Learners' eye movements during construction of mechanical kinematic representations from static diagrams

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 32, Issue , 2014, Pages 51-62

  Jian, Yu Cin ^a   Wu, Chao Jung ^b   Su, Jia Han ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c HTC CORPORATION   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Continuous relation; Eye movement; Kinematic representation; Numbered arrow; Static diagram

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893479501     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ainsworth S., VanLabeke N. Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction 2004, 14:241-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.002.
2. Andrews S., Miller B., Rayner K. Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: there is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2004, 16(1/2):285-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000123.
3. Baddeley A.D. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:417-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2.
4. Bakeman R., Gottman J.M. Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis 1997, Cambridge University Press, UK. 2nd ed.
5. Boucheix J.M., Lowe R.K. An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction 2010, 20:123-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.015.
6. Cook M., Carter G., Wiebe E.N. The interpretation of cellular transport graphics by students with low and high prior knowledge. International Journal of Science Education 2008, 30:239-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690601187168.
7. Grant E.R., Spivey M.J. Eye movements and problem solving: guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science 2003, 14:462-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02454.
8. Hannus M., Hyönä J. Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1999, 24:95-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0987.
9. Hegarty M. Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 1992, 18:1084-1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.18.5.1084.
10. Hegarty M., Canham M., Fabrikant S. Thinking about the weather: how display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 2010, 36:37-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017683.
11. Hegarty M., Just M.A. Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language 1993, 32:717-742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1036.
12. Hegarty M., Kriz S., Cate C. The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction 2003, 21:325-360.
13. Hegarty M., Narayanan N.H., Freitas P. Understanding machines from multimedia and hypermedia presentations. The psychology of science text comprehension 2002, 357-384. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah, NJ. J. Otero, A.C. Graesser, J. Leon (Eds.).
14. Heiser J., Tversky B. Arrows in comprehending and producing mechanical diagrams. Cognitive Science 2006, 30:581-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_70.
15. Henderson J.M., Weeks P.A., Hollingworth A. The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:210-228.
16. Höffler T.N., Leutner D. Instructional animation versus static pictures: a meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction 2007, 17:722-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013.
17. Jian Y.C. Constructing and confirming a cognitive model of mechanical kinematic representation by recording eye movement during the reading of texts and diagrams 2012, (in Chinese). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan, Taipei.
18. Jian Y.C., Chen M.L., Ko H.W. Context effects in processing of Chinese academic words: an eye-tracking investigation. Reading Research Quarterly 2013, 48(4):403-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrq.56.
19. Jian Y.C., Wu C.J. The effect of arrows in an illustration when reading scientific text: evidence from eye movements (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Psychology 2012, 54:385-402.
20. Johnson C.I., Mayer R.E. An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2012, 18:178-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026923.
21. Kintsch W., Van Dijk T.A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 1978, 85:363-394.
22. Kriz S., Hegarty M. Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2007, 65:911-930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.06.005.
23. Kühl T., Scheiter K., Gerjets P., Edelmann J. The influence of text modality on learning with static and dynamic visualizations. Computers in Human Behavior 2011, 27:29-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.008.
24. Mason L., Pluchino P., Tornatora M.C., Ariasi N. An eye-tracking study of learning from science text with concrete and abstract illustrations. Journal of Experimental Education 2013, 81:356-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.727885.
25. Mason L., Tornatora M.C., Pluchino P. Do fourth graders integrated text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education 2013, 60:95-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011.
26. Mautone P.D., Mayer R.E. Cognitive aids for guiding graph comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 2007, 99(3):640-652. http://dx.doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.640.
27. Mayer R.E. Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology 1989, 81:240-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.240.
28. Mayer R.E. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York. http://dx.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816819.
29. Mayer R.E., Gallini J.K. When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?. Journal of Educational Psychology 1990, 82:715-726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.715.
30. Paas F., Renkl A., Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educational Psychologist 2003, 38:1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1.
31. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124(3):372-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.
32. Rayner K., Rotello C.M., Stewart A.J., Keir J., Duffy S.A. Integrating text and pictorial information: eye movements when looking at print advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2001, 7:219-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1076-898X.7.3.219.