Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints

Drug Discovery Today

Volumn 11, Issue 23-24, 2006, Pages 1046-1053

  Willett, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOTENSIN 2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; BENZODIAZEPINE RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; BETA LACTAMASE INHIBITOR; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; DOPAMINE 2 RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DOPAMINE RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; PROSTAGLANDIN SYNTHASE INHIBITOR; PROTEIN KINASE C INHIBITOR; PROTEINASE INHIBITOR; SEROTONIN 1A AGONIST; SEROTONIN 3 ANTAGONIST; SEROTONIN 4 AGONIST; SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITOR; SUBSTANCE P ANTAGONIST; THROMBIN INHIBITOR;

CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA BASE; DRUG SCREENING; MEASUREMENT; MOLECULAR SIZE; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG DESIGN; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33751246188     PISSN: 13596446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.10.005     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Stahura F.L., and Bajorath J. Virtual screening methods that complement high-throughput screening. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 7 (2004) 259-269
2. Walters W.P., et al. Virtual screening - an overview. Drug Discov. Today 3 (1998) 160-178
3. In: Böhm H.-J., and Schneider G. (Eds). Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules (2000), Wiley-VCH
4. In: Klebe G. (Ed). Virtual Screening: an Alternative or Complement to High Throughput Screening (2000), Kluwer
5. In: Johnson M.A., and Maggiora G.M. (Eds). Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity (1990), John Wiley
6. Carhart R.E., et al. Atom pairs as molecular-features in structure activity studies - definition and applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 25 (1985) 64-73
7. Willett P., et al. Implementation of nearest-neighbour searching in an online chemical structure search system. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 26 (1986) 36-41
8. Leach A.R., and Gillet V.J. An Introduction to Chemoinformatics (2003), Kluwer
9. In: Gasteiger J., and Engel T. (Eds). Chemoinformatics: A Textbook (2003), Wiley-VCH
10. Willett P., and Winterman V. A comparison of some measures of inter-molecular structural similarity. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships 5 (1986) 18-25
11. Brown R.D., and Martin Y.C. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36 (1996) 572-584
12. Brown R.D., and Martin Y.C. The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptors relevant to ligand-receptor binding. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37 (1997) 1-9
13. Martin Y.C., et al. Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activities?. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2002) 4350-4358
14. Chen X., and Reynolds C.H. Performance of similarity measures in 2D fragment-based similarity searching: comparison of structural descriptors and similarity coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42 (2002) 1407-1414
15. Sheridan R.P., et al. Similarity to molecules in the training set is a good discriminator for prediction accuracy in QSAR. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 (2004) 1912-1928
16. Shanmugasundaram V., et al. Hit-directed nearest-neighbor searching. J. Med. Chem. 48 (2005) 240-248
17. He L., and Jurs P.C. Assessing the reliability of a QSAR model's predictions. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 23 (2005) 503-523
18. Zhang Q., and Muegge I. Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and consensus scoring. J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006) 1536-1548
19. In: Dean P.M. (Ed). Molecular Similarity in Drug Design (1994), Chapman and Hall
20. Willett P., et al. Chemical similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38 (1998) 983-996
21. Nikolova N., and Jaworska J. Approaches to measure chemical similarity - a review. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships and Combinatorial Science 22 (2003) 1006-1026
22. Bender A., and Glen R.C. Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2 (2004) 3204-3218
23. Matter H. Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 40 (1997) 1219-1229
24. Schuffenhauer A., et al. Similarity searching in files of three-dimensional chemical structures: Analysis of the BIOSTER database using two-dimensional fingerprints and molecular field descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 (2000) 295-307
25. Makara G.M. Measuring molecular similarity and diversity: total pharmacophore diversity. J. Med. Chem. 44 (2001) 3563-3571
26. Sheridan R.P., and Kearsley S.K. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods?. Drug Discov. Today 7 (2002) 903-911
27. Cruciani G., et al. Suitability of molecular descriptors for database mining. A comparative analysis. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2002) 2685-2694
28. Jenkins J.L., et al. A 3D similarity method for scaffold hopping from known drugs or natural ligands to new chemotypes. J. Med. Chem. 47 (2004) 6144-6159
29. Cramer R.D., et al. "Lead hopping". Validation of topomer similarity as a superior predictor of similar biological activities. J. Med. Chem. 47 (2004) 6777-6791
30. Willett P. Similarity and Clustering in Chemical Information Systems (1987), Research Studies Press
31. In: Dean P.M., and Lewis R.A. (Eds). Molecular Diversity in Drug Design (1999), Kluwer
32. In: Ghose A.K., and Viswanadhan V.N. (Eds). Combinatorial Library Design and Evaluation: Principles, Software Tools and Applications in Drug Discovery (2001), Marcel Dekker
33. Downs G.M., and Barnard J.M. Clustering methods and their uses in computational chemistry. Reviews in Computational Chemistry 18 (2002) 1-40
34. Gillet, V.J. and Willett, P. (2006 in press) Compound selection using measures of similarity and dissimilarity. In Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry, Elsevier, 2006
35. Stahura F.L., and Bajorath J. Biol- and chemo-informatics beyond data management: crucial challenges and future opportunities. Drug Discov. Today 7 (2002) S41-S47
36. Bajorath J. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1 (2002) 882-894
37. Godden J.W., et al. Combinatorial preferences affect molecular similarity/diversity calculations using binary fingerprints and Tanimoto coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 (2000) 163-166
38. Xue L., et al. Fingerprint scaling increases the probability of identifying molecules with similar activity in virtual screening calculations. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41 (2001) 746-753
39. Godden J.W., et al. Anatomy of fingerprint search calculations on structurally diverse sets of active compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45 (2006) 1812-1819
40. Kearsley S.K., et al. Chemical similarity using physiochemical property descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36 (1996) 118-127
41. Sheridan R.P., et al. Chemical similarity using geometric atom pair descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36 (1996) 128-136
42. Sheridan R.P. The centroid approximation for mixtures: calculating similarity and deriving structure-activity relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 (2000) 1456-1469
43. Sheridan R.P. The most common chemical replacements in drug-like compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42 (2002) 103-108
44. Holliday J.D., et al. Grouping of coefficients for the calculation of inter-molecular similarity and dissimilarity using 2D fragment bit-strings. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 5 (2002) 155-166
45. Holliday J.D., et al. Analysis and display of the size dependence of chemical similarity coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 (2003) 819-828
46. Salim N., et al. Combination of fingerprint-based similarity coefficients using data fusion. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 (2003) 435-442
47. Hert J., et al. Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2 (2004) 3256-3266
48. Whittle M., et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of virtual screening by fusing nearest neighbor lists: A comparison of similarity coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 (2004) 1840-1848
49. Hert J., et al. Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 (2004) 1177-1185
50. Hert J., et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of similarity-based virtual screening using nearest-neighbour information. J. Med. Chem. 48 (2005) 7049-7054
51. Hert J., et al. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data-fusion and machine-learning techniques to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 46 (2006) 462-470
52. Flower D.R. On the properties of bit string based measures of chemical similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38 (1988) 379-386
53. Lajiness M. Molecular similarity-based methods for selecting compounds for screening. In: Rouvray D. (Ed). Computational Chemical Graph Theory (1990), Nova Science Publishers 299-316
54. Dixon S.L., and Koehler R.T. The hidden component of size in two-dimensional fragment descriptors: side effects on sampling in bioactive libraries. J. Med. Chem. 42 (1999) 2887-2900
55. Fligner M.A., et al. A modification of the Jaccard-Tanimoto similarity index for diverse selection of chemical compounds using binary strings. Technometrics 44 (2002) 110-119
56. Hubálek Z. Coefficients of association and similarity, based on binary (presence-absence) data: an evaluation. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 57 (1982) 669-689
57. Gower J.C., and Legendre P. Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. J. Classf. 5 (1986) 5-48
58. Everitt B.S., et al. Cluster Analysis (2001), Edward Arnold
59. Hall D.L. Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion (1992), Artech House
60. Klein L.A. Sensor and Data Fusion Concepts and Applications (1999), SPIE Optical Engineering Press
61. Belkin N.J., et al. Combining the evidence of multiple query representations for information retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 31 (1995) 431-448
62. Hsu D.F., and Taksa I. Comparing rank and score combination methods for data fusion in information retrieval. Information Retrieval 8 (2005) 449-480
63. Charifson P.S., et al. Consensus scoring: a method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J. Med. Chem. 42 (1999) 5100-5109
64. Clark R.D., et al. Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20 (2002) 281-295
65. Ginn C.M.R., et al. Combination of molecular similarity measures using data fusion. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 20 (2000) 1-16
66. Wang R., and Wang S. How does consensus scoring work for virtual library screening? An idealized computer experiment. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41 (2001) 1422-1426
67. Ginn C.M.R., et al. Similarity searching in files of three-dimensional chemical structures: evaluation of the EVA descriptor and combination of rankings using data fusion. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 37 (1997) 23-37
68. Schuffenhauer A., et al. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 (2003) 391-405
69. Patel Y., et al. A comparison of the pharmacophore identification programs: Catalyst, DISCO and GASP. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 16 (2002) 653-681
70. Warr W.A., and Willett P. The principles and practice of 3D database searching. In: Martin Y.C., and Willett P. (Eds). Designing Bioactive Molecules: Three-Dimensional Techniques and Applications (1997), American Chemical Society 73-95
71. Cramer R.D., et al. Substructural analysis. A novel approach to the problem of drug design. J. Med. Chem. 17 (1974) 533-535
72. Chen X., et al. Recursive partitioning analysis of a large structure-activity data set using three-dimensional descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38 (1998) 1054-1062
73. Harper G., et al. Prediction of biological activity for high-throughput screening using binary kernel discrimination. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41 (2001) 1295-1300
74. Kubinyi H. Success stories of computer-aided design. In: Ekins S. (Ed). Computer Applications in Pharmaceutical Research and Development (2006), Wiley-Interscience 377-424