Classmates With Disabilities and Students' Noncognitive Outcomes

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 20-43

  Gottfried, Michael A ^a  

^a LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

economics of education; moderating effects; peer effects; special education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893647349     PISSN: 01623737     EISSN: 19351062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0162373713493130     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aizer A.Peer effects and human capital accumulation: The externalities of ADD. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2008:.
2. Ammermueller A.,Pischke J.Peer effects in European primary schools: Evidence from PIRLS. Mannheim, Germany: ZEW; 2006:.
3. Argys L. M.,Rees D. I.,Brewer D. J.Detracking America's schools: Equity at zero cost?.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 1996;15:623-645.
4. Bradley R.,Doolittle J.,Bartolotta R.Building on the data and adding to the discussion: The experiences and outcomes of students with EBD.Journal of Behavioral Education. 2008;17:4-23.
5. Caldas S. J.Reexamination of input and process factor effects in public school achievement.Journal of Educational Research. 1993;86:206-214.
6. Chiteji N.Time-preference, non-cognitive skills and well-being across the life course: Do non-cognitive skills encourage healthy behavior?.American Economic Review. 2010;100:200-204.
7. Cho R. M.Are there peer effects associated with having English Language Learner (ELL) classmates? Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K).Economics of Education Review. 2012;31:629-643.
8. Cipani E.Inclusive education: What do we know and what do we still have to learn?.Exceptional Children. 1995;61:498-500.
9. Cohen M.School-age education programs for children with autism: The in-between years. Handleman J. S.Harris S. L., ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2006:305-325.
10. Daniel L. G.,King D. A.Impact of inclusion education on academic achievement, student behavior and self-esteem, and parental attitudes.Journal of Educational Research. 1997;91:67-80.
11. Dee T. S.,West M. R.The non-cognitive returns to class size.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2012;33:23-46.
12. Demaray M. K.,Ruffalo S. L.,Carlson J.,Busse R. T.,Olson A. E.Social skills assessment: A comparative evaluation of six published rating scales.School Psychology Review. 1995;24:648-671.
13. Downing J.,Eichinger J.,Williams L.Inclusive education for students with severe disabilities: Comparative views of principals and educators at different levels of implementation.Remedial and Special Education. 1997;18:133-142.
14. Duckworth A. L.,Seligman M. E. P.Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents.Psychological Science. 2005;16:939-944.
15. Duckworth A. L.,Seligman M. E. P.Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2006;98:198-208.
16. ErgenbrightK. (2010, August10). Special education students disciplined twice as often. The Texas Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.texastribune.org/texas-education/texas-education-agency/special-ed-students-disciplined-twice-as-often/.
17. Feng H.,Cartledge G.Social skill assessment of inner city Asian, African, and European American students.School Psychology Review. 1996;25:228-239.
18. Figlio D. N.Boys named Sue: Disruptive children and their peers.Education Finance and Policy. 2007;2:376-394.
19. Fletcher J.Spillover effects of inclusion of classmates with emotional problems on test scores in early elementary school.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2010;29:69-83.
20. Fletcher J. M.The effects of inclusion on classmates of students with special needs: The case of serious emotional problems.Education Finance and Policy. 2009;4:278-299.
21. Friesen J.,Hickey R.,Krauth B.Disabled peers and academic achievement.Education Finance and Policy. 2010;5:317-348.
22. Furlong M. J.,Karno M.Twelfth mental measurements yearbook. Conoley J. C.Impara J. C., ed. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement; 1995:697-969.
23. Gottfried A. W.,Gottfried A. E.,Bathurst K.,Guerin D.Gifted IQ: Early developmental aspects. New York, NY: Plenum; 1994:.
24. Gottfried M. A.Absent peers in elementary years: The negative classroom effects of unexcused absences on standardized testing outcomes.Teachers College Record. 2011;113:1597-1632.
25. Gottfried M. A.Peer effects in urban schools: Assessing the impact of classroom composition on student achievement.Educational Policy. 2012;:.
26. Greene R. W.,Beszterczey S. K.,Katenstein T.,Park K.,Goring J.Are students with ADD more stressful to teach?.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 2002;10:79-89.
27. Gresham F. M.,Elliott S. N.The social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1990:.
28. Hanushek E.,Kain J.,Rivkin S.Inferring program effects for special populations: Does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities?.Review of Economics and Statistics. 2002;84:584-599.
29. Haycock K.Thinking K-16. Washington, DC: The Education Trust; 1999:1-14.
30. Heckman J. J.Schools, skills, and synapses.Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International. 2008;46:289-324.
31. Heckman J. J.,Rubinstein Y.The importance of noncognitive skills: Lessons from the GED testing program.American Economic Review. 2001;91:145-149.
32. Herbst C. M.,Tekin E.Child care subsidies and child development.Economics of Education Review. 2010;29:618-638.
33. Hoxby C.The effects of class size on student achievement: New evidence from population variation.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2000;115:1239-1285.
34. Jennings J. L.,DiPrete T. A.Teacher effects on social and behavioral skills in early elementary school.Sociology of Education. 2010;83:135-159.
35. Juel C.Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.Journal of Educational Psychology. 1988;80:437-447.
36. Kern L.,Hilt-Panahon A.,Sokol N. G.Further examining the triangle tip: Improving support for students with emotional and behavioral needs.Psychology in the Schools. 2009;46:18-32.
37. Lazear E. P.Educational production.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2001;116:777-803.
38. Lipsky D. K.,Gartner A.National study on inclusion: Overview and summary report.National Center on Educational Restructuring and Inclusion Bulletin. 1995;2 (2): 1-8.
39. MacMillian D. L.,Gresham F. M.,Fornes S. R.Full inclusion: An empirical perspective.Behavioral Disorders. 1996;21:145-159.
40. McEwan P.Peer effects on student achievement: Evidence from Chile.Economics of Education Review. 2003;60:131-141.
41. Meisels S. J.,Atkins-Burnett S.,Nicholson J.Assessment of social competence, adaptive behaviors, and approaches to learning. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement; 1996:.
42. Morgan P. L.,Frisco M. L.,Farkas G.,Hibel J.A propensity score matching analysis of the effects of special education services.Journal of Special Education. 2010;43:236-254.
43. Morgan-D'Atrio C.,Northup J.,LaFleur I.,Spera S.Toward prescriptive alternatives to suspensions: A preliminary evaluation.Behavior Disorders. 1996;21:190-200.
44. Neidell M.,Waldfogel J.Cognitive and noncognitive peer effects in early education.The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2010;92:562-576.
45. Nye B.,Konstantopoulos S.,Hedges L.How large are teacher effects?.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2004;26:237-257.
46. Odom S. L.,Brantlinger E.,Gersten R.,Horner R. H.,Thompson B.,Harris K. R.Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices.Exceptional Children. 2005;71:137-148.
47. Pianta R.,Walsh D.High-risk children in schools: Constructing sustaining relationships. New York, NY: Routledge; 1996:.
48. Sanders W.,Rivers J.Cumulative and residual effect of teaching on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center; 1996:.
49. Schneider B.,Carnoy M.,Kilpatrick J.,Schmidt W. H.,Shavelson R. J.Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs. Washington, DC: American Education Research Association; 2007:.
50. Legal issues in school health services: A resource for school administrators, school attorneys, school nurses. Schwab N.Gelfman M., ed. North Branch, MN: Sunrise River Press; 2005:.
51. Smith S.Inquiries in literacy theory and practice. Kinzer C.Hinchman K.Leu D., ed. Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference; 1997:250-264.
52. Spira E. G.,Bracken S. S.,Fischel J. E.Predicting improvement after first-grade reading difficulties: The effects of oral language, emergent literacy, and behavior skills.Developmental Psychology. 2005;41:225-234.
53. Tauber R. T.Classroom management: Sound theory and effective practice. Portsmouth, NH: Greenwood Publishing Group; 2007:.
54. Digest of education statistics, 2011. Washington, DC: Author; 2012:.
55. Waddell G. R.Labor-market consequences of poor attitude and low self-esteem in youth.Economic Inquiry. 2006;44 (1): 69-97.
56. Wenglinsky H.The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance.Education Policy Analysis Archives. 2002;10:.
57. Williams L. J.,Downing J. E.Membership and belonging in inclusive classrooms: What do middle school students have to say?.Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps. 1998;23:98-110.
58. Winters M. A.,Greene J. P.Debunking a special education myth.Education Next. 2007;7 (2): 67-71.