SABRE: Ligand/structure-based virtual screening approach using consensus molecular-shape pattern recognition

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 338-346

  Wei, Ning Ning ^a   Hamza, Adel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING SITES; DATA FUSION; LIGANDS; MOLECULES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ACTIVE COMPOUNDS; CHEMICAL SIMILARITY; LINEAR COMBINATIONS; MOLECULAR SHAPES; RECEPTOR BINDING SITE; SHAPE BASED SIMILARITIES; STRUCTURAL DIVERSITY; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL DATABASE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRUG DATABASE; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; DRUG SCREENING; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, CHEMICAL; DATABASES, PHARMACEUTICAL; DRUG DISCOVERY; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84893381407     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci4005496     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. John, S.; Thangapandian, S.; Sakkiah, S.; Lee, K. W. Discovery of potential pancreatic cholesterol esterase inhibitors using pharmacophore modelling, virtual screening, and optimization studies J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2011, 26 (4) 535-545
2. Bi, J.; Yang, H.; Yan, H.; Song, R.; Fan, J. Knowledge-based virtual screening of HLA-A*0201-restricted CD8(+) T-cell epitope peptides from herpes simplex virus genome J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 281 (1) 133-139
3. Akula, N.; Zheng, H.; Han, F. Q.; Wang, N. Discovery of novel SecA inhibitors of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by structure based design Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21 (14) 4183-4188
4. Englebienne, P.; Moitessier, N. Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 4. Are Popular Scoring Functions Accurate for this Class of Proteins? J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49 (6) 1568-1580
5. Bleicher, K. H.; Green, L. G.; Martin, R. E.; Rogers-Evans, M. Ligand identification for G-protein-coupled receptors: a lead generation perspective Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8 (3) 287-296
6. Good, A. C.; Krystek, S. R.; Mason, J. S. High-throughput and virtual screening: core lead discovery technologies move towards integration Drug Discovery Today 2000, 5 (12) S61-S69
7. Patel, Y.; Gillet, V. J.; Bravi, G.; Leach, A. R. A comparison of the pharmacophore identification programs: Catalyst, DISCO and GASP J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16 (8-9) 653-681
8. Schneider, G.; Bohm, H. J. Virtual screening and fast automated docking methods Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7 (1) 64-70
9. Bissantz, C.; Folkers, G.; Rognan, D. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43 (25) 4759-4767
10. Brooijmans, N.; Kuntz, I. D. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2003, 32, 335-373
11. Kitchen, D. B.; Decornez, H.; Furr, J. R.; Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2004, 3 (11) 935-949
12. Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18 (2) 178-184
13. Cheng, T.; Li, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, Y.; Bryant, S. H. Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Drug Discovery: a Problem-Centric Review Aaps J. 2012, 14 (1) 133-141
14. Scior, T.; Bender, A.; Tresadern, G.; Medina-Franco, J. L.; Martinez-Mayorga, K.; Langer, T.; Cuanalo-Contreras, K.; Agrafiotis, D. K. Recognizing Pitfalls in Virtual Screening: A Critical Review J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52 (4) 867-881
15. Lee, H. S.; Choi, J.; Kufareva, I.; Abagyan, R.; Filikov, A.; Yang, Y.; Yoon, S. Optimization of high throughput virtual screening by combining shape-matching and docking methods J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48 (3) 489-497
16. Schierz, A. C. Virtual screening of bioassay data J. Cheminf. 2009, 1 21
17. Seal, A.; Passi, A.; Jaleel, U. C. A.; Wild, D. J. In-silico predictive mutagenicity model generation using supervised learning approaches J. Cheminf. 2012, 4 10
18. Willett, P. Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints Drug Discovery Today 2006, 11 (23-24) 1046-1053
19. Maggiora, G. M.; Shanmugasundaram, V. Molecular Similarity Measures. In Chemoinformatics and Computational Chemical Biology; Bajorath, J., Ed.; Springer, 2011; Vol. 672, pp 39-100.
20. Rouvray, D. H. Predicting Chemistry from Topology Sci. Am. 1986, 255 (3) 40
21. Randic, M. Characterization of Molecular Branching J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97 (23) 6609-6615
22. Randic, M. Nonempirical Approach to Structure Activity Studies Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1984, 137-153
23. Vasilescu, D.; Viani, R. Molecular Similarity in Aminothiol Radioprotectors-a Randic Graph Approach Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1987, 149-165
24. Durrant, J. D.; Friedman, A. J.; McCammon, J. A. CrystalDock: A Novel Approach to Fragment-Based Drug Design J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51 (10) 2573-2580
25. Sastry, G. M.; Dixon, S. L.; Sherman, W. Rapid Shape-Based Ligand Alignment and Virtual Screening Method Based on Atom/Feature-Pair Similarities and Volume Overlap Scoring J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51 (10) 2455-2466
26. Zhang, Q.; Muegge, I. Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: Ranking, voting, and consensus scoring J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (5) 1536-1548
27. Kinnings, S. L.; Jackson, R. M. LigMatch: A Multiple Structure-Based Ligand Matching Method for 3D Virtual Screening J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49 (9) 2056-2066
28. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2 (22) 3256-3266
29. Kirchmair, J.; Distinto, S.; Markt, P.; Schuster, D.; Spitzer, G. M.; Liedl, K. R.; Wolber, G. How To Optimize Shape-Based Virtual Screening: Choosing the Right Query and Including Chemical Information J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49 (3) 678-692
30. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: Use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (2) 462-470
31. Venkatraman, V.; Perez-Nueno, V. I.; Mavridis, L.; Ritchie, D. W. Comprehensive Comparison of Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Tools Against the DUD Data set Reveals Limitations of Current 3D Methods J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50 (12) 2079-2093
32. Giganti, D.; Guillemain, H.; Spadoni, J.-L.; Nilges, M.; Zagury, J.-F.; Montes, M. Comparative Evaluation of 3D Virtual Ligand Screening Methods: Impact of the Molecular Alignment on Enrichment J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50 (6) 992-1004
33. Hamza, A.; Wei, N. N.; Zhan, C. G. Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Approach Using a New Scoring Function J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52 (4) 963-974
34. Hamza, A.; Wei, N.-N.; Hao, C.; Xiu, Z.; Zhan, C.-G. A novel and efficient ligand-based virtual screening approach using the HWZ scoring function and an enhanced shape-density model J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2012, 1-15
35. Zhou, M.; Hamza, A.; Zhan, C.-G.; Thorson, J. S. Assessing the Regioselectivity of OleD-Catalyzed Glycosylation with a Diverse Set of Acceptors J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76 (2) 279-286
36. Zhang, W.; Sviripa, V.; Chen, X.; Shi, J.; Yu, T.; Hamza, A.; Ward, N. D.; Kril, L. M.; Vander Kooi, C. W.; Zhan, C.-G.; Evers, B. M.; Watt, D. S.; Liu, C. Fluorinated N,N-Dialkylaminostilbenes Repress Colon Cancer by Targeting Methionine S-Adenosyltransferase 2A ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 796-803
37. Stambouli, N.; Dridi, M.; Wei, N.-N.; Jlizi, A.; Bouraoui, A.; Elgaaied, A. B. A. Structural insight into the binding complex: β-arrestin/CCR5 complex J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2013, 1-10
38. Zhou, M.; Hou, Y.; Hamza, A.; Zhan, C.-G.; Bugni, T. S.; Thorson, J. S. Probing the Regiospecificity of Enzyme-Catalyzed Steroid Glycosylation Org. Lett. 2012, 14 (21) 5424-5427
39. Nejla, S.; Ning-Ning, W.; Asma, J.; Samah, A.; Rim, A.; Baderredine, K.; Amine, S.; Hanen, T. B. A.; Mahdi, D.; Hamza, A.; Amel, B. A. E. Structural insight into a novel human CCR5-V130I variant associated with resistance to HIV-1 infection J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2013, 1-9
40. Jahn, A.; Hinselmann, G.; Nikolas Fechner, N.; Zell, A. Optimal assignment methods for ligand-based virtual screening J. Cheminf. 2009, 1 (14) 1-23
41. Grant, J. A.; Pickup, B. T. A Gaussian Description of Molecular Shape J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99 (11) 3503-3510
42. Grant, J. A.; Gallardo, M. A.; Pickup, B. T. A fast method of molecular shape comparison: A simple application of a Gaussian description of molecular shape J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17 (14) 1653-1666
43. Mezey, P. G. Topological Shape-Analysis of Chain Molecules-An Application of the GSTE Principle J. Math. Chem. 1993, 12 (1-4) 365-373
44. Walker, P. D.; Arteca, G. A.; Mezey, P. G. A Complete Shape Characterization for Molecular Charge-Densities Represented by Gaussian-Type Functions J. Comput. Chem. 1991, 12 (2) 220-230
45. Grant, J. A.; Pickup, B. T. A gaussian description of molecular shape (vol 99, pg 3505, 1995) J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100 (6) 2456-2456
46. Korhonen, S. P.; Tuppurainen, K.; Laatikainen, R.; Perakyla, M. FLUFF-BALL, a template-based grid-independent superposition and QSAR technique: Validation using a benchmark steroid data set J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43 (6) 1780-1793
47. Labute, P.; Williams, C.; Feher, M.; Sourial, E.; Schmidt, J. M. Flexible alignment of small molecules J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44 (10) 1483-1490
48. Lemmen, C.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. FLEXS: A method for fast flexible ligand superposition J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41 (23) 4502-4520
49. Yan, X.; Li, J.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, M.; Ge, H.; Xu, J. Enhancing Molecular Shape Comparison by Weighted Gaussian Functions J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53 (8) 1967-1978
50. McGann, M. R.; Almond, H. R.; Nicholls, A.; Grant, J. A.; Brown, F. K. Gaussian docking functions Biopolymers 2003, 68 (1) 76-90
51. Nissink, J. W. M.; Murray, C.; Hartshorn, M.; Verdonk, M. L.; Cole, J. C.; Taylor, R. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction Proteins-Structure Function Genetics 2002, 49 (4) 457-471
52. Hartshorn, M. J.; Verdonk, M. L.; Chessari, G.; Brewerton, S. C.; Mooij, W. T. M.; Mortenson, P. N.; Murray, C. W. Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50 (4) 726-741
53. Huang, N.; Shoichet, B. K.; Irwin, J. J. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (23) 6789-6801
54. Cross, J. B.; Thompson, D. C.; Rai, B. K.; Baber, J. C.; Fan, K. Y.; Hu, Y.; Humblet, C. Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49 (6) 1455-1474
55. Cross, J. B.; Thompson, D. C.; Rai, B. K.; Baber, J. C.; Fan, K. Y.; Hu, Y. B.; Humblet, C. Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49 (6) 1455-1474
56. Good, A. C.; Oprea, T. I. Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection? J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22 (3-4) 169-178
57. Cheeseright, T. J.; Mackey, M. D.; Melville, J. L.; Vinter, J. G. FieldScreen: Virtual Screening Using Molecular Fields. Application to the DUD Data Set J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48 (11) 2108-2117
58. Kalliokoski, T.; Salo, H. S.; Lahtela-Kakkonen, M.; Poso, A. The Effect of Ligand-Based Tautomer and Protomer Prediction on Structure-Based Virtual Screening J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49 (12) 2742-2748
59. Svensson, F.; Karlen, A.; Skold, C. Virtual Screening Data Fusion Using Both Structure- and Ligand-Based Methods J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52 (1) 225-232
60. Jacobsson, M.; Liden, P.; Stjernschantz, E.; Bostrom, H.; Norinder, U. Improving structure-based virtual screening by multivariate analysis of scoring data J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46 (26) 5781-5789
61. Hecker, E. A.; Duraiswami, C.; Andrea, T. A.; Diller, D. J. Use of catalyst pharmacophore models for screening of large combinatorial libraries J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42 (5) 1204-1211
62. Diller, D. J.; Li, R. X. Kinases, homology models, and high throughput docking J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46 (22) 4638-4647
63. Triballeau, N.; Acher, F.; Brabet, I.; Pin, J. P.; Bertrand, H. O. Virtual screening workflow development guided by the "receiver operating characteristic" curve approach. Application to high-throughput docking on metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4 J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48 (7) 2534-2547
64. Vainio, M. J.; Puranen, J. S.; Johnson, M. S. ShaEP: Molecular Overlay Based on Shape and Electrostatic Potential J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49 (2) 492-502