FLEXS: A method for fast flexible ligand superposition

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 41, Issue 23, 1998, Pages 4502-4520

  Lemmen, Christian ^a   Lengauer, Thomas ^a   Klebe, Gerhard ^b  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FIT   (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGATROBAN; CONCANAVALIN A; DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE; ENDOTHIAPEPSIN; FIBRINOGEN RECEPTOR; GLYCOGEN PHOSPHORYLASE; STREPTAVIDIN; TRYPSIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; COMPLEX FORMATION; DRUG RECEPTOR BINDING; HYDROPHOBICITY; LIGAND BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SCREENING; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THROMBOCYTE AGGREGATION;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0032488013     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm981037l     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. Predicting receptor-ligand interactions by an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261, 470-489.
2. Welch, W.; Ruppert, J.; Jain, A. N. Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 449-462.
3. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
4. Kearsley, S. K.; Smith, G. M. An alternative method for the alignment of molecular structures: Maximizing electrostatic and steric overlap. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 1990, 3, 615-633.
5. Grant, J. A.; Gallardo, M. A.; Pickup, B. T. A fast method of molecular shape comparison: A simple application of a Gaussian description of molecular shape. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 1653-1666.
6. Parretti, M. F.; Kroemer, R. T.; Rothman, J. H.; Richards, W. G. Alignment of molecules by the Monte Carlo optimization of molecular similarity indices. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1344-1353.
7. Klebe, G.; Mietzner, T.; Weber, F. Different approaches toward an automatic structural alignment of drug molecules: Application to sterol mimics, thrombin and thermolysin inhibitors. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 751-778.
8. Perkins, T. D. J.; Mills, J. E. J.; Dean, P. M. Molecular surfacevolume and property matching to superpose flexible dissimilar molecules. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1995, 5, 479-490.
9. Mestres, J.; Rohrer, D. C.; Maggiora, G. M. MIMIC: A molecularfield matching program. Exploiting applicability of molecular similarity approaches. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 934-954.
10. Marshall, G. R.; Barry, C. D.; Bosshard, H. D.; Dammkoehler, R. D.; Dunn, D. A. The conformational parameter in drug design: The active analogue approach. In Computer-Assisted Drug Design; Olson, E. C., Christoffersen, R. E., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979; Vol. 112, pp 205-222.
11. Gerber, P. R.; Müller, K. Superimposing several sets of atomic coordinates. Acta Crystallogr. 1987, A43, 426-428.
12. McMartin, C.; Bohacek, R. S. Flexible matching of test ligands to a 3D pharmacophore using a molecular superposition force field: Comparison of predicted and experimental conformations of inhibitors of three enzymes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1995, 9, 237-250.
13. Martin, Y. C.; Bures, M. G.; Danaher, E. A.; DeLazzer, J.; Lico, I.; Pavlik, P. A. A fast new approach to pharmacophore mapping and its application to dopaminergic and benzodiazepine agonists. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1992, 7, 83-102.
14. Kato, Y.; Inoue, A.; Yamada, M.; Tomioka, N.; Itai, A. Automatic superposition of drug molecules based on their common receptor site. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1992, 6, 475-486.
15. Hurst, T. Flexible 3D searching: The directed tweak technique. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 190-196.
16. Thorner, D. A.; Wild, D. J.; Willett, P.; Wright, P. M. Similarity searching in files of three-dimensional chemical structures: Flexible field-based searching of molecular electrostatic potentials. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 900-908.
17. Hahn, M. Three-dimensional shape-based searching of conformationally flexible compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 80-86.
18. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R.C. A genetic algorithm for flexible molecular overlay and pharmacophore elucidation. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1995, 9, 532-549.
19. Klebe, G. Structural alignment of molecules. In 3D QSAR in Drug Design. Theory, Methods and Applications; Kubinyi, H., Ed.; ESCOM Science Publishers: Leiden, The Netherlands, 1993; pp 173-199.
20. Bures, M. G. Recent techniques and applications in pharmacophore mapping. In Practical application of computer-aided drug design; Charifson, P. S., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1997; pp 39-72.
21. Leach, A. R.; Kuntz, I. D. Conformational analysis of flexible ligands in macromolecular receptor sites. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 730-748.
22. Moon, J. B.; Howe, W. J. Computer design of bioactive molecules: A method for receptor-based de novo ligand design. Proteins 1991, 11, 314-328.
23. Böhm, H.-J. The computer program LUDI: A new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1992, 6, 61-78.
24. Rotstein, S. H.; Murcko, M. A. GenStar: A method for de novo drug design. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1993, 7, 23-43.
25. Lemmen, C.; Lengauer, T. Time-efficient flexible superposition of medium-sized molecules. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 357-368.
26. Lemmen, C.; Hiller, C.; Lengauer, T. RigFit: A new approach to superimpose ligand molecules. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 491-502.
27. Zien, A.; Lemmen, C.; Lengauer, T. Optimization methods for the calibration of empirical scoring functions. SIAM J. Optimiz. 1998, submitted.
28. Klebe, G.; Mietzner, T. A fast and efficient method to generate biologically relevant conformations. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 583-606.
29. Hoflack, J.; De Clercq, P. J. The SCA program: An easy way for the conformational evaluation of polycyclic molecules. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 6667.
30. Gasteiger, J.; Rudolph, C.; Sadowski, J. Automatic generation of 3d-atomic coordinates for organic molecules. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 1990, 3, 537-547.
31. Klebe, G. The use of composite crystal-field enviroments in molecular recognition and the de-novo design of protein ligands. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 237, 221-235.
32. Viswanadhan, V. N.; Ghose, A. K.; Revankar, G. R.; Robins, R. K. Atomic physicochemical parameters for three-dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 4. additional parameters for hydrophobic and dispersive interactions and their application for an automated superposition of certain naturally occurring nucleoside antibiotics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 163-172.
33. Böhm, H.-J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 243-256.
34. Bennett, K. P.; Mangasarian, O. L. Robust Linear Programming Discrimination of Two Linearly Inseparable Sets. Optimiz. Methods Software 1992, 1, 23-34.
35. Zien, A. Optimierungsmethoden zur Kalibrierung empirischer Bewertungsfunktionen. Master's thesis, University of Bonn, 1997.
36. Linnainmaa, S.; Harwood, D.; Davis, L. S. Pose determination of a three-dimensional object using triangle pairs. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 1988, 10, 634-646.
37. Rarey, M.; Wefing, S.; Lengauer, T. Placement of medium-sized molecular fragments into active sites of proteins. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 41-54.
38. Fischer, D.; Lin, S. L.; Wolfson, H. L.; Nussinov, R. A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 248, 459-477.
39. Lenhof, H.-P. An algorithm for the protein docking problem. In Bioinformatics: From Nucliec Acids and Proteins to Cell Metabolism; Schomburg, D., Lessel, U., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1995; Vol. 18, pp 125-139.
40. Nissink, J. W. M.; Verdonk, M. L.; Kroon, J.; Mietzner, T.; Klebe, G. Superposition of molecules: Electron density fitting using Fourier transforms. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 638-645.
41. Hodgkin, E. E.; Richards, G. Quantum biologiy symposium 14. Int. J. Quantum Chem., Quantum Biol. Symp. 1987, 149 105-110.
42. Rossmann, M. G.; Blow, D. M. The detection of subunits within the crystallographic asymmetric unit. Acta Crystallogr. 1962, 15, 24-31.
43. Dennis, J. E.; Schnabel, R. B. Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations; Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 1983.
44. Hiller, C. Optimierungsmethoden zum strukturellen Alignment von Ligandmolekülen. Master's Thesis, University of Bonn, 1997.
45. Dixon, J. S. Evaluation of the CASP2 docking section. Proteins 1997, Suppl. 1, 198-204.
46. Mattos, C.; Rasmussen, B.; Ding, X.; Petsko, G. A.; Ringe, D. Analogous inhibitors of elastase do not always bind analogously. Nature Struct. Biol. 1994, 1, 55-58.
47. Böhm, H.-J.; Klebe, G. What can we learn from molecular recognition in protein-ligand complexes for the design of new drugs? Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2588-2614.
48. Mattos, C.; Ringe, D. Multiple binding modes. In 3D QSAR in Drug Design. Theory, Methods and Applications; Kubinyi, H., Ed.; ESCOM Science Publishers: Leiden, The Netherlands, 1993; pp 226-254.
49. Kopple, K. D.; Baures, P. W.; Bean, J. W.; D'Ambrosio, C. A.; Huges, J. L.; Peishoff, C. E.; Eggleston, D. S. Conformation of Arg-Gly-Asp containing heterodetic cyclic peptides: Solution and crystal studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 9615-9623.
50. Briem, H.; Kuntz, I. D. Molecular similarity based on DOCK-generated fingerprints. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 3401-3408.
51. MACCS Drug Data Report (MDDR); MDL Information Systems Inc., San Leandro, CA.
52. SYBYL Molecular Modeling Software Version 6.x; TRIPOS Associates. Inc., St. Louis, MO; 1994.
53. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity - a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3219-3228.
54. DAYLIGHT Software Manual; DAYLIGHT Inc., Mission Viejo, CA; 1994.