NOT KNOWING WHAT WE DON'T KNOW: Reframing The Importance of Automated Knowledge for Educational Research1

Avoiding Simplicity, Confronting Complexity: Advances in Studying and Designing (Computer-Based) Powerful Learning Evironments

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 3-14

  Clark, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892814627     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789087901189_002     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1995). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51, 355-365.
2. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (Eds.). (1998). Atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Bargh, J. A. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.
4. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.
5. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (Eds.) (2004). The handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research and applications. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
6. Chao, C.-J., & Salvendy, G. (1994). Percentage of procedural knowledge acquired as a function of the number of experts from whom knowledge is acquired for diagnosis, debugging and interpretation tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 221-233.
7. Clark, R. E. (1999). Yin and Yang Cognitive motivational process operating in multimedia learning environments. In J. J. G. van Merrienboer (Ed.), Cognition and multimedia design, proceedings of an inauguration presented July, 1999 at the Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, Netherlands.
8. Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (2002). Turning research into results: A guide to selecting the right performance solutions. Atlanta, GE: CEP Press.
9. Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (2000). A proposal for the collaborative development of authentic performance technology. Performance Improvement, 40(4), 48-53.
10. Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (1999). The development of authentic educational technologies, Educational Technology, 37(2), 5-16.
11. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory. A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-114.
12. Davison, G. C., Vogel, R. S., Coffman, S. G. (1997). Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment and the articulated thoughts in simulated situations paradigm. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 65(6), 950-958.
13. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
14. Efldides, A. (2005). Motivation and affect in the self-regulation of behavior. European Psychologist, 10(3), 173-174.
15. Efldides, A. (2005). Motivation and affect in the self-regulation of behavior. European Psychologist, 10(3), 173-174.
16. Feldon, D. F. (2004). Inaccuracies in expert self-report: Errors in the description of strategies for designing psychology experiments. Unpublished PhD dissertation presented to the Educational Psychology faculty of the Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.
17. Flad, J. A. (2002). The impact of increasing cognitive load and dual task measures of mental effort during problem solving. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation presented to the Educational Psychology faculty of the Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.
18. Gimino, A. (2000). Students' investment of mental effort: A validation and exploratory study. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Cognitive, Social and Motivational Processes Division, April, 2002, New Orleans, LA.
19. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
20. Greenwald, A., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
21. Helmuth, L. (2001). Beyond the pleasure principle. Science, 294, 983-984.
22. Hinds, P. J. (1999). The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on predictions of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5(2), 205-221.
23. Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight Bias: A byproduct of knowledge updating? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 566-581.
24. Kalyuga, S, Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., and Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 579-588.
25. Kendeou, P. & van den Broek, P. (2005). The effects of readers' misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology. 97(2), 235-245.
26. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimally guided learning does not work: An analysis of the failure of discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning and inquiry-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
27. Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 201, 557-558.
28. Lee, R. L. (2004). The impact of cognitive task analysis on pe, jormance: A meta analysis of comparative studies. Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation presented to the faculty of the Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.
29. Lieberman, M. D., Ochsner, K. N., Gilbert, D. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). Do amnesiacs exhibit cognitive dissonance reduction? Psychological Science, 12, 135-140.
30. Maupin, F. (2003). Comparing cognitive task analysis to behavior task analysis in training first year interns to place central venous catheters. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
31. Mayer, R. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strike rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19.
33. Merrill, M. D. (2002a). A pebble-in-the-pond model for instructional design. Performance Improvement, 41(7), 39-44.
34. Merrill, M. D., (2002b). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59.
35. Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. D. (2006). Finding "meaning" in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61 (3), 192-203.
36. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Paas, F., Renk!, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1-4.
38. Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
39. Sasaki, H. M. (2004, July). Stereotype automaticity interventions: The vagaries of implicit attitude change. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, Hawaii.
40. Schneider, W., & Chein, J. W. (2003). Controlled & automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27, 525-559.
41. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
42. Schraagen, J. M., Chipman, S. F., and Shalin, V, L. (2000). Cognitive task analysis. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Stone, A. A., Turkkan, J. S., Bachrach, C. A., Jobe, J. B., Kurtzman, H. S., Cain, V. S. (Eds.) (2000). The science of self-report: 1mplicationsfor research and practice. Mahwah N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Sun, R., Slusarz, P., & Terry, C. (2005). The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: A dual-process approach. Psychological Review, 112, 159-192.
45. Sweller, J. (2006). How the human cognitive system deals with complexity. In J. Elen, & R. E. Clark, (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research (pp. 13-25). Oxford: Elsevier.
46. van Merrienboer, J. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
47. van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design principles for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5-13.
48. Velmahos, G. C., Toutouzas, K. G., Sillin, L. F., Chan, L., Clark, R. E., Theodorou, D., & Maupin, F. (2004). Cognitive task analysis for teaching technical skills in an inanimate surgical skills laboratory. The American Journal of Surgery, 18, 114-119.
49. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and instruction, 4, 45-70.
50. Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature ofna1ve physics. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 610-676). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
51. Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
52. Wheatley, T., & Wegner, D. M. (2001). Automaticity of action. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), international encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 991-993). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Limited.
53. Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224-228.