Detecting deception: the scope and limits

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 48-53

  Sip, Kamila E ^a,b   Roepstorff, Andreas ^a,b   McGregor, William ^b   Frith, Chris D ^a,c  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

COMMERCIAL APPLICATION; NEUROIMAGING;

IMAGING TECHNIQUES;

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GUILT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MENTAL CAPACITY; NEUROIMAGING; TECHNOLOGY;

BRAIN; COGNITION; DECEPTION; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RISK MANAGEMENT; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 38749133696     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Knight J. The truth about lying. Nature 428 (2004) 692-694
2. Garreau, J. (2006) Brain on fire. The Washington Post, 30 October, online edn. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/29/AR20061 02900895.html)
3. Henig, R.M. (2006) Looking for the lie. The New York Times, 5 February
4. Talbot, M. (2007) Can brain scans uncover lies? The New Yorker, 2 July
5. Wolpe P.R., et al. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils. Am. J. Bioeth. 5 (2005) 39-49
6. Appelbaum P.S. The new lie detectors: neuroscience, deception, and the courts. Psychiatr. Serv. 58 (2007) 460-462
7. Vrij A. Guidelines to catch a liar. In: Granhag P.-A., and Stromwall L. (Eds). The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts (2004), Cambridge University Press 287-314
8. Verschueren J. Understanding Pragmatics (1999), Arnold
9. Rushworth M.F., et al. Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 410-417
10. Rogers R.D., et al. Distinct portions of anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex are activated by reward processing in separable phases of decision-making cognition. Biol. Psychiatry 55 (2004) 594-602
11. Frith U., and Frith C.D. Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358 (2003) 459-473
12. Frith C.D., and Frith U. How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Res. 1079 (2006) 36-46
13. Lieberman M.D. Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58 (2007) 259-289
14. Decety J., et al. The neural bases of cooperation and competition: an fMRI investigation. Neuroimage 23 (2004) 744-751
15. Amodio D.M., and Frith C.D. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7 (2006) 268-277
16. Aron A.R., et al. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (2004) 170-177
17. Blasi G., et al. Brain regions underlying response inhibition and interference monitoring and suppression. Eur. J. Neurosci. 23 (2006) 1658-1664
18. Barch D.M., et al. Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of response modality and processing domain. Cereb. Cortex 11 (2001) 837-848
19. Ganis G., et al. Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. Cereb. Cortex 13 (2003) 830-836
20. Nunez J.M., et al. Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control. Neuroimage 25 (2005) 267-277
21. Abe N., et al. Deceiving others: distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19 (2007) 287-295
22. Langleben D.D., et al. Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Neuroimage 15 (2002) 727-732
23. Langleben D.D., et al. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 26 (2005) 262-272
24. Phan K.L., et al. Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla. Acad. Radiol. 12 (2005) 164-172
25. Gamer M., et al. Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28 (2007) 1287-1301
26. Grèzes J., et al. Brain mechanisms for inferring deceit in the actions of others. J. Neurosci. 24 (2004) 5500-5505
27. Grèzes J., et al. Amygdala activation when one is the target of deceit: did he lie to you or to someone else?. Neuroimage 30 (2006) 601-608
28. Poldrack R.A. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 (2006) 59-63
29. Phan K.L., et al. Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage 16 (2002) 331-348
30. Tom S.M., et al. The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science 315 (2007) 515-518
31. Coricelli G., et al. Regret and its avoidance: a neuroimaging study of choice behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1255-1262
32. Rypma B., et al. The influence of working-memory demand and subject performance on prefrontal cortical activity. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14 (2002) 721-731
33. Ochsner K.N., and Gross J.J. The cognitive control of emotion. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 (2005) 242-249
34. Kamitani Y., and Tong F. Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 679-685
35. Haynes J.D., et al. Reading hidden intentions in the human brain. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) 323-328
36. Haynes J.D., and Rees G. Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 686-691
37. Davatzikos C., et al. Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: application to lie detection. Neuroimage 28 (2005) 663-668
38. Spence S.A., et al. A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359 (2004) 1755-1762
39. Kilner J.M., et al. The mirror system: a Bayesian perspective. Neuroreport 18 (2007) 619-623
40. Mobbs D., et al. Law, responsibility and the brain. PLoS Biol. 5 (2007) e103
41. Roepstorff A., and Frith C. What's at the top in the top-down control of action? Script-sharing and 'top-top' control of action in cognitive experiments. Psychol. Res. 68 (2004) 189-198
42. Roepstorff A. Brains in scanners: an Umwelt of cognitive neuroscience. Semiotica 134 (2001) 747-765
43. Blair R.J., et al. The psychopathic individual: a lack of responsiveness to distress cues?. Psychophysiology 34 (1997) 192-198
44. Ben-Shakhar G., and Elaad E. The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: a meta-analytic review. J. Appl. Psychol. 88 (2003) 131-151
45. Henson R.N.A., and Rugg M.D. Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 263-270
46. Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360 (2005) 815-836
47. Galasinski D. The Language of Deception. A Discourse Analytical Study (2000), Sage
48. Levinson S.C. Pragmatics (1983), Cambridge University Press
49. Spence S.A., et al. Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport 12 (2001) 2849-2853
50. Abe N., et al. Dissociable roles of prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices in deception. Cereb. Cortex 16 (2006) 192-199
51. Lee T.M., et al. Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15 (2002) 157-164
52. Lee T.M., et al. Neural correlates of feigned memory impairment. Neuroimage 28 (2005) 305-313
53. Kozel F.A., et al. Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biol. Psychiatry 58 (2005) 605-613
54. Mohamed F.B., et al. Brain mapping of deception and truth telling about an ecologically valid situation: functional MR imaging and polygraph investigation - initial experience. Radiology 238 (2006) 679-688