I want to lie about not knowing you, but my precuneus refuses to cooperate

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Lee, Tatia M C ^a   Leung, Mei Kei ^a   Lee, Tiffany M Y ^a   Raine, Adrian ^b   Chan, Chetwyn C H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DECEPTION; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRECUNEUS; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DECEPTION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84892773084     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep01636     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Hartwig, M. & Bond, C. F. Why dolie-catchers fail?Alens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychol. Bull. 137, 643-659 (2011).
2. Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S. & Leal, S. Outsmarting the liars: Towards a cognitive lie detection approach. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 28-32 (2011).
3. Aamodt, M. G. & Custer, H. Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. Forensic Examiner 15, 6-11 (2006).
4. Bond, C. F., Jr. & DePaulo, B. M. Accuracy of deception judgments. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 214-234 (2006).
5. O'Sullivan, M., Frank, M. G., Hurley, C. M. & Tiwana, J. Police lie detection accuracy: the effect of lie scenario. Law Hum. Behav. 33, 530-538 (2009).
6. Abe, N. How the brain shapes deception: an integrated review of the literature. Neuroscientist 17, 560-574 (2011).
7. Abe, N. et al. Dissociable roles of prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices in deception. Cereb. Cortex 16, 192-199 (2006).
8. Ganis, G., Kosslyn, S. M., Stose, S., Thompson, W. L. & Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. Cereb. Cortex 13, 830-836 (2003).
9. Ito, A. et al. The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception when remembering neutral and emotional events. Neurosci. Res. 69, 121-128 (2011).
10. Karim, A. A. et al. The truth about lying: inhibition of the anterior prefrontal cortex improves deceptive behavior. Cereb. Cortex 20, 205-213 (2010).
11. Langleben, D. D. et al. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast eventrelated fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 26, 262-272 (2005).
12. Langleben, D. D. et al. Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Neuroimage 15, 727-732 (2002).
13. Lee, T. M. et al. Neural correlates of feigned memory impairment. Neuroimage 28, 305-313 (2005).
14. Lee, T. M. et al. Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 157-164 (2002).
15. Lee, T. M., Lee, T. M. Y., Raine, A. & Chan, C. C. Lying about the valence of affective pictures: an fMRI study. PLoS One 5, e12291 (2010).
16. Spence, S. A. et al. Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport 12, 2849-2853 (2001).
17. Spence, S. A. et al. A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 359, 1755-1762 (2004).
18. Spence, S. A., Kaylor-Hughes, C., Farrow, T. F. & Wilkinson, I. D. Speaking of secrets and lies: the contribution of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to vocal deception. Neuroimage 40, 1411-1418 (2008).
19. Aue, T., Lavelle, L. A. & Cacioppo, J. T. Great expectations: what can fMRI research tell us about psychological phenomena? Int. J. Psychophysiol. 73, 10-16 (2009).
20. Monteleone, G. T. et al. Detection of deception using fMRI: better than chance, but well below perfection. Soc. Neurosci. 4, 528-538 (2009).
21. Sip, K. E., Roepstorff, A., McGregor, W. & Frith, C. D. Detecting deception: the scope and limits. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 48-53 (2008).
22. Sip, K. E., Roepstorff, A., McGregor, W. & Frith, C. D. Response to Haynes: There's more to deception than brain activity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 127-128 (2008).
23. Wolpe, P. R., Foster, K. R. & Langleben, D. D. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils. Am. J. Bioeth. 5, 39-49 (2005).
24. Bunge, S. A., Hazeltine, E., Scanlon, M. D., Rosen, A. C. & Gabrieli, J. D. Dissociable contributions of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection. Neuroimage 17, 1562-1571 (2002).
25. Bush, G. et al. The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging-validation study with functional MRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 6, 270-282 (1998).
26. Carter, C. S. et al. Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 1944-1948 (2000).
27. Christ, S. E., Van Essen, D. C., Watson, J. M., Brubaker, L. E. & McDermott, K. B. The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. Cereb. Cortex 19, 1557-1566 (2009).
28. Courtney, S. M., Petit, L., Maisog, J. M., Ungerleider, L. G. & Haxby, J. V. An area specialized for spatial working memory in human frontal cortex. Science 279, 1347-1351 (1998).
29. Crottaz-Herbette, S., Anagnoson, R. T. & Menon, V. Modality effects in verbal working memory: differential prefrontal and parietal responses to auditory and visual stimuli. Neuroimage 21, 340-351 (2004).
30. Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Marshuetz, C., Koeppe, R. A. & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 8410-8413 (1998).
31. Kozel, F. A. et al. Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biol. Psychiatry 58, 605-613 (2005).
32. Smith, E. E., Jonides, J. & Koeppe, R. A. Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. Cereb. Cortex 6, 11-20 (1996).
33. Gobbini, M. I. & Haxby, J. V. Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia 45, 32-41 (2007).
34. Gobbini, M. I. & Haxby, J. V. Neural response to the visual familiarity of faces. Brain Res. Bull. 71, 76-82 (2006).
35. Bhatt, S. et al. Lying about facial recognition: an fMRI study. Brain Cogn. 69, 382-390 (2009).
36. Farrow, T. F. et al. Sex and personality traits influence the difference between time taken to tell the truth or lie. Percept. Mot. Skills 97, 451-460 (2003).
37. Johnson, R., Jr., Barnhardt, J. & Zhu, J. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding. Neuropsychologia 42, 878-901 (2004).
38. Priori, A. et al. Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception. Cereb. Cortex 18, 451-455 (2008).
39. Vendemia, J. M., Buzan, R. F. & Simon-Dack, S. L. Reaction time of motor responses in two-stimulus paradigms involving deception and congruity with varying levels of difficulty. Behav. Neurol. 16, 25-36 (2005).
40. Gobbini, M. I., Leibenluft, E., Santiago, N. & Haxby, J. V. Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces. Neuroimage 22, 1628-1635 (2004).
41. Cavanna, A. E. & Trimble, M. R. The precuneus: a review ofits functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129, 564-583 (2006).
42. Gilboa, A., Winocur, G., Grady, C. L., Hevenor, S. J. & Moscovitch, M. Remembering our past: functional neuroanatomy of recollection of recent and very remote personal events. Cereb. Cortex 14, 1214-1225 (2004).
43. Eustache, F. et al. 'In the course of time': a PET study of the cerebral substrates of autobiographical amnesia in Alzheimer's disease. Brain 127, 1549-1560 (2004).
44. Kosaka, H. et al. Neural substrates participating in acquisition of facial familiarity: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 20, 1734-1742 (2003).
45. Leibenluft, E., Gobbini, M. I., Harrison, T. & Haxby, J. V. Mothers' neural activation in response to pictures of their children and other children. Biol. Psychiatry 56, 225-232 (2004).
46. Oldfield, R. C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97-113 (1971).