Calculation of crystalline lens power in chickens with a customized version of Bennett's equation

Vision Research

Volumn 96, Issue , 2014, Pages 33-38

  Iribarren, Rafael ^a   Rozema, Jos J ^b,c   Schaeffel, Frank ^d   Morgan, Ian G ^e  

^a San Luis Medical Center   (Argentina)

^b ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^e AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bennett; Chickens; Emmetropization; Lens power

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER DEPTH; ANTERIOR LENS RADIUS; ARTICLE; BENNETT EQUATION; BIOMETRY; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEAL RADIUS; EYE AXIS LENGTH; EYE REFRACTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KERATOMETRY; LENS; LENS SIZE; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; NONHUMAN; POSTERIOR LENS RADIUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION INDEX; SURFACE PROPERTY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; AGING; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; CHICKEN; CORNEA; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REFRACTOMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

AGING; ANIMALS; ANTERIOR CHAMBER; AXIAL LENGTH, EYE; CHICKENS; CORNEA; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTOMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84893363970     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Augusteyn R.C. On the growth and internal structure of the human lens. Experimental Eye Research 2010, 90:643-654.
2. Avila N.V., McFadden S.A. A detailed paraxial schematic eye for the White Leghorn chick. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 2010, 196:825-840.
3. Bassnett S. Lens organelle degradation. Experimental Eye Research 2002, 74:1-6.
4. Bennett A.G. A method of determining the equivalent powers of the eye and its crystalline lens without resort to phakometry. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 1988, 8:53-59.
5. Borja D., Manns F., Ho A., Ziebarth N., Rosen A.M., Jain R., et al. Optical power of the isolated human crystalline lens. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2008, 49:2541-2548.
6. Brown N.A. Dating the onset of cataract. Transactions of the Ophthalmological Societies of the United Kingdom 1976, 96:18-23.
7. Brown N.A., Sparrow J.M., Bron A.J. Central compaction in the process of lens growth as indicated by lamellar cataract. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1988, 72:538-544.
8. Choh V., Sivak J.G. Lenticular accommodation in relation to ametropia: The chick model. Journal of Vision 2005, 5:165-176.
9. Choh V., Sivak J.G., Meriney S.D. A physiological model to measure effects of age on lenticular accommodation and spherical aberration in chickens. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2002, 43:92-98.
10. Cohen Y., Belkin M., Yehezkel O., Solomon A.S., Polat U. Dependency between light intensity and refractive development under light-dark cycles. Experimental Eye Research 2011, 92:40-46.
11. Dunne M.C., Barnes D.A., Royston J.M. An evaluation of Bennett's method for determining the equivalent powers of the eye and its crystalline lens without resort to phakometry. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 1989, 9:69-71.
12. Gordon R.A., Donzis P.B. Refractive development of the human eye. Archives of Ophthalmology 1985, 103:785-789.
13. Gottlieb M.D., Fugate-Wentzek L.A., Wallman J. Different visual deprivations produce different ametropias and different eye shapes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1987, 28:1225-1235.
14. Howlett M.H., McFadden S.A. Emmetropization and schematic eye models in developing pigmented guinea pigs. Vision Research 2007, 47:1178-1190.
15. Iribarren R., Fuentes Bonthoux F., Pfortner T., Chiaradia P., Stell W.K. Corneal power is correlated with anterior chamber diameter. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2012, 53:3788-3791.
16. Irving E.L., Sivak J.G., Curry T.A., Callender M.G. Chick eye optics: Zero to fourteen days. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 1996, 179:185-194.
17. Kasthurirangan S., Markwell E.L., Atchison D.A., Pope J.M. In vivo study of changes in refractive index distribution in the human crystalline lens with age and accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008, 49:2531-2540.
18. Kisilak M.L., Campbell M.C., Hunter J.J., Irving E.L., Huang L. Aberrations of chick eyes during normal growth and lens induction of myopia. Journal of Comparative Physiology A - Neuroethology, Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology 2006, 192:845-855.
19. Li T., Troilo D., Glasser A., Howland H.C. Constant light produces severe corneal flattening and hyperopia in chickens. Vision Research 1995, 35:1203-1209.
20. Littmann H. Fundamental considerations about ophthalmology. Graefes Archives of Ophthalmology 1951, 151:251.
21. Lovicu F.J., McAvoy J.W. The age of rats affects the response of lens epithelial explants to fibroblast growth factor. An ultrastructural analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1992, 33:2269-2278.
22. Mutti D.O., Mitchell G.L., Jones L.A., Friedman N.E., Frane S.L., Lin W.K., et al. Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during emmetropization in infants. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2005, 46:3074-3080.
23. Napper G.A., Brennan N.A., Barrington M., Squires M.A., Vessey G.A., Vingrys A.J. The duration of normal visual exposure necessary to prevent form deprivation myopia in chicks. Vision Research 1995, 35:1337-1344.
24. Peetermans J.A., Foy B.D., Tanaka T. Accumulation and diffusion of crystalline inside single fiber cells in intact chicken embryo lenses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1987, 84:1727-1730.
25. Penha A.M., Burkhardt E., Schaeffel F., Feldkaemper M.P. Ultrasonography and optical low-coherence interferometry compared in the chicken eye. Optometry and Vision Science 2012, 89:916-921.
26. Qiao-Grider Y., Hung L.F., Kee C.S., Ramamirtham R., Smith E.L. Normal ocular development in young rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Vision Research 2007, 47:1424-1444.
27. Rozema J.J., Atchison D.A., Kasthurirangan S., Pope J.M., Tassignon M.J. Methods to estimate the size and shape of the unaccommodated crystalline lens in vivo. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2012, 53:2533-2540.
28. Rozema J.J., Atchison D.A., Tassignon M.J. Comparing methods to estimate the human lens power. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2011, 52:7937-7942.
29. Schaeffel F., Howland H.C. Corneal accommodation in chick and pigeon. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 1987, 160:375-384.
30. Schaeffel F., Howland H.C. Visual optics in normal and ametropic chickens. Vision Science 1988, 3:83-98.
31. Schmucker C., Schaeffel F. A paraxial schematic eye model for the growing C57BL/6 mouse. Vision Research 2004, 44:1857-1867.
32. Sivak J.G. The Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture: Optics of the crystalline lens. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 1985, 62:299-308.
33. Sivak J.G. Through the lens clearly: Phylogeny and development: The Proctor lecture. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2004, 45:740-747. 739.
34. Sivak J.G. The role of the lens in refractive development of the eye: Animal models of ametropia. Experimental Eye Research 2008, 87:3-8.
35. Sivak J.G., Ryall L.A., Weerheim J., Campbell M.C. Optical constancy of the chick lens during pre- and post-hatching ocular development. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1989, 30:967-974.
36. Troilo D., Li T., Glasser A., Howland H.C. Differences in eye growth and the response to visual deprivation in different strains of chicken. Vision Research 1995, 35:1211-1216.
37. Wallman J., Adams J.I. Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: Susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization. Vision Research 1987, 27:1139-1163.
38. Wallman J., Adams J.I., Trachtman J.N. The eyes of young chickens grow toward emmetropia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 1981, 20:557-561.
39. Wallman J., Turkel J., Trachtman J. Extreme myopia produced by modest change in early visual experience. Science 1978, 201:1249-1251.
40. Wallman J., Winawer J. Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia. Neuron 2004, 43:447-468.