADOBUTROL; CONTRAST MEDIUM; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; COLLOID CARCINOMA; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTIC FIBROSIS; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC USE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84893686071     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350298     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Benndorf M., Baltzer P. A., Vag T. et al. Acta Radiol. 2010; 51 715 721
2. Mahoney M. C., Gatsonis C., Hanna L. et al. Radiology. 2012; 264 51 58
3. Bick U., Engelken F., Diederichs G. et al. MRI of the Breast as Part of the Assessment in Population-Based Mammography Screening. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2013; [Epub ahead of print]
4. Siegmann K. C., Moron H. U., Baur A. et al. Diagnostic value of a breast MRI score for the prediction of malignancy of breast lesions detected solely with MRI. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2009; 181 556 563
5. Dietzel M., Baltzer P. A., Vag T. et al. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr: 2011; 183 126 135
6. Kul S., Cansu A., Alhan E. et al. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. Am J Roentgenol Am J Roentgenol: 2011; 196 210 217
7. Partridge S. C., Mullins C. D., Kurland B. F. et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. Am J Roentgenol Am J Roentgenol: 2010; 194 1664 1673
8. Pinker K., Bickel H., Helbich T. H. et al. Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions. Eur Radiol: 2013; [Epub ahead of print]
9. Baltzer P. A., Benndorf M., Dietzel M. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions. Eur Radiol: 2010; 20 1101 1110
10. Guo Y., Cai Y. Q., Cai Z. L. et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2002; 16 172 178 (Pubitemid 34810055)
11. Rubesova E., Grell A. S., De Maertelaer V. et al. Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2006; 24 319 324 (Pubitemid 44188557)
12. Sinha S., Lucas-Quesada F. A., Sinha U. et al. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2002; 15 693 704 (Pubitemid 34606504)
13. Wenkel E., Geppert C., Schulz-Wendtland R. et al. Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. Acad Radiol: 2007; 14 1077 1083 (Pubitemid 47260686)
14. Yabuuchi H., Matsuo Y., Okafuji T. et al. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2008; 28 1157 1165
15. Pickles M. D., Gibbs P., Lowry M. et al. Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging: 2006; 24 843 847 (Pubitemid 44205378)
16. Yankeelov T. E., Lepage M., Chakravarthy A. et al. Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging: 2007; 25 1 13 (Pubitemid 46048940)
17. Tsushima Y., Takahashi-Taketomi A., Endo K. Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2009; 30 249 255
18. Geppert C., Wenkel E., Bautz W. et al. Enhanced lesion discrimination in breast DWI after contrast administration. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM Toronto: 2008
19. Yuen S., Yamada K., Goto M. et al. Microperfusion-induced elevation of ADC is suppressed after contrast in breast carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2009; 29 1080 1084
20. Yamada K., Kubota H., Kizu O. et al. Effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted images: evaluation of normal brain and infarcts. Stroke: 2002; 33 1799 1802 (Pubitemid 34761064)
21. Fitzek C., Mentzel H. J., Fitzek S. et al. Echoplanar diffusion-weighted MRI with intravenous gadolinium-DTPA. Neuroradiology: 2003; 45 592 597 (Pubitemid 37236178)
22. Firat A. K., Sanli B., Karakas H. M. et al. The effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted imaging. Neuroradiology: 2006; 48 465 470 (Pubitemid 43986225)
23. Ramadan S., Mulkern R. V. Comment on ADC reductions in postcontrast breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2010; 31 262; author reply 263-264
24. Woodhams R., Kakita S., Hata H. et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings. Am J Roentgenol Am J Roentgenol: 2009; 193 260 266
25. Hatakenaka M., Soeda H., Yabuuchi H. et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci: 2008; 7 23 29
26. Partridge S. C., DeMartini W. B., Kurland B. F. et al. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. Am J Roentgenol Am J Roentgenol: 2009; 193 1716 1722
27. Woodhams R., Matsunaga K., Iwabuchi K. et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr: 2005; 29 644 649 (Pubitemid 41395779)
28. Woodhams R., Matsunaga K., Kan S. et al. ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci: 2005; 4 35 42
29. Le Bihan D., Poupon C., Amadon A. et al. Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging: 2006; 24 478 488 (Pubitemid 44320549)
30. Geppert C., Feiweiher T., Janka R. et al. Reduction of image distortions in breast DWI using dynamic field correction: impact on ADC assessment. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of ESMRMB. Leipzig: 2011
31. ACR Practice Guideline for the Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Breast Res. 25 ed: 2008
32. Mann R. M., Kuhl C. K., Kinkel K. et al. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol: 2008; 18 1307 1318