The role of the lens in refractive development of the eye: Animal models of ametropia

Experimental Eye Research

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 3-8

  Sivak, Jacob G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

hyperopia; lens; myopia; refractive development; visual environment

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; CILIARY BODY; CORNEA; EYE REFRACTION; HYPERMETROPIA; LENS; MYOPIA; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; REVIEW; TILAPIA;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ANIMALS; BIRDS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EYE; FISHES; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MAMMALS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; SENSORY DEPRIVATION;

EID: 46049092567     PISSN: 00144835     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.03.001     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Andison M.E., and Sivak J.G. The naturally-occurring accommodative response of the oscar, Astronotus ocellatus, to visual stimuli. Vision Res. 36 (1996) 3021-3027
2. Andison M.E., Sivak J.G., and Bird D.M. The refractive development of the eye of the American kestrel (Falco sparverius): a new avian model. J. Comp. Physiol. [A] 170 (1992) 565-574
3. Bagnoli P., Porciatti V., and Francesconi W. Retinal and tectal responses to alternating gratings are unaffected by monocular deprivation in pigeons. Brain Res. 338 (1985) 341-345
4. Bantseev V., Oriowo O.M., Giblin F.J., Leverenz V.R., Trevithick J.R., and Sivak J.G. Effect of hyperbaric oxygen on guinea pig lens optical quality and on the refractive state of the eye. Exp. Eye Res. 78 (2004) 925-931
5. Bennett A.G., and Rabbetts R.B. Clinical Visual Optics (1984), Butterworths, London pp. 1-470
6. Choh V., and Sivak J.G. Lenticular accommodation in relation to ametropia: the chick model. J. Vis. 5 (2005) 165-176
7. Choh V., Sivak J.G., and Meriney S.D. A physiological model to measure effects of age on lenticular accommodation and spherical aberration in chickens. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43 (2002) 92-98
8. Choh V., Sivak J.G., Irving E.L., and Wong W. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the anterior segment of the enucleated chicken eye during accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 22 (2002) 401-408
9. Chow R.L., and Lang R.A. Early eye development in vertebrates. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17 (2001) 255-296
10. Coulombre J., and Coulombre A.J. Lens development: fibre elongation and lens orientation. Science 142 (1963) 1489-1490
11. Coulombre J.L., and Coulombre A.J. Lens development IV. Size, shape and orientation. Invest. Opththal. Vis. Sci. 8 (1969) 251-257
12. Curry T.A., Sivak J.G., Callender M.G., and Irving E.L. A focal magnification does not influence chick eye development. Optometry Vis. Sci. 76 (1999) 316-319
13. Donders F.C. On the Anomalies of Accommodation and Refraction of the Eye (1864), The New Sydenham Society, London p. 343
14. Easter S.S., and Hitchcock P.F. The myopic eye of the black moor goldfish. Vision Res. 26 (1986) 1831-1833
15. Feldkaemper M.P., Wang H.Y., and Schaeffel F. Changes in retinal and choroidal gene expression during development of refractive errors in chicks. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41 (2000) 1623-1628
16. Fischer D., Pavlidis M., and Thanos S. Cataractogenic lens injury prevents traumatic ganglion cell death and promotes axonal regeneration both in vivo and in culture. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41 (2000) 3943-3954
17. Griep A. Cell cycle regulation in the developing lens. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 17 (2006) 686-697
18. Greene P.R. Optical constants and dimensions for the myopic, hyperopic, and normal rhesus eye. Exp. Eye Res. 51 (1990) 351-360
19. Gwiazda J., Hyman L., Dong L.M., Everett D., Norton T., Kurtz D., Manny R., Marsh-Tootle W., and Scheiman M. Factors associated with high myopia after 7 years of follow-up in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET) Cohort. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 14 (2007) 230-237
20. Hayes B.P., Fitzke F.W., Hodos W., and Holden A.L. A morphological analysis of experimental myopia in young chickens. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 27 (1986) 981-991
21. Hendrickson P., and Rosenblum W. Accommodation demand and deprivation in kitten ocular development. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 26 (1985) 343-349
22. Howlett M.H., and McFadden S.A. Form-deprivation myopia in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). Vision Res. 46 (2006) 267-283
23. Hung L.F., Crawford M.L., and Smith III E.L. Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nat. Med. 1 (1995) 761-765
24. von Helmholtz H. Treatise on Physiological Optics. third ed. (1909), Verlag von Leopold Voss, Hamburg, Germany Translated by, Southhall, J.P.C., 1962. Dover Publications, New York, p. 379
25. Irving E.L., Callender M.G., and Sivak J.G. Inducing myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism in chicks. Optometry Vis. Sci. 68 (1991) 364-368
26. Irving E.L., Sivak J.G., and Callender M.G. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 12 (1992) 448-456
27. Jensen L.S., and Matson W.E. Enlargement of avian eye by subjecting chicks to continuous incandescent illumination. Science 125 (1957) 741
28. Kisilak M.H., Hunter J.J., Huang L., Campbell M.C.W., and Irving E.L. In chicks wearing high powered negative lenses, spherical aberration is compensated and oblique astigmatism is induced. J. Modern Optics 55 (2008) 611-623
29. Kroger R.H., and Wagner H.J. The eye of the blue acara (Aequidens pulcher, Cichlidae) grows to compensate for defocus due to chromatic aberration. J. Comp. Physiol. [A] 179 (1996) 837-842
30. Kroger R.H., Hirt B., and Wagner H.J. Effects of retinal dopamine depletion on the growth of the fish eye. J. Comp. Physiol. [A] 184 (1999) 403-412
31. Kuszak J.R., Peterson K.L., Sivak J.G., and Herbert K.L. The interrelationship of lens anatomy and optical quality. II. Primate lenses. Exp. Eye Res. 59 (1994) 521-535
32. Lam T.C., Li K.K., Lo S.C., Guggenheim J.A., and To C.H. Application of fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis technology in searching for protein biomarkers in chick myopia. Proteome Res. 6 (2007) 4135-4149
33. Lauber J.K., Shutze J.V., and McGinnis J. Effects of exposure to continuous light on the eye of the growing chick. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 106 (1961) 871-872
34. Li T., Troilo D., Glasser A., and Howland H.C. Constant light produces severe corneal flattening and hyperopia in chickens. Vision Res. 35 (1995) 1203-1209
35. McBrien N.A., and Norton T.T. The development of experimental myopia and ocular component dimensions in monocularly lid-sutured tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri). Vision Res. 32 (1992) 843-852
36. McBrien N.A., Moghaddam H.O., New R., and Williams L.R. Experimental myopia in a diurnal mammal (Sciurus carolinensis) with no accommodative ability. J. Physiol. 469 (1993) 427-441
37. McBrien N.A., Moghaddan H.O., Cottriall C.L., Leech E.M., and Cornell L.M. The effects of blockade of retinal cell action potentials on ocular growth, emmetropization and form deprivation myopia in young chicks. Vision Res. 35 (1995) 1141-1152
38. McKanna J.A., and Casagrande V.A. Reduced lens development in lid suture myopia. Exp. Eye Res. 26 (1978) 715-723
39. Mencl E. Ein Fall von beiderseitiger Augenlinsenausbildung während der Abwesenheit von Augenblasen. Arch. Entw. Mech. Org. 16 (1903) 328-339 Cited by: Chow, R.L., Lang, R.A., 2001. Early eye development in vertebrates. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 255-296
40. Mutti D.O., Zadnik K., and Adams A.J. Myopia. The nature versus nurture debate goes on. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 37 (1996) 952-957
41. Mutti D.O., Zadnik K., and Murphy C.J. The effect of continuous light on refractive error and the ocular components of the rat. Exp. Eye Res. 67 (1998) 631-636
42. Nathan J., Crewther S.G., Crewther D.P., and Kiely P.M. Effects of retinal image degradation on ocular growth in cats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 25 (1984) 1300-1306
43. Pickett-Seltner R.L., Weerheim J., Sivak J.G., and Pasternak J. Experimentally-induced myopia does not affect post-hatching development of the chick lens. Vision Res. 27 (1987) 1779-1782
44. Priolo S., Sivak J.G., and Kuszak J.R. Effect of age on the morphology and optical quality of the avian crystalline lens. Exp. Eye Res. 69 (1999) 629-640
45. Priolo S., Sivak J.G., Kuszak J.R., and Irving E.L. Effects of experimentally induced ametropia on the morphology and optical quality of avian crystalline lens. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41 (2000) 3516-3522
46. Raviola E., and Wiesel T.N. Effect of dark-rearing on experimental myopia in monkeys. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 17 (1978) 485-488
47. Rose L., Yinon U., and Belkin M. Myopia induced in cats deprived of distance vision during development. Vision Res. 14 (1974) 1029-1032
48. Schaeffel F., Glasser A., and Howland H.C. Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens. Vision Res. 28 (1988) 639-657
49. Schaeffel F., Burkhardt E., Howland H.C., and Williams R.W. Measurement of refractive state and deprivation myopia in two strains of mice. Optom. Vis. Sci. 81 (2004) 99-110
50. Seltner R.L., Weerheim J.A., and Sivak J.G. Role of the lens and vitreous humor in the refractive properties of the eyes of three strains of goldfish. Vision Res. 29 (1989) 681-685
51. Shen W., and Sivak J.G. Eyes of a lower vertebrate are susceptible to the visual environment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48 (2007) 4829-4837
52. Shen W., Vijayan M., and Sivak J.G. Inducing form deprivation myopia in fish (Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46 (2005) 1797-1803
53. Sherman S.M., Norton T.T., and Casagrande V.A. Myopia in the lid-sutured tree shrew (Tupaia glis). Brain Res. 124 (1977) 154-157
54. Sivak J.G. Optical variability of the fish lens. In: Douglas R.H., and Djamgoz M.B.A. (Eds). The Visual System of Fish (1990), Chapman and Hall, London 63-80
55. Sivak J.G., and Howland H.C. Accommodation in the northern rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris rupestris) in response to natural stimuli. Vision Res. 13 (1973) 2059-2064
56. Sivak J.G., Ryall L.A., Weerheim J., and Campbell M.C.W. Optical constancy of the chick lens during pre- and post-hatching ocular development. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 30 (1989) 967-974
57. Sivak J.G., Herbert K.L., Peterson K.L., and Kuszak J.R. The interrelationship of lens anatomy and optical quality. I. Non-primate lenses. Exp. Eye Res. 59 (1994) 505-520
58. Smith III E.L., and Hung L.F. The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys. Vision Res. 39 (1999) 1415-1435
59. Smith III E.L., Harwerth R.S., Crawford M.L., and von Norden G.F. Observations on the effects of form deprivation on the refractive status of the monkey. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 28 (1987) 1236-1245
60. Smith III E.L., Bradley D.V., Fernandes A., and Boothe R.G. Form deprivation myopia in adolescent monkeys. Optom. Vis. Sci. 76 (1999) 428-432
61. Stenstrom S. Investigation of the variation and the correlation of the optical elements of human eyes. (Translated by D. Woolf). Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Optics.Monograph. 58 (1948) 1-71
62. Strickler A.G., Yamamoto Y., and Jeffery W.R. The lens controls cell survival in the retina: evidence from the blind cavefish Astyanax. Dev. Biol. (2007 Sep 7) [Epub ahead of print]
63. Tejedor J., and de la Villa P. Refractive changes induced by form deprivation in the mouse eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44 (2003) 32-36
64. Toates F.M. Accommodation function of the human eye. Physiol. Rev. 52 (1972) 828-863
65. Troilo D., and Judge S.J. Ocular development and visual deprivation myopia in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Vision Res. 33 (1993) 1311-1324
66. Troilo D., and Nickla D. The response to visual form deprivation differs with age in marmosets. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46 (2005) 1873-1881
67. Troilo D., Gottlieb M.D., and Wallman J. Visual deprivation causes myopia in chicks with optic nerve section. Curr. Eye Res. 6 (1987) 993-999
68. Troilo D., Nickla D.L., and Wildsoet C.F. Form deprivation myopia in mature common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41 (2000) 2043-2949
69. Wallman J., Turkel J., and Trachtman J. Extreme myopia produced by modest change in early visual experience. Science 201 (1978) 1249-1251
70. Weerheim J., and Sivak J.G. Scanning laser measure of optical quality of the cultured crystalline lens. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 12 (1991) 72-79
71. West J.A., Sivak J.G., and Doughty M.J. Role of accommodation in experimental myopia in chicks. Optom. Vis. Sci. 68 (1991) 847-852
72. Wiesel T.N., and Raviola E. Myopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys. Nature 266 (1977) 66-68
73. Wildsoet C. Neural pathways subserving negative lens-induced emmetropization in chicks-insights from selective lesions of the optic nerve and ciliary nerve. Curr. Eye Res. 27 (2003) 371-385
74. Willikens B., and Vrensen G. Lens fiber organization in four avian species: a scanning electron microscopic study. Tissue Cell 17 (1985) 359-377
75. Youn H.Y., Moran K.L., Oriowo O.M., Bols N.C., and Sivak J.G. Surfactant and UV-B-induced damage of the cultured bovine lens. Toxicol. In Vitro 18 (2004) 841-852
76. Zaidi S., Senchyna M., and Sivak J.G. Quantification of chick lens Alpha A and Delta crystallins in experimentally indirect ametropia. Mol. Vision 8 (2002) 472-476. http://www.molvis.org/molvis/8/a57