Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1101-1110

  Baltzer, Pascal A T ^a   Benndorf, Matthias ^a   Dietzel, Matthias ^a   Gajda, Mieczyslaw ^a   Camara, Oumar ^a   Kaiser, Werner A ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast; DCE MRI; DWI; MRI; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER MORPHOLOGY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 77952095385     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1654-5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. C Kuhl 2007 The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice Radiology 244 356 378 10.1148/radiol.2442051620 17641361 (Pubitemid 47080868)
2. CK Kuhl 2007 Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications Radiology 244 672 691 10.1148/radiol.2443051661 17709824 (Pubitemid 47292079)
3. CK Kuhl S Schrading S Weigel, et al. 2005 [The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (mammography, ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period] Rofo 177 818 827 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzgvFKitA%3D%3D 15902631
4. MO Leach CR Boggis AK Dixon, et al. 2005 Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) Lancet 365 1769 1778 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66646-9 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3mvFCqtg%3D%3D 15910949
5. R Agarwal SM Brunelli K Williams, et al. 2008 Gadolinium-based contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nephrol Dial Transplant 10.1093/ndt/gfn593 18952698
6. MF Bellin AJ Van Der Molen 2008 Extracellular gadolinium-based contrast media: an overview Eur J Radiol 66 160 167 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.023 18358659
7. PA Baltzer DM Renz KH Herrmann, et al. 2009 Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques Eur Radiol 10.1007/s00330-009-1326-5
8. Y Guo YQ Cai ZL Cai, et al. 2002 Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 16 172 178 10.1002/jmri.10140 12203765 (Pubitemid 34810055)
9. M Hatakenaka H Soeda H Yabuuchi, et al. 2008 Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application Magn Reson Med Sci 7 23 29 10.2463/mrms.7.23 18460845
10. T Kinoshita N Yashiro N Ihara, et al. 2002 Diffusion-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma J Comput Assist Tomogr 26 1042 1046 10.1097/00004728-200211000-00033 12488758 (Pubitemid 36076728)
11. Y Kuroki K Nasu S Kuroki, et al. 2004 Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value Magn Reson Med Sci 3 79 85 10.2463/mrms.3.79 16093623
12. S Kuroki-Suzuki Y Kuroki K Nasu, et al. 2007 Detecting breast cancer with non-contrast MR imaging: combining diffusion-weighted and STIR imaging Magn Reson Med Sci 6 21 27 10.2463/mrms.6.21 17510539
13. JD Luo YY Liu XL Zhang, et al. 2007 [Application of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to differential diagnosis of breast diseases] Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese Journal of Cancer 26 168 171 17298747
14. C Marini C Iacconi M Giannelli, et al. 2007 Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion Eur Radiol 17 2646 2655 10.1007/s00330-007-0621-2 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2srjvFegtw%3D%3D 17356840
15. A Matsuoka M Minato M Harada, et al. 2008 Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer Radiat Med 26 15 20 10.1007/s11604-007-0187-6 18236129 (Pubitemid 351928143)
16. MJ Park ES Cha BJ Kang, et al. 2007 The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors Korean J Radiol 8 390 396 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.5.390 17923781
17. E Rubesova AS Grell V De Maertelaer, et al. 2006 Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study J Magn Reson Imaging 24 319 324 10.1002/jmri.20643 16786565 (Pubitemid 44188557)
18. E Wenkel C Geppert R Schulz-Wendtland, et al. 2007 Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences Acad Radiol 14 1077 1083 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.006 17707315 (Pubitemid 47260686)
19. R Woodhams K Matsunaga K Iwabuchi, et al. 2005 Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension J Comput Assist Tomogr 29 644 649 10.1097/01.rct.0000171913.74086.1b 16163035 (Pubitemid 41395779)
20. R Woodhams K Matsunaga S Kan, et al. 2005 ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors Magn Reson Med Sci 4 35 42 10.2463/mrms.4.35 16127252
21. EM Charles-Edwards NM deSouza 2006 Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its application to cancer Cancer Imaging 6 135 143 10.1102/1470-7330.2006.0021 17015238
22. Y Kuroki K Nasu 2008 Advances in breast MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) 15 212 217
23. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kuhl CK et al (2003) MRI breast imaging reporting and data system atlas, 1st edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
24. A Malich DR Fischer S Wurdinger, et al. 2005 Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses AJR 185 964 970 10.2214/AJR.04.1073 16177416
25. DG Altman JM Bland 1994 Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity BMJ 308 1552 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3ptVajug%3D%3D 8019315
26. Altmann DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, New York
27. L Liberman EA Morris MJ Lee, et al. 2002 Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value AJR 179 171 178 12076929
28. M Tozaki K Fukuda 2006 High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors AJR 187 330 337 10.2214/AJR.05.0998 16861534 (Pubitemid 44148274)
29. G Chen SN Jespersen M Pedersen, et al. 2005 Intravenous administration of Gd-DTPA prior to DWI does not affect the apparent diffusion constant Magn Reson Imaging 23 685 689 10.1016/j.mri.2005.02.015 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmvVGisLo%3D 16051044 (Pubitemid 41033047)
30. C Fitzek HJ Mentzel S Fitzek, et al. 2003 Echoplanar diffusion-weighted MRI with intravenous gadolinium-DTPA Neuroradiology 45 592 597 10.1007/s00234-003-0965-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svksVKrtg%3D%3D 12923668 (Pubitemid 37236178)
31. K Yamada H Kubota O Kizu, et al. 2002 Effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted images: evaluation of normal brain and infarcts Stroke 33 1799 1802 10.1161/01.STR.0000020355.29423.61 12105356 (Pubitemid 34761064)
32. S Yuen K Yamada M Goto, et al. 2009 Microperfusion-induced elevation of ADC is suppressed after contrast in breast carcinoma J Magn Reson Imaging 29 1080 1084 10.1002/jmri.21743 19388115