Optical power of the isolated human crystalline lens

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 2541-2548

  Borja, David ^a,b   Manns, Fabrice ^a,b   Ho, Arthur ^c,d,e   Ziebarth, Noel ^a,b   Rosen, Alexandre M ^a,b   Jain, Rakhi ^f   Amelinckx, Adriana ^a   Arrieta, Esdras ^a   Augusteyn, Robert C ^e,g   Parel, Jean Marie ^a,b,e,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Miami College of Engineering   (United States)

^c BRIEN HOLDEN VISION INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^e VISION COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Australia)

^f Advanced Medical Optics Inc   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^h UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; AGE DETERMINATION; AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CHILD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EYE; EYE AXIS LENGTH; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; LENS; LENS POWER; OPTOMETRY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIUS; REFRACTION INDEX; REFRACTOMETRY; SCHOOL CHILD; VISUAL SYSTEM; ADOLESCENT; AGING; EYE REFRACTION; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MIDDLE AGED; REFRACTION, OCULAR;

EID: 47249131601     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1385     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Atchison DA, Smith G. Optics of the Human Eye. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann; 2000.
2. Mutti D, Zadnik K, Adams A. A video technique for phakometry of the human crystalline lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33(5):1771-1782.
3. Garner LF. Calculation of the radii of curvature of the crystalline lens surfaces. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997;17(1):75-80. (Pubitemid 27037697)
4. Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB. Clinical Visual Optics. 3rd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998:211-399.
5. Bennett AG. A method of determining the equivalent powers of the eye and its crystalline lens without resort to phakometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8(1):53-59.
6. Mutti D, Zadnik K, Adams A. The equivalent refractive index of the crystalline lens in childhood. Vision Res. 1995;35(11):1565-1573.
7. Koretz JE, Strenk SA, Strenk LM, Semmlow JL. Scheimpflug and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior segment: a comparative study. J Opt Soc Am A. 2004;21(3):346-354.
8. Rosales P, Dubbelman M, Marcos S, van der Heijde R. Crystalline lens radii of curvature from Purkinje and Scheimpflug imaging. J Vision. 2006;6(10):1057-1067. (Pubitemid 44458096)
9. Howcroft MJ, Parker JA. Aspheric curvatures for the human lens. Vision Res. 1977;17(10):1217-1223. (Pubitemid 8342718)
10. Sivak JG, Kreuzer RO. Spherical aberration of the crystalline lens. Vision Res. 1983;23(1):59-70. (Pubitemid 13168092)
11. Pierscionek BK, Chan DY. Refractive index gradient of human lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66(12):822-829. (Pubitemid 20078794)
12. Glasser A, Campbell MC. Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age. Vision Res. 1998;38:209-229. (Pubitemid 27503836)
13. Glasser A, Campbell MCW. Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia. Vision Res. 1999;39:1991-2015.
14. Schachar RA. Central surface curvatures of postmortem-extracted intact human crystalline lenses: implications for understanding the mechanism of accommodation. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1699-1704. (Pubitemid 39179685)
15. Moffat BA, Atchison DA, Pope JM. Age-related changes in refractive index distribution and power of the human lens as measured by magnetic resonance micro-imaging in vitro. Vision Res. 2002;42:1683-1693. (Pubitemid 34655503)
16. Jones CE, Atchison DA, Meder R, Pope JM. Refractive index distribution and optical properties of the isolated human lens measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Vision Res. 2005;45(18):2352-2366. (Pubitemid 40848281)
17. Dubbelman M, Van der Heijde GL, Weeber HA. Change in shape of the aging human crystalline lens with accommodation. Vision Res. 2005;45:117-132. (Pubitemid 39574762)
18. Augusteyn RC, Rosen AM, Borja D, Ziebarth NM, Parel JM. Biometry of primate lenses during immersion in preservation media. Mol Vis. 2006;12:740-747.
19. Burd HJ, Judge SJ, Cross JA. Numerical modelling of the accommodating lens. Vision Res. 2002;42(18):2235-2251. (Pubitemid 35245932)
20. Schachar RA, Abolmaali A, Le T. Insights into the age-related decline in the amplitude of accommodation of the human lens using a non-linear finite-element model. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(10):1304-1309. (Pubitemid 44621497)
21. Hermans EA, Dubbelman M, van der Heijde GL, Heethaar RM. Estimating the external force acting on the human eye lens during accommodation by finite element modelling. Vision Res. 2006;46:3642-3650. (Pubitemid 44344297)
22. Manns F, Parel JM, Denham D, et al. Optomechanical response of human and monkey lenses in a lens stretcher. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(7):3260-3268.
23. Rosen AM, Denham DB, Fernandez V, et al. In vitro dimensions and curvatures of human lenses. Vision Res. 2006;46:1002-1009. (Pubitemid 43016130)
24. Denham D, Holland S, Mandelbaum S, Pflugfelder S, Parel JM. Shadow photogrammetric apparatus for the quantitative evaluation of corneal buttons. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989;20:794-799. (Pubitemid 20036552)
25. Manns F, Fernandez V, Zipper S, et al. Radius of curvature and asphericity of the anterior and posterior surface of human cadaver crystalline lenses. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78(1):39-51. (Pubitemid 37518243)
26. Garner LF, Yap M, Scott R. Crystalline lens power in myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69(11):863-865. (Pubitemid 23011134)
27. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Friedman NE, Adams AJ. Initial cross-sectional results from the Orinda Longitudinal Study of Myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70(9):750-758. (Pubitemid 23274123)
28. Hemenger RP, Garner LF, Ooi CS. Change with age of the refractive index gradient of the human ocular lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36(3):703-707.
29. Goss DA, Van Veen HG, Rainey BB, Feng B. Ocular components measured by keratometry, phakometry, and ultrasonography in emmetropic and myopic optometry students. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(7):489-495. (Pubitemid 27377623)
30. Jones LA, Mitchell GL, Mutti DO, et al. Comparison of ocular component growth curves among refractive error groups in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(7):2317-2327. (Pubitemid 43119475)
31. Ip JM, Huynh SC, Kifley A, et al. Variation of the contribution from axial length and other oculometric parameters to refraction by age and ethnicity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(10):4846-4853.
32. Dubbelman M, Van der Heijde GL. The shape of the aging human lens: curvature, equivalent refractive index and the lens paradox. Vision Res. 2001;41:1867-1877. (Pubitemid 32429543)
33. Duane A. Normal values of the accommodation at all ages. JAMA. 1912;59:1010-1013.
34. Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, et al. Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during emmetropization in infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(9):3074-3080. (Pubitemid 44264290)
35. Garner LF, Yap MK. Changes in ocular dimensions and refraction with accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997;17(1):12-17. (Pubitemid 27037689)