Sex and personality traits influence the difference between time taken to tell the truth or lie

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 451-460

  Farrow, Tom F D ^a   Reilly, Rebecca ^a   Rahman, Towhida A ^a   Herford, Amy E ^a   Woodruff, Peter W R ^a   Spence, Sean A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REACTION TIME; RECALL; RECUMBENCY; REFERENCE VALUE;

ADULT; DECEPTION; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 1542572358     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.2.451     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BADDELEY, A. D. (1966) The capacity for generating information by randomization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 119-129.
2. BASHORE, T. R., & RAPP, P. E. (1993) Are there alternatives to traditional polygraph procedures? Psychological Bulletin, 113, 3-22.
3. BIREMBAUM, M., & MONTAG, J. (1989) Style and substance in social desirability scales. European Journal of Personality, 3, 47-59.
4. BRETT, A. S., PHILLIPS, M., & BREARY, J. F. (1986) Predictive power of the polygraph: can the 'lie detector' really detect liars? Lancet, 1(8480), 544-547.
5. BROWN, M. S., & KODADEK, S. M. (1987) The use of the lie scale in psychometric measures of children. Research in Nursing and Health, 10, 87-92.
6. EYSENCK, H. J., & EYSENCK, S. B. G. (1975) Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London, UK: Hodder & Stoughton.
7. EYSENCK, S. B. G., EYSENCK, H. J., & BARRETT, P. (1985) A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21-29.
8. FARWELL, L. A., & DONCHIN, E. (1991) The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531-547.
9. FORREST, S., LEWIS, C. A., & SHEVLIN, M. (2000) Examining the factor structure and differential functioning on the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised-Abbreviated. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 579-588.
10. GERVAIS, J., TREMBLAY, R. E., DESMARAIS-GERVAIS, L., & VITARO, F. (2000) Children's persistent lying, gender differences and disruptive behaviours: a longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 24, 213-221.
11. HALPERT, E. (2000) On lying and the lie of a toddler. Psychoanalysis Quarterly, 69, 659-675.
12. IACONO, W. G. (2000) The detection of deception. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. C. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology. (2nd ed.) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 772-793.
13. JACKSON, C. J., & FRANCIS, L. J. (1999) Interpreting the correlation between neuroticism and lie scale scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 59-63.
14. KLEINMUNTZ, B., & SZUCKO, J. (1984) A field study of the fallibility of polygraphic lie detection. Nature, 308, 449-450.
15. LANGLEBEN, D. D., SCHROEDER, L., MALDJIAN, J. A., GUR, R. C., MCDONALD, S., RAGLAND, J. D., O'BRIEN, C. P., & CHILDRESS, A. R. (2002) Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study. NeuroImage, 15, 727-732.
16. LEE, T. M., LIU, H. L., TAN, L. H., CHAN, C. C., MAHANKALI, S., FENG, C. M., HOU, J., FOX, P. T., & GAO, J. H. (2002) Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 157-164.
17. LYKKEN, D. T. (1998) A tremor in the blood: uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. NELSON, H. E., & WILLISON, J. (1982) National Adult Reading Test. (2nd ed.) Berkshire, UK: NFER-Nelson.
19. The Oxford modern English dictionary. (1994) Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
20. PAULHUS, D. L., & REID, D. B. (1991) Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307-317.
21. SEYMOUR, T. L., SEIFERT, C. M., SHAFTO, M. G., & MOSMANN, A. L. (2000) Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge". Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 30-37.
22. SPENCE, S. A., FARROW, T. F. D., HERFORD, A. E., WILKINSON, I. D., ZHENG, Y., & WOODRUFF, P. W. R. (2001) Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. NeuroReport, 12, 2849-2853.
23. STEINBROOK, R. (1992) The polygraph test: a flawed diagnostic method. New England Journal of Medicine, 327, 122-123.
24. VRIJ, A. (2001a) Detecting the liars. Psychologist, 14, 596-598.
25. VRIJ, A. (2001b) Detecting lies and deceit: the psychology of lying and the implications for professional practise. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
26. ZIGMOND, A., & SNAITH, R. P. (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361-370.