Reaction time of motor responses in two-stimulus paradigms involving deception and congruity with varying levels of difficulty

Behavioural Neurology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 25-36

  Vendemia, Jennifer M C ^a   Buzan, Robert F ^a   Simon Dack, Stephanie L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AROUSAL; EMOTIONALITY; MEMORY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECUMBENCY; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 23644440972     PISSN: 09534180     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2005/804026     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. J.B. Allen, W.G. Iacono and K.D. Danielson, The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavior measures: A methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences, Psychophysiology 29 (1992), 504-522.
2. J.B. Allen and W.G. Iacono, A comparison of methods for the analysis of event-related potentials in deception detection, Psychophysiology 34 (1997), 234-240.
3. C. Backster, Standardized Polygraph Notepack and Technique Guide: Backster Zone Comparison Technique, Backster School of Lie Detection, New York, NY, 1963.
4. T.R. Bashore and P.E. Rapp, Are there alternatives to traditional polygraph procedures? Psychological Bulletin 113 (1993), 3-22.
5. G. Ben-Shakhar and E. Elaad, The Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) as an application of psychophysiology: Future prospects and obstacles, in: Handbook of polygraph testing, M. Kleiner, ed., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2002, pp. 87-102.
6. T.L. Boaz, N.W. Perry, G. Raney, I.S. Fischler et al., Detection of guilty knowledge with event-related potentials, Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (1991), 788-795.
7. H.R. Crosland, The psychological methods of word-association and reaction-time as tests of deception, University of Oregon Publications, Psychology Series (1929), 1872-1966.
8. D.P. Dionisio, E. Granholm, W.A. Hillix and W.F. Perrine, Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing, Psychophysiology 38 (2001), 205-211.
9. J. Downar, A.P. Crawley, D.J. Mikulis and K.D. Davis, A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities, Journal of Neurophysiology 87 (2002), 615-620.
10. J. Ellwanger, J.P. Rosenfeld, J.J. Sweet and M. Bhatt, Detecting simulated amnesia for autobiographical and recently learned information using the P300 event-related potential, International Journal of Psychophysiology 23 (1996), 9-23.
11. H.B. English, Reaction-time symptoms of deception, American Journal of Psychology 37 (1926), 428-429.
12. L.A. Farwell and E. Donchin, The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (lie detection) with event-related brain potentials, Psychophysiology 28 (1991), 531-547.
13. S.E. Fienberg, J.J. Blascovich, J.T. Cacioppo, R.J. Davidson, P. Ekman, D.L. Faigman et al., Polygraph and Lie Detection-Evaluation, The National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
14. I. Furumitsu, Laboratory investigations in the psychophysiological detection of deception, Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 61 (2000), 583.
15. V.A. Gheorghiu and M. Huebner, Die Sensorische Suggestibilitaetsskala (SSK) als Erhebungsverfahren fuer Taeuschbarkeit. The Scale of Sensory Suggestibility as assessment of deception, Experimentelle und Klinische Hypnose 8 (1992), 117-129.
16. E.R. Goldstein, Reaction Times and the Consciousness of Deception, American Journal of Psychology 34 (1923), 562-581.
17. J. Hindman and J.M. Peters, Polygraph testing leads to better understanding adult and juvenile sex offenders, Federal Probation 65 (2001), 8-15.
18. C.R. Honts and D.C. Raskin, A field study of the validity of the directed lie control question, Journal of Police Science and Administration 16 (1988), 56-61.
19. S. Horowitz, J.C. Kircher and C.R. Honts, The role of comparison questions in physiological detection of deception, Psychophysiology 34 (1997), 108-115.
20. A.D. Jones, R.Y. Cho, L.E. Nystrom, J.D. Cohen and T.S. Braver, A computational model of anterior cingulated function in speeded response tasks: Effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict, Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 2 (2002), 300-317.
21. A. Kok, On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity, Psychophysiology 38 (2001), 557-577.
22. D. Krapohl and S. Sturm, Terminology Reference for the Science of Psychophysiological Detection of Deception, (2nd ed.), American Polygraph Association, 2002.
23. J.A. Larson, Lying and its detection, University of Chicago Press, Oxford, 1932.
24. A.R. Luria, Die Methode des abbildenden Motorik in der Tatbestands-Diagnostik. The method of recording movements in crime detection, Zeitschrift fuer Angewandte Psychologie 35 (1930), 139-183.
25. D.T. Lykken, Properties of electrodes used in electrodermal measurement, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 52 (1959), 629-634.
26. D.T. Lykken, The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking, Journal of Applied Psychology 44 (1960), 258-262.
27. D.T. Lykken, Trial by polygraph, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 2 (1984), 75-92.
28. D.T. Lykken, A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector, Plenum Press, New York, 1998.
29. V.V. MacLaren, A qualitative review of the Guilty Knowledge Test, Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2001), 674-683.
30. H. Mager, Deception: a study in forensic psychology, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 26 (1931), 183-198.
31. W. Marston, Reaction time symptoms of deception, United Kingdom: Lancet 60 (1920), 72-87.
32. W.M. Marston, Psychological Possibilities in the Deception Tests, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 11 (1921), 551-570.
33. W.M. Marston, Negative type reaction-time symptoms of deception, Psychological Review 32 (1925), 241-247.
34. I. Neath and A.M. Surprenant, Human Memory, (2nd ed.), Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA, 2003.
35. [OTA], Scientfic Validity of Polygraph Testing: A Research Review and Evaluation - A Technical Memorandum, US Congress, Washington, DC, 1983, pp. 5-113.
36. J.A. Podlesny and C.M. Truslow, Validity of an expanded issue (modified general question) polygraph technique in a simulated distributed-crime-roles context, Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (1993), 788-797.
37. D.C. Raskin, J.C. Kircher, S.W. Horowitz and C. R. Honts, Recent laboratory and field research on polygraph techniques, in: Credibility Assessment, J.C. Yuille, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 1989, pp. 1-24.
38. J.E. Reid and F.E. Inbau, Truth and deception: The polygraph (Lie Detection) technique, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1977.
39. J.P. Rosenfeld, Alternative views of Bashore and Rapp's (1993) alternatives to traditional polygraphy: A critique, Psychological Bulletin 117 (1995), 159-166.
40. J.P. Rosenfeld, J.J. Sweet, J. Chuang, J. Ellwanger et al., Detection of simulated malingering using forced choice recognition enhanced with event-related potential recording, Clinical Neuropsychologist 2 (1996), 163-179.
41. M. Sasaki, S. Hira and T. Matsuda, Effects of a mental counter-measure on the physiological detection of deception using the event-related brain potentials, Japanese Journal of Psychology 74 (2001), 322-328.
42. S.R. Schroeder, Selective eye fixation during transfer of discriminative stimulus control, in: Environment and Behavior, D.M. Baer and E.M. Pinkston, eds, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997, pp. 97-110.
43. T.L. Seymour, C.M. Seifert, M.G. Shaft and L. Mosmann, Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge", Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2000), 30-37.
44. J.M.C. Vendemia, Hobson's Choice: The relationship between consequences and the comparison question, Polygraph 31 (2002), 20-25.
45. J.M.C. Vendemia, Neural mechanisms of deception and response congruity to general knowledge information and autobiographical information in visual two-stimulus paradigms with motor response, Department of Defense Polygraph Institute (DoDPI99-P-0010), 2003.
46. J.M.C. Vendemia and R.F. Buzan, Neural mechanisms of deception and response congruity in a visual two stimulus paradigm involving autobiographical information, Psychophysiology40(Suppl. 1) (2003), S88.
47. A. Vrij and S. Heaven, Vocal and verbal indicators of deception as a function of lie complexity, Psychology, Crime and Law 5 (1999), 203-215.
48. M. Wertheimer, D.B. King, M.A. Peckler and S. Raney, Carl Jung and Max Wertheimer on a priority issue, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 2 (1992), 45-56.