Erratum to Comparing Methods to Estimate the Human Lens Power (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2011), 52, (7937-7942), 10.1167/iovs.11-7899);Comparing methods to estimate the human lens power

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 7937-7942

  Rozema, Jos J ^a,b   Atchison, David A ^c   Tassignon, Marie José ^a,b  

^a ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^c QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A SCAN; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EMMETROPIA; EYE AXIS LENGTH; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LENS POWER; LENS SIZE; MALE; MYOPIA; NORMAL HUMAN; PACHOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HISTOLOGY; LENS; LENS IMPLANT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADULT; AGED; BIOMETRY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; EMMETROPIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; OPTICS AND PHOTONICS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84555187310     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7899a     Document Type: Erratum

References (22)

1. Dunne MCM. Scheme for the calculation of ocular components in a 4-surfaced eye without the need for measurement of the anterior crystalline lens surface Purkinje images. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1992;12:370-375.
2. Garner LF. Calculation of the radii of curvature of the crystalline lens surfaces. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997;17:75-80.
3. Rosales P, Wendt M, Marcos S, Glasser A. Changes in crystalline lens radii of curvature and lens tilt and decentration during dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys. J Vis. 2008;8:1-12.
4. Dubbelman M, Van der Heijde GL. The shape of the aging human lens: curvature, equivalent refractive index and the lens paradox. Vision Res. 2001;41:1867-1877.
5. Rosales P, Dubbelman M, Marcos S, van der Heijde R. Crystalline lens radii of curvature from Purkinje and Scheimpflug imaging. J Vis. 2006;6:1057-1067.
6. Bennett AG. A method for determining the equivalent lens powers of the eye and its crystalline lens without resorting to phakometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8:53-59.
7. thed. London: Butterworth; 1952:40-42,344,360-361.
8. Dunne MCM, Barnes DA, Royston JM. An evaluation of Bennett's method for the determining the equivalent lens powers of the eye and its crystalline lens without resorting to phakometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1989;9:69-71.
9. Stenström S. Untersuchungen über die Variation und Kovariation der optischen Elemente des menschlichen Auges. PhD thesis. Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala, 1946.
10. Stenstrom S. Investigation of the variation and the correlation of the optical elements of human eyes. Part II, Translated by Woolf D. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1948;25:286-299.
11. thed. London: Butterworth-Heinemann: 2007:223-227,412-413,425-426.
12. Rozema JJ, Atchison DA, Tassignon MJ. Statistical eye model for normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:4525-4533.
13. Atchison DA, Markwell EL, Kasthurirangan S, Pope JM, Smith G, Swann PG. Age-related changes in optical and biometric characteristics of emmetropic eyes. J Vis. 2008;8:29.
14. Atchison DA. Optical models for human myopic eyes. Vision Res. 2006;46:2236-2250.
15. Van Alphen, GWHM. On emmetropia and ametropia. Ophthalmologica. 1961;(suppl):1-92.
16. Pedrotti LS, Pedrotti FL. Optics and Vision. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998:77.
17. Sorsby A, Benjamin B, Davey JB, Sheridan M, Tanner JM. Emmetropia and its aberrations; a study in the correlation of the optical components of the eye. Spec Rep Ser Med Res Counc (GB). 1957;11(293):1-69.
18. Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:700-712. (Zuberbuhler B, Morrell AJ. Errata in printed Hoffer Q formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:2; author reply: 2-3).
19. Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16:333-340.
20. Sheard RM, Smith GT, Cooke DL. Improving the prediction accuracy of the SRK/T formula: the T2 formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1829-1834.
21. Gobin L, Rozema JJ, Tassignon M-J. Review of IOL power calculation: a theoretical analysis of proposed formulas. In: Garg A, Lin JT, Lathkany R, Bovet J, Halgis W, eds. Mastering the Techniques of IOL Power Calculations. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India; Jaypee 2009:Chapter 54.
22. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2007;85:472-485.