Harnessing the complexity of metabolomic data with chemometrics

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-9

  Boccard, Julien ^a   Rudaz, Serge ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Chemometrics; Data integration; Data structure; Dimensionality reduction; Metabolomics

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

CHEMICAL DIVERSITY; CHEMOMETRICES; COMPLEX SAMPLES; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; DYNAMIC INFORMATION; LIFE-SCIENCES; METABOLOMICS; METABOLOMICS DATA; RESEARCH FIELDS; TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES;

DATA INTEGRATION;

EID: 84892674763     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.2567     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Fiehn O. Metabolomics-the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002; 48(1-2): 155-171.
2. Glauser G, Guillarme D, Grata E, Boccard J, Thiocone A, Carrupt P-A, Veuthey J-L, Rudaz S, Wolfender J-L. Optimized liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry approach for the isolation of minor stress biomarkers in plant extracts and their identification by capillary nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Chromatogr. A 2008; 1180(1-2): 90-98.
3. Saito K, Matsuda F. Metabolomics for functional genomics, systems biology, and biotechnology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010; 61: 463-489.
4. Colquhoun IJ. Use of NMR for metabolic profiling in plant systems. J. Pestic. Sci. 2007; 32(3): 200-212.
5. Wishart DS. Quantitative metabolomics using NMR. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2008; 27(3): 228-237.
6. Webb AG. Microcoil nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2005; 38(5): 892-903.
7. Kim HK, Choi YH, Verpoorte R. NMR-based metabolomic analysis of plants. Nat. Protoc. 2010; 5(3): 536-549.
8. Verpoorte R, Choi Y, Kim H. NMR-based metabolomics at work in phytochemistry. Phytochem Rev 2007; 6(1): 3-14.
9. Williams R, Lenz EM, Wilson AJ, Granger J, Wilson ID, Major H, Stumpf C, Plumb R. A multi-analytical platform approach to the metabonomic analysis of plasma from normal and Zucker (fa/fa) obese rats. Mol. Biosyst. 2006; 2(3-4): 174-183.
10. Lu W, Bennett BD, Rabinowitz JD. Analytical strategies for LC-MS based targeted metabolomics. J. Chromatogr. B 2008; 871(2): 236-242.
11. Büscher JM, Czernik D, Ewald JC, Sauer U, Zamboni N. Cross-platform comparison of methods for quantitative metabolomics of primary metabolism. Anal. Chem. 2009; 81(6): 2135-2143.
12. Steuer R. On the analysis and interpretation of correlations in metabolomic data. Brief. Bioinform. 2006; 7(2): 151-158.
13. Boccard J, Veuthey JL, Rudaz S. Knowledge discovery in metabolomics: an overview of MS data handling. J. Sep. Sci. 2010; 33(3): 290-304.
14. Westerhuis JA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Smit S, Vis DJ, Smilde AK, van Velzen EJJ, van Duijnhoven JPM, van Dorsten FA. Assessment of PLSDA cross validation. Metabolomics 2008; 4(1): 81-89.
15. Esbensen KH, Geladi P. Principles of proper validation: use and abuse of re-sampling for validation. J. Chemometr. 2010; 24(3-4): 168-187.
16. Szymańska E, Saccenti E, Smilde AK, Westerhuis JA. Double-check: validation of diagnostic statistics for PLS-DA models in metabolomics studies. Metabolomics 2012; 8(1): S3-S16.
17. Mehmood T, Liland KH, Snipen L, Sæbø S. A review of variable selection methods in partial least squares regression. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2012; 118: 62-69.
18. Guyon I, Elisseeff A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003; 3: 1157-1182.
19. Boccard J, Badoud F, Grata E, Ouertani S, Hanafi M, Mazerolles G, Lantéri P, Veuthey J-L, Saugy M, Rudaz S. A steroidomic approach for biomarkers discovery in doping control. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011; 213(1-3): 85-94.
20. Kankainen M, Gopalacharyulu P, Holm L, Orešič M. MPEA-metabolite pathway enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics 2011; 27(13): 1878-1879.
21. Hendrickx DM, Hoefsloot HCJ, Hendriks MMWB, Canelas AB, Smilde AK. Global test for metabolic pathway differences between conditions. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012; 719: 8-15.
22. Liland KH. Multivariate methods in metabolomics-from pre-processing to dimension reduction and statistical analysis. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2011; 30(6): 827-841.
23. Ni Y, Su M, Qiu Y, Chen M, Liu Y, Zhao A, Jia W. Metabolic profiling using combined GC-MS and LC-MS provides a systems understanding of aristolochic acid-induced nephrotoxicity in rat. FEBS Lett. 2007; 581(4): 707-711.
24. Steinmetz V, Crochon M, Bellon Maurel V, Garcia Fernandez JL, Barreiro Elorza P, Verstreken L. Sensors for fruit firmness assessment: comparison and fusion. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1996; 64(1): 15-27.
25. Saito K, Hirai MY, Yonekura-Sakakibara K. Decoding genes with coexpression networks and metabolomics-'majority report by precogs'. Trends Plant Sci. 2008; 13(1): 36-43.
26. Noda I. Generalized 2-dimensional correlation method applicable to infrared, Raman, and other types of spectroscopy. Appl. Spectrosc. 1993; 47(9): 1329-1336.
27. Crockford DJ, Holmes E, Lindon JC, Plumb RS, Zirah S, Bruce SJ, Rainville P, Stumpf CL, Nicholson JK. Statistical heterospectroscopy, an approach to the integrated analysis of NMR and UPLC-MS data sets: application in metabonomic toxicology studies. Anal. Chem. 2006; 78(2): 363-371.
28. Jones OAH, Maguire ML, Griffin JL, Jung Y-H, Shibato J, Rakwal R, Agrawal GK, Jwa N-S. Using metabolic profiling to assess plant-pathogen interactions: an example using rice (Oryza sativa) and the blast pathogen Magnaporthe grisea. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011; 129(4): 539-554.
29. Xu J, Cai S, Li X, Donga J, Dinga J, Chen Z. Statistical two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy of urine and serum from metabolomics data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2012; 112: 33-40.
30. Doeswijk TG, Smilde AK, Hageman JA, Westerhuis JA, van Eeuwijk FA. On the increase of predictive performance with high-level data fusion. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011; 705(1-2): 41-47.
31. Blanchet L, Smolinska A, Attali A, Stoop MP, Ampt KAM, van Aken H, Suidgeest E, Tuinstra T, Wijmenga SS, Luider T, Buydens LMC. Fusion of metabolomics and proteomics data for biomarkers discovery: case study on the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. BMC Bioinf. 2011; 12: 254-265.
32. Tikunov YM, de Vos RCH, González Paramás AM, Hall RD, Bovy AG. A role for differential glycoconjugation in the emission of phenylpropanoid volatiles from tomato fruit discovered using a metabolic data fusion approach. Plant Physiol. 2010; 152(1): 55-70.
33. Roussel S, Bellon-Maurel V, Roger J-M, Grenier P. Authenticating white grape must variety with classification models based on aroma sensors, FT-IR and UV spectrometry. J. Food Eng. 2003; 60(4): 407-419.
34. Biais B, Allwood JW, Deborde C, Xu Y, Maucourt M, Beauvoit B, Dunn WB, Jacob D, Goodacre R, Rolin D, Moing A. H-1 NMR, GC-EI-TOFMS, and data set correlation for fruit metabolomics: application to spatial metabolite analysis in melon. Anal. Chem. 2009; 81(8): 2884-2894.
35. Brereton RG. Consequences of sample size, variable selection, and model validation and optimisation, for predicting classification ability from analytical data. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2006; 25(11): 1103-1111.
36. Steinmetz V, Sevila F, Bellon-Maurel V. A methodology for sensor fusion design: application to fruit quality assessment. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1999; 74(1): 21-31.
37. Yu S, Tranchevent L-C, De Moor B, Moreau Y. Kernel-Based Data Fusion for Machine Learning. Studies in Computational Intelligence: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.
38. Smolinska A, Blanchet L, Coulier L, Ampt KAM, Luider T, Hintzen RQ, Wijmenga SS, Buydens LMC. Interpretation and visualization of non-linear data fusion in kernel space: study on metabolomic characterization of progression of multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2012; 7(6).
39. Van Mechelen I, Smilde AK. A generic linked-mode decomposition model for data fusion. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2010; 104(1): 83-94.
40. Smilde AK, Westerhuis JA, de Jong S. A framework for sequential multiblock component methods. J. Chemometr. 2003; 17(6): 323-337.
41. Wold S, Hellberg S, Lundstedt T, Sjöström M, Wold H. PLS modeling with latent variables in two or more dimensions. In PLS-Meeting. Germany: Symposium Frankfurt am Main, 1987.
42. Wold S, Kettaneh N, Tjessem K. Hierarchical multiblock PLS and PC models for easier model interpretation and as an alternative to variable selection. J. Chemometr. 1996; 10(5-6): 463-482.
43. Qin SJ, Valle S, Piovoso MJ. On unifying multiblock analysis with application to decentralized process monitoring. J. Chemometr. 2001; 15(9): 715-742.
44. Escofier B, Pages J. Multiple factor-analysis (AFMULT package). Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 1994; 18(1): 121-140.
45. Mazerollesa G, Hanafi M, Dufour E, Bertrand D, Qannari EM. Common components and specific weights analysis: a chemometric method for dealing with complexity of food products. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2006; 81(1): 41-49.
46. Hanafi M, Mazerolles G, Dufour E, Qannari EM. Common components and specific weight analysis and multiple co-inertia analysis applied to the coupling of several measurement techniques. J. Chemometr. 2006; 20(5): 172-183.
47. Löfstedt T, Trygg J. OnPLS-a novel multiblock method for the modelling of predictive and orthogonal variation. J. Chemometr. 2011; 25(8): 441-455.
48. Tenenhaus M, Hanafi M. A bridge between PLS path modeling and multi-block data analysis. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2010; 99-123.
49. Tenenhaus A, Tenenhaus M. Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 2011; 76(2): 257-284.
50. Bougeard S, Qannari EM, Lupo C, Hanafi M. From multiblock partial least squares to multiblock redundancy analysis. A continuum approach. Informatica 2011; 22(1): 11-26.
51. Westerhuis JA, Coenegracht PMJ. Multivariate modelling of the pharmaceutical two-step process of wet granulation and tableting with multiblock partial least squares. J. Chemometr. 1997; 11(5): 379-392.
52. Kohonen J, Reinikainen S-P, Aaljoki K, Perkiö A, Väänänen T, Höskuldsson A. Multi-block methods in multivariate process control. J. Chemometr. 2008; 22(11-12): 580-586.
53. Tenenhaus M, Esposito Vinzi V, Chatelin Y-M, Lauro C. PLS path modeling. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2005; 48(1): 159-205.
54. Boccard J, Rutledge DN. A consensus orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) strategy for multiblock omics data fusion. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013; 769(0): 30-39.
55. Bylesjö M, Eriksson D, Kusano M, Moritz T, Trygg J. Data integration in plant biology: the O2PLS method for combined modeling of transcript and metabolite data. Plant J. 2007; 52(6): 1181-1191.
56. Næs T, Tomic O, Mevik B-H, Martens H. Path modelling by sequential PLS regression. J. Chemometr. 2011; 25(1): 28-40.
57. Smilde AK, Westerhuis JA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Bijlsma S, Rubingh CM, Vis DJ, Jellema RH, Pijl H, Roelfsema F, van der Greef J. Dynamic metabolomic data analysis: a tutorial review. Metabolomics 2010; 6(1): 3-17.
58. Jansen JJ, Hoefsloot HCJ, Boelens HFM, van der Greef J, Smilde AK. Analysis of longitudinal metabolomics data. Bioinformatics 2004; 20(15): 2438-2446.
59. Smilde AK, Jansen JJ, Hoefsloot HCJ, Lamers R-JAN, van der Greef J, Timmerman ME. ANOVA-simultaneous component analysis (ASCA): a new tool for analyzing designed metabolomics data. Bioinformatics 2005; 21(13): 3043-3048.
60. Verouden MPH, Westerhuis JA, van der Werf MJ, Smilde AK. Exploring the analysis of structured metabolomics data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2009; 98(1): 88-96.
61. Harrington PDB, Vieira NE, Espinoza J, Nien JK, Romero R, Yergey AL. Analysis of variance-principal component analysis: a soft tool for proteomic discovery. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005; 544(1-2): 118-127.
62. Keun HC, Ebbels TMD, Bollard ME, Beckonert O, Antti H, Holmes E, Lindon JC, Nicholson JK. Geometric trajectory analysis of metabolic responses to toxicity can define treatment specific profiles. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2004; 17(5): 579-587.
63. Van den Brink PJ, Ter Braak CJF. Principal response curves: analysis of time-dependent multivariate responses of biological community to stress. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1999; 18(2): 138-148.
64. Smilde AK, Timmerman ME, Hendriks MMWB, Jansen JJ, Hoefsloot HCJ. Generic framework for high-dimensional fixed-effects ANOVA. Brief. Bioinform. 2012; 13(5): 524-535.
65. Wold S, Kettaneh N, Fridén H, Holmberg A. Modelling and diagnostics of batch processes and analogous kinetic experiments. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998; 44(1-2): 331-340.
66. Timmerman ME, Kiers HAL. Four simultaneous component models for the analysis of multivariate time series from more than one subject to model intraindividual and interindividual differences. Psychometrika 2003; 68(1): 105-121.
67. Rantalainen M, Cloarec O, Ebbels TMD, Lundstedt T, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Trygg J. Piecewise multivariate modelling of sequential metabolic profiling data. BMC Bioinfo. 2008. 9.
68. Signoretto M, De Lathauwer L, Suykens JAK. A kernel-based framework to tensorial data analysis. Neural Netw. 2011; 24(8): 861-874.
69. Harshman RA, Lundy ME. PARAFAC-parallel factor-analysis. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 1994; 18(1): 39-72.
70. Tucker LR. Some mathematical notes on 3-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 1966; 31(3): 279-279.
71. Bro R. Multiway calibration. Multilinear PLS. J. Chemom. 1996; 10(1): 47-61.
72. Khoromskij BN. Tensors-structured numerical methods in scientific computing: survey on recent advances. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2012; 110(1): 1-19.
73. Rubingh CM, Bijlsma S, Jellema RH, Overkamp KM, van der Werf MJ, Smilde AK. Analyzing longitudinal microbial metabolomics data. J. Proteome Res. 2009; 8(9): 4319-4327.