The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on predictions of novice performance

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 205-221

  Hinds, Pamela J ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003041003     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.5.2.205     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
2. Bolger, F., & Wright, G. (1992). Reliability and validity in expert judgment. In F. Bolger & G. Wright (Eds.), Expertise and decision support (pp. 47-76). New York: Plenum Press.
3. Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 366-381.
4. Byram, S. (1996). Cognitive and motivational factors influencing time prediction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 216-239.
5. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Weber, M. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1232-1254.
6. Chase, W. G., & Ericsson, K. A. (1982). Skill and working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 16, pp. 1-58). New York: Academic Press.
7. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215-281). New York: Academic Press.
8. Connolly, T., & Dean, D. (1997). Decomposed versus holistic estimates of effort required for software writing tasks. Management Sciences, 43, 1029-1045.
9. Davis, H. L., Hoch, S. J., & Ragsdale, E. K. (1986). An anchoring and adjustment model of spousal predictions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 25-37.
10. DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P., & Meglino, B. M. (1984). A cognitive model of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 360-396.
11. Engle, P. L., & Lumpkin, J. B. (1992). How accurate are time-use reports? Effects of cognitive enhancement and cultural differences on recall accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 141-159.
12. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725-747.
13. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1997). Cognitive and developmental factors in expert performance. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context: human and machine (pp. 3-41). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
14. Feldman, J. M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127-148.
15. Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119-136.
16. Hoch, S. J. (1984). Availability and interference in predictive judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 649-662.
17. Ilgen, D. R., & Feldman, J. M. (1983). Performance appraisal: A process focus. In L. Commings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 141-197). San Francisco: JAI Press.
18. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Studies in Management Science, 12, 313-327.
19. Kidd, J. B. (1970). The utilization of subjective probabilities in production planning. Acta Psychologica, 34, 338-347.
20. Langer, E. J., & Imber, L. G. (1979). When practice makes imperfect: Debilitating effects of overlearning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2014-2024.
21. Marcus, G. B. (1986). Stability and change in political attitudes: Observe, recall and "explain." Political Behavior, 8, 21-44.
22. Miller, N., & Campbell, D. T. (1959). Recency and primary in persuasion as a function of timing of speeches and measurements. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 1-9.
23. Nickerson, R. S., Baddeley, A., & Freeman, B. (1987). Are people's estimates of what other people know influenced by what they themselves know? Acta Psychologica, 64, 245-259.
24. Osberg, T. M., & Shrauger, J. S. (1986). Self-prediction: Exploring the parameters of accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1044-1057.
25. Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 261-265.
26. Ross, L. D., Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485-494.
27. Ross, M., & Newby-Clark, I. R. (1998). Construing the past and future. Social Cognition, 16, 133-150.
28. Simon, H. A. (1989). Models of thought (Vol. 2). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Simon, H. A., Larkin, J. H., & McDermott, J. H. (1980, June 20). Experts and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335-1342.
30. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Cognitive conceptions of expertise. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context: Human and machine (pp. 149-162). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
31. Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331-376). New York: Academic Press.
32. Thompson, C. P., & Mingay, D. (1991). Estimating the frequency of everyday events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 497-510.
33. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
34. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974, September 27). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
35. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806-820.
36. Zalesny, M. D., & Highhouse, S. (1992). Accuracy in performance evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 22-50.