Words that fascinate the listener: Predicting affective ratings of on-line lectures

International Journal of Distance Education Technologies

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 110-123

  Weninger, Felix ^a   Staudt, Pascal ^a   Schuller, Björn ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Emotion Recognition; Linguistic Features; Online Lectures; Technology Entertainment and Design Talks (TEDTalks); Text Classification

Indexed keywords

EMOTION RECOGNITION; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; ONLINE LECTURES; TECHNOLOGY-ENTERTAINMENT AND DESIGN TALKS (TEDTALKS); TEXT CLASSIFICATION;

LINGUISTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84893511693     PISSN: 15393100     EISSN: 15393119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jdet.2013040106     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Aist, G., Kort, B., Reilly, R., Mostow, J., & Picard, R. (2002). Experimentally augmenting an intelligent tutoring system with human-supplied capabilities: Adding human-provided emotional scaffolding to an automated reading tutor that listens. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI), Pittsburgh, PA: IEEE.
2. Bhatt, K., Evens, M., & Argamon, S. (2004). Hedged responses and expressions of affect in human/human and human/computer tutorial interactions. In Proceedings of Cognitive Science (pp. 114-119). Chicago, IL: CogSci.
3. Craig, S., Graesser, A., Sullins, J., & Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 241-250. doi:10.1080/ 1358165042000283101. (Pubitemid 39473944)
4. Domingos, P., & Pazzani, M. (1997). Beyond independence: Conditions for the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier. Machine Learning, 29, 103-130. doi:10.1023/A:1007413511361. (Pubitemid 127510035)
5. Forbes-Riley, K., & Litman, D. (2007). Investigating human tutor responses to student uncertainty for adaptive system development. In Proceedings of Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (pp. 678-689). Lisbon, Portugal: ACII. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2-59.
6. Forbes-Riley, K., & Litman, D. (2010). Designing and evaluating a wizarded uncertainty-adaptive spoken dialogue tutoring system. Computer Speech & Language, 25(1), 105-126. doi:10.1016/j.csl.2009.12.002.
7. Forbes-Riley, K., & Litman, D. (2011). Benefits and challenges of real-time uncertainty detection and adaptation in a spoken dialogue computer tutor. Speech Communication, 53(9-10), 1115-1136. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2011.02. 006.
8. Gabrilovich, E., & Markovitch, S. (2004). Text categorization with many redundant features: Using aggressive feature selection to make SVMs competitive with C4.5. In Proceedings of The Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (pp. 321-328). Banff, Canada: AAAI. (Pubitemid 40290824)
9. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009). The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations, 11(1), 10-18. doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278.
10. Huang, C.-C., Kuo, R., Chang, M., & Heh, J.-S. (2004). Fundamental analysis of emotion model for designing virtual learning companions. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 326-330). Joensuu, Finland: IEEE. (Pubitemid 40192230)
11. Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. In C. Nédellec & C. Rouveirol (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML) (pp. 137-142). Chemnitz, Germany: Springer. (Pubitemid 128067178)
12. Marlin, B. (2003). Modeling user rating profiles for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). Vancouver, Canada: Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation.
13. Marovic, M., Mihokovic, M., Miksa, M., Pribil, S., & Tus, A. (2011). Automatic movie ratings prediction using machine learning. [Opatija, Croatia: IEEE.]. Proceedings of MIPRO, 2011, 1640-1645.
14. McCallum, A., & Nigam, K. (1998). A comparison of event models for Naive Bayes text classification. In Proceedings of the AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization (pp. 41-48). AAAI Press.
15. Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multi-media learning. In D. L. H. Niegemann, & R. Brunken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181-195). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
16. Parent, G., & Eskenazi, M. (2011). Speaking to the crowd: Looking at past achievements in using crowdsourcing for speech and predicting future challenges. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH) (pp. 3037-3040). Florence, Italy: ISCA.
17. Platt, J. C. (1999). Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In Advances in kernel methods: Support vector learning (pp. 185-208). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Pour, P. A., Hussein, M. S., Al Zoubi, O., D'Mello, S., & Calvo, R. A. (2011). The impact of system feedback on learners' affective and physiological states. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Vol. 6094, pp. 264-273). Pittsburgh, PA: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6-31.
19. Rennie, J. D., Shih, L., Teevan, J., & Karger, D. R. (2003). Tackling the poor assumptions of naive bayes text classifiers. In Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (pp. 616-623). Washington, DC: AAAI.
20. Rosenberg, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2005). Acoustic/prosodic and lexical correlates of charismatic speech. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH) (pp. 513-516). Lisbon, Portugal: ISCA. (Pubitemid 43908112)
21. Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 24(5), 513-523. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0.
22. Schuller, B. (2011). Recognizing affect from linguistic information in 3D continuous space. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2(4), 192-205. doi:10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.17.
23. Schuller, B., Batliner, A., Steidl, S., & Seppi, D. (2011). Recognising realistic emotions and affect in speech: State of the art and lessons learnt from the first challenge. Speech Communication, 53(9/10), 1062-1087. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2011.01.011.
24. Schuller, B., & Knaup, T. (2010). Learning and knowledge-based sentiment analysis in movie review key excerpts. In A. Esposito, A. M. Esposito, R. Martone, V. Müller, & G. Scarpetta (Eds.), Toward autonomous, adaptive, and context-aware multimodal interfaces: Theoretical and practical issues (Vol. 6456, pp. 448-472). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18184-9-39.
25. Schuller, B., Valstar, M., Eyben, F., McKeown, G., Cowie, R., & Pantic, M. (2011). AVEC 2011 - The first international audio/visual emotion challenge. In Proceedings First International Audio/Visual Emotion Challenge and Workshop (AVEC 2011) (pp. 415-424). Memphis, TN: Springer.
26. Schuller, B., & Weninger, F. (2012). Ten recent trends in computational paralinguistics. In A. Esposito, A. Vinciarelli, R. Hoffmann, & V. C. Müller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th COST 2102 International Training School on Cognitive Behavioural Systems (pp. 35-49). Springer.
27. Sebastiani, F. (2002). Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(1), 1-47. doi:10.1145/505282.505283.
28. Turney, P. D. (2002). Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (pp. 417-424).
29. Vapnik, C., & Cortes, V. (1995). Support vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273-297. doi:10.1007/BF00994018.
30. Witten, I. H., & Frank, E. (2011). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
31. Wöllmer, M., Weninger, F., Steidl, S., Batliner, A., & Schuller, B. (2011). Speech-based non-prototypical affect recognition for child-robot interaction in reverberated environments. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH) (pp. 3113-3116). Florence, Italy: ISCA.
32. Yang, Y., & Liu, X. (1999). A re-examination of text categorization methods. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (p. 42-49). New York, NY: ACM.
33. Yang, Y., & Pedersen, J. O. (1997). A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (pp. 412-420). San Francisco, CA: AAAI.
34. Zhang, H. (2004). The optimality of naive Bayes. In Proceedings of the Florida AI Research Society (FLAIRS). Miami, FL: AAAI.