Novel adaptation to hawkmoth pollinators in Clarkia reduces efficiency, not attraction of diurnal visitors

Annals of Botany

Volumn 113, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 317-329

  Miller, Timothy J ^a   Raguso, Robert A ^b   Kay, Kathleen M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Clarkia breweri; Clarkia concinna; floral traits; Hyles lineata; parapatric divergence; pollinator effectiveness; pollinator efficiency; pollinator shift; speciation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANNUAL PLANT; BIRD; FLORAL TRAIT; FLOWER VISITING; MOTH; PARAPATRY; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ADAPTATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLARKIA; CLARKIA BREWERI; CLARKIA CONCINNA; DARKNESS; FLORAL TRAITS; FLOWER; GEOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; HYLES LINEATA; MOTH; PARAPATRIC DIVERGENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; POLLINATION; POLLINATOR EFFECTIVENESS; POLLINATOR EFFICIENCY; POLLINATOR SHIFT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; UNITED STATES;

CLARKIA BREWERI; CLARKIA CONCINNA; FLORAL TRAITS; HYLES LINEATA; PARAPATRIC DIVERGENCE; POLLINATOR EFFECTIVENESS; POLLINATOR EFFICIENCY; POLLINATOR SHIFT; SPECIATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CALIFORNIA; CLARKIA; DARKNESS; FLOWERS; GEOGRAPHY; MOTHS; POLLEN; POLLINATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 84892707066     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct237     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. AignerPA. 2001. Optimality modeling and fitness trade-offs:whenshould plants become pollinator specialists? Oikos 95: 177-184.
2. AignerPA. 2004. Floral specialization without trade-offs: optimal corolla flare in contrasting pollination environments. Ecology 85: 2560-2569.
3. Aigner PA. 2005. Variation in pollination performance gradients in a Dudleya species complex: can generalization promote floral divergence? Functional Ecology 19: 681-689.
4. Aigner PA, Scott PE. 2002. Use and pollination of a hawkmoth plant, Nicotiana attenuata, by migrant hummingbirds. Southwestern Naturalist 47: 1-11.
5. Anderson B, Johnson SD. 2008. The geographical mosaic of coevolution in a plant pollinator mutualism. Evolution 62: 220-225.
6. Anderson B, Alexandersson R, Johnson SD. 2010. Evolution and coexistence of pollination ecotypes in an African Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Evolution 64: 960-972.
7. Armbruster WS, Edwards ME, Debevec EM. 1994. Floral character displacement generates assemblage structure of Western-Australian triggerplants (Stylidium). Ecology 75: 315-329.
8. Baker HG. 1959. Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants. Cold Spring Harbour Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24: 177-191.
9. Beattie AJ. 1971. A technique for the study of insect-borne pollen. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 47: 82.
10. Botes C, Johnson SD, Cowling RM. 2009. The birds and the bees: using selective exclusion to identify effective pollinators of African tree aloes. International Journal of Plant Science 170: 151-156.
11. Bradshaw HD, Schemske DW. 2003. Allele substitution at flower colour locus produces a pollinator sfit in monkeyflowers. Nature 426: 176-178.
12. Bradshaw HD, Otto KG, Frewen BE, McKay JK, Schemske DW. 1998. Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). Genetics 149: 367-382.
13. Campbell DR,Waser NM, Melendez-Ackerman EJ. 1997. Analyzing pollinator mediated selection in a plant hybrid zone: hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales. American Naturalist. 149: 295-315.
14. Castellanos MC, Wilson P, Thomson JD. 2004. 'Anti-bee' and 'pro-bird' changes during the evolution of hummingbird pollination in Penstemon flowers. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 876-885.
15. ChacoffNP,Garcia D,ObesoJR. 2008. Effects of pollen qualityand quantityon pollen limitation in Crataegus monogyna (Rosaceae) in NW Spain. Flora 203: 499-507.
16. Dell'Olivo A, Kuhlemeler C. 2013. Asymmetric effects of loss and gain of a floral trait on pollinator preference. Evolution 67: 3023-3031.
17. Dilley JD,Wilson P, MeslerMR.2000. The radiation of Calochortus: generalist flowers moving through a mosaic of potential pollinators. Oikos 89: 209-222.
18. Eckert CG. 2002. Effect of geographical variation in pollinator fauna on the mating system of Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 123-132.
19. Fenster CB, Armbuster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thompson JD. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 375-403.
20. FrickWF, Price RD,HeadyPAIII,KayKM.2013. Insectivorous bat pollinates columnar cactus more effectively per visit than specialized nectar bat. American Naturalist 181: 137-144.
21. Fulton M, Hodges SA. 1999. Floral isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 266: 2247-2254.
22. Fumero-Caban JJ, Melendez-AckermanEJ. 2007.Relative pollination effectiveness of floral visitors of Pitcairnia angustifolia (Bromeliaceae). American Journal of Botany 94: 419-424.
23. Galen C, Kaczorowski R, Todd SL, Geib J, Raguso RA. 2011. Dosage-dependent impacts of a floral volatile on pollinators, larcenists and the potential for floral evolution in the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. The American Naturalist 177: 258-272.
24. Gottlieb LD, Weeden NF. 1979. Gene duplication and phylogeny in Clarkia. Evolution 33: 1024-1039.
25. Goyret J, Markwell PM, Raguso RA. 2007. The effect of olfactory and visual stimuli decoupling on the foraging behavior of Manduca sexta. Journal of Experimental Biology 210: 1398-1405.
26. Goyret J, Kelber A, Pfaff M. 2009. Flexible responses to visual and olfactory stimuli by foraging Manduca sexta: larval nutrition affects adult behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 276: 2739-2745.
27. Grant V. 1949. Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms. Evolution 3: 82-97.
28. Grant V. 1994. Mechanical and ethological isolation between Pedicularis groelandica and P. attallens (Scrophulariaceae). Biologisches Zentralblatt 113: 43-51.
29. Grant V, Grant KA. 1965. Flower Pollination in the Phlox Family. New York: Columbia University Press.
30. Groom MJ. 1998. Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. American Naturalist 151: 487-496.
31. Harder LD, Barrett SCH, eds. 2007. The ecology and evolution of flowers. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Herrera CM. 1987.Components of pollinator 'quality': comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50: 79-90.
33. Herrera CM. 2008. Variation in mutualisms: the spatio-temporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 35: 95-125.
34. Hersch EI, Roy BA. 2007. Context dependent pollinator behavior: an explanation for patterns of hybridization among three species of indian paintbrush. Evolution 61: 111-124.
35. Hirota SK, Nitta K,KimY, et al. 2012.Relative role of flower color and scent on pollinator attraction: experimental test using F1 and F2 hybrids of daylily and nightlily. PLoS ONE 7: e39010.
36. Hoballah ME,Gü bitzT, Stuurman J, et al. 2007. Single gene mediated shift in pollinator attraction in Petunia. The Plant Cell 19: 779-790.
37. Inouye DW, Gill DE, Dudash MR, Fenster CB. 1994. A model and lexicon for pollen fate. American Journal of Botany 81: 1517-1530.
38. Johnson SD. 1997. Pollination ecotypes of Satyrium hallackii (Orchidaceae) in South Africa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 123: 225-235.
39. Johnson SD, Steiner KE. 1997. Long-tongued fly pollination and evolution of floral spur length in the Disa draconis complex (Orchidaceae). Evolution 51: 45-53.
40. Johnson SD, Hargreaves AL, BrownM. 2006. Dark, bitter-tasting nectar functions as a filter of flower visitors in a bird-pollinated plant. Ecology 87: 2709-2716.
41. Kaczorowski RL, Seliger AR, Gaskett AC, Wigsten SK, Raguso RA. 2012. Corolla shape vs. size in flower choice by a nocturnal hawkmoth pollinator. Functional Ecology 26: 577-587.
42. Kay KM, Picklum DA. 2013. Drought alters the expression of mating system traits in two species of Clarkia. Evolutionary Ecology 27: online early, doi:10.1007/s10682-013-9630-6
43. Kay KM, Sargent RD. 2009. The role of animal pollination in plant speciation: Integrating ecology, geography, and genetics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 40: 637-656.
44. Kay KM, Schemske DW. 2003. Pollinator assemblages and visitation rates for 11 species of neotropical Costus (Costaceae). Biotropica 35: 198-207.
45. Kay KM, Schemske DW. 2008. Natural selection reinforces speciation in a radiation of neotropical rainforest plants. Evolution 62: 2628-2642.
46. Kay KM, Voelckel C, Yang JY, Hufford KM, Kaska DD, Hodges SA. 2006. Floral characters and species diversification. In: Harder LD, Barrett SCH, eds. Ecology and evolution of flowers. New York: Oxford University Press, 311-325.
47. Kearns CA, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Press.
48. Kessler D, Baldwin IT. 2011. Back to the past for pollination biology. Current Opinion in Pollination Biology 14: 429-434.
49. Klahre U, Gurba A, Hermann K, et al. 2011. Pollinator choice in Petunia depends on two major genetic loci for floral scent production. Current Biology 21: 730-739.
50. Kulbaba MW, Worley AC. 2008. Floral design in Polemonium brandegei (Polemoniaceae): genetic and phenotypic variation under hawkmoth and hummingbird pollination. International Journal of Plant Science 169: 509-522.
51. Lau JA, Galloway LF. 2004. Effects of low-efficiency pollinators on plant fitness and floral trait evolution in Campanula americana (Campanulaceae). Oecologia 141: 577-583.
52. Lewis H, Lewis ME. 1955. The genus Clarkia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53. MacSwain J, Raven PH, Thorp R. 1973. Comparative behavior of bees and Onagraceae. IV. Clarkia bees of the western United States. University of California Publications in Entomology 70: 1-80.
54. Madjidian JA, Morales CL, Smith HG. 2008. Displacement of a native by an alien bumblebee: lower pollinator efficiency overcome by higher visitation frequency. Oecologia 156: 835-845.
55. MayfieldMM,Waser NM, PriceMV. 2001. Exploring the 'Most effective pollinator principle' with complex flowers: bumblebees and Ipomopsis aggregata. Annals of Botany 88: 591-596.
56. Miller RB. 1981. Hawkmoths and the geographic patterns of floral variation in Aquilegia caerulea. Evolution 35: 763-774.
57. Moeller DA. 2004. Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology 85: 3289-3301.
58. Moeller DA. 2005. Pollinator community structure and sources of spatial variation in plant-pollinator interaction in Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana. Oecologia 142: 28-37.
59. MuchhalaN. 2007. Adaptive trade-off in floral morphology mediates specialization for flowers pollinated by bats and hummingbirds. American Naturalist 169: 494-504.
60. Ne'eman G, Jürgens A, Newstrom-Lloyd L, Potts S, Dafni A. 2010. A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency. Biological Reviews 85: 435-451.
61. Newman E, Anderson B, Johnson SD. 2012. Flower colour adaptation in a mimetic orchid. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 279: 2309-2313.
62. Perez-Barrales R, Arroyo J, Armbruster WS. 2007. Differences in pollinator faunas may generate geographic differences in floral morphology and integration in Narcissus papyraceus (Alarcissio papyraceris). Oikos 116: 1904-1918.
63. Petanidou T, Kallimanis AS, Tzanopoulos J, Sgardelis SP, Pantis JD. 2008. Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecology Letters 11: 564-575.
64. Pichersky E, Raguso RA, Lewinsohn E, Croteau R. 1994. Floral scent production in Clarkia (Onagraceae). I. Localization and developmental modulation of monoterpene emission and linalool synthase activity. Plant Physiology 106: 1533-1540.
65. Price MV, Waser NM, Irwin RE, Campbell DR. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study. Ecology 86: 2106-2116.
66. Raguso RA. 1995. Mechanisms of floral scent production and hawkmoth pollination in Clarkia breweri (Onagraceae). PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
67. Raguso RA, Pichersky E. 1995. Floral volatiles from Clarkia breweri, and C. concinna (Onagraceae): recent evolution of floral scent and moth pollination. Plant Systematics and Evolution 194: 55-67.
68. Raguso RA, Willis MA. 2002. Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naïve hawkmoths. Animal Behaviour 64: 685-695.
69. Raguso RA, Willis MA. 2003. Hawkmoth pollination in Arizona's Sonoran Desert: behavioral responses to floral traits. In: Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR, eds. Evolution and ecology taking flight: butterflies as model systems. Rocky Mountain Biological Lab Symposium Series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 43-65.
70. Raguso RA, Willis MA. 2005. Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by wild hawkmoths. Animal Behaviour 65: 407-418.
71. Raguso RA, Light DM, Pichersky E. 1996. Electroantennogram responses of Hyles lineata (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera) to floral volatile compounds from Clarkia breweri (Onagraceae) and other moth-pollinated flowers. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22: 1735-1766.
72. Raguso RA, Henzel C, Buchmann SL, Nabhan GP. 2003. Trumpet flowers of the Sonoran Desert: floral biology of Peniocereus cacti and sacred datura. International Journal of Plant Biology 164: 877-892.
73. Ramsey M, Vaughton G. 2000. Pollen quality limits seed set in Burchardia umbellata (Colchicaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 845-852.
74. Rausher MD. 2008. Evolutionary transitions in floral color. International Journal of Plant Science 169: 7-21.
75. Sargent RD, Otto SP. 2006. The role of local species abundance in the evolution of pollinator attraction in flowering plants. AmericanNaturalist 167: 67-80.
76. SchemskeDW, BradshawHD. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96: 11910-11915.
77. SchemskeDW, Horvitz CC. 1984.Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability-a precondition for mutualism specialization. Science 225: 519-521.
78. Schlumpberger BO, Raguso RA. 2008. Geographic variation in floral scent of Echinopsis ancistrophora (Cactaceae); evidence for constraints on hawkmoth attraction. Oikos 117: 801-814.
79. Sime K, Baldwin I. 2003. Opportunistic out-crossing in Nicotiana attenuata (Solanaceae), a predominantly self-fertilizing native tobacco. BMC Ecology 3: 6.
80. Smith SD, Hall SJ, Izquierdo PR, Baum DA. 2008. Comparative pollination biology of sympatric and allopatric Andean Iochroma (Solanaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 95: 600-617.
81. Stebbins GL. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms I: Pollination mechanisms. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 307-326.
82. Streisfeld MA, Kohn JR. 2007. Environment and pollinator-mediated selection on parapatric floral races of Mimulus aurantiacus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 122-132.
83. Sytsma KJ, Smith JF, Gottlieb LD. 1990. Phylogenetics in Clarkia (Onagraceae): restriction site mapping of chloroplast DNA. Systematic Botany 15: 280-295.
84. Theis NB, Lerdau M, Raguso RA. 2007. The challenge of attracting pollinators while evading floral herbivores: patterns of fragrance emission in Cirsium arvense and Cirsium repandum (Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Science 168: 587-601.
85. Thomson JD. 2003. When is it mutualism? (An American Society of Naturalists Presidential Address). American Naturalist 162: S1-9.
86. Thomson JD,Wilson P. 2008. Explaining evolutionary shifts between bee and hummingbird pollination: convergence, divergence, and directionality. International Journal of Plant Science 169: 23-38.
87. Venail J, Dell'Olivo A, Kuhlemeier C. 2010. Speciation genes in the genus Petunia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365: 461-468.
88. Waser NM. 2001. Pollinator behavior and plant speciation: looking beyond the 'ethological isolation' paradigm. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD, eds. Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behavior and floral evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 318-336.