Design and comparison of the handling performance of different electric vehicle layouts

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering

Volumn 228, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 218-232

  De Novellis, Leonardo ^a   Sorniotti, Aldo ^a   Gruber, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electric vehicles; optimisation; torque vectoring; yaw moment

Indexed keywords

AXLES; DESIGN; ELECTRIC DRIVES; ELECTRIC TOOLS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; POWERTRAINS;

ARCHITECTURAL SOLUTIONS; CONTROLLED ELECTRIC DRIVE; HANDLING CHARACTERISTICS; OPTIMISATIONS; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; TORQUE VECTORING; VEHICLE CHARACTERISTICS; YAW MOMENT;

VEHICLE PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84893477880     PISSN: 09544070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954407013506569     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Khaligh A, Li Z. Battery, ultracapacitor, fuel cell, and hybrid energy storage systems for electric, hybrid electric, fuel cell, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: state of the art. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2010 ; 59 (6). 2806-2814
2. Zeraoulia M, El Hachemi Benbouzid M, Diallo D. Electric motor drive selection issues for HEV propulsion systems: a comparative study. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2006 ; 55 (6). 1756-1764
3. Rinderknecht S, Meier T. Electric power train configurations and their transmission systems. International symposium on power electronics, electrical drives, automation and motion ; Pisa, Italy ;. 1564.
4. Hoehn BR, Stahl K, Gwinner P, Wiesbeck F. Torque-vectoring driveline for electric vehicles. FISITA world automotive congress, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ; Bejing, People's Republic of China ;. 585.
5. De Novellis L, Sorniotti A, Gruber P, et al. Torque-vectoring for electric vehicles with individually controlled motors: state-of-the-art and future developments. 26th electric vehicle symposium ; Los Angeles, California, USA ;. 2.
6. De Novellis L, Sorniotti A, Gruber P. Optimal wheel torque distribution for a four-wheel-drive fully electric vehicle.. 2013 ;:
7. Crolla DA, Cao D. The impact of hybrid and electric powertrains on vehicle dynamics, control systems and energy recuperation. Veh System Dynamics. 2012 ; 50: 95-109
8. van Zanten A, Erhardt R, Pfaff G. VDC, the vehicle dynamics control system of Bosch.. 1995 ;:
9. Goodarzi A, Alirezaie M. A new fuzzy-optimal integrated AFS/DYC control strategy. 8th international symposium on advanced vehicle control ; Taipei, Republic of China ;. 65.
10. Nagai M, Shino M, Gao F. Study on integrated control of active front steer angle and direct yaw moment. JSAE Rev. 2002 ; 23 (3). 309-315
11. Abe M. A Theoretical analysis on vehicle cornering behaviors in acceleration and in braking. Veh System Dynamics. 1986 ; 15: 1-14
12. Nagai M, Hirano Y, Yamanaka S. Integrated control of active rear wheel steering and direct yaw moment control. Veh System Dynamics. 1997 ; 27 (5-6). 357-370
13. Shimada K, Shibahata Y. Comparison of three active chassis control methods for stabilizing yaw moments.. 1994 ;:
14. van Zanten A. Bosch ESP systems: 5 years of experience.. 2000 ;:
15. Canale M. Vehicle yaw control via second-order sliding-mode technique. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2008 ; 55 (11). 3908-3916
16. Chang S, Gordon TJ. Model-based predictive control of vehicle dynamics. Int J Veh Autonomous Systems. 2007 ; 5 (1-2). 3-27
17. Koibuchi K, Yamamoto M, Fukada Y, Inagaki S. Vehicle stability control in limit cornering by active brake.. 1996 ;:
18. Hattori Y. Optimum vehicle dynamics control based on tyre driving and braking forces. R&D Toyota CRDL. 2003 ; 38 (4). 23-29
19. Graf M, Lienkamp M. Torque vectoring control design based on objective driving dynamic parameters. FISITA world automotive congress ; Bejing, People's Republic of China ;. 1787.
20. Road vehicles - vehicle dynamics and road-holding ability - vocabulary. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization ; 2011 :
21. Sawase K, Ushiroda Y, Miura T. Left-right torque-vectoring technology as the core of super all wheel control (S-AWC). Mitsubishi Motors Tech Rev. 2006 ; 18: 18-24
22. Gao L. Dynamic lithium-ion battery model for system simulation. IEEE Trans Components Packag Technol. 2002 ; 25 (3). 495-505
23. IPG Automotive. CarMaker®, http://www.ipg.de/CarMaker.609.0.html (2013, accessed 25 April 2013).
24. Amann N, Böcker J, Prenner F. Active damping of drive train oscillations for an electrically driven vehicle. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics. 2004 ; 9 (4). 697-700
25. Passenger cars - steady-state circular driving behaviour - open-loop test methods. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization ; 2012 :
26. Road vehicles - lateral transient response test methods - open-loop test methods. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization ; 2011 :
27. Milliken WF, Milliken DL Race car vehicle dynamics. Warrendale, Pennsylvania: SAE International ; 1995 :
28. Shibahata Y, Shimada K, Tomari T. Improvement of vehicle maneuverability by direct yaw moment control. Veh System Dynamics. 1993 ; 22 (5-6). 465-481
29. TanakaSKawamotoMInagakiH. Regenerative braking electric vehicle with four motors. US Patent 5148883, 1992.
30. Genta G Motor vehicle dynamics: modelling and simulation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing ; 1997 :
31. Alexander MJ, Allison JT, Papalambros PY. Decomposition-based design optimisation of electric vehicle powertrains using proper orthogonal decomposition. Int J Powertrains. 2011 ; 1 (1). 72-92
32. Coleman TF, Li Y. An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM J Optimization. 1996 ; 6 (2). 418-445
33. Sawase K, Ushiroda Y. Improvement of vehicle dynamics by right-and-left torque-vectoring system in various drivetrains. Mitsubishi Motors Tech Rev. 2007 ; 20: 14-20