Phylogenetic imputation of plant functional trait databases

Ecography

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 105-110

  Swenson, Nathan G ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATABASE; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; FUNCTIONAL CHANGE; PHYLOGENETICS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 84892672155     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00528.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baker T. R. et al. 2004. Variation in wood density determines spatial patterns in Amazonian forest biomass. Global Change Biol. 10: 545-562.
2. Baker T. R. et al. 2009. Do species traits determine patterns of wood production in Amazonian forests? Biogeosciences 6: 297-307.
3. Baraloto C. et al. 2010. Decoupled leaf and stem economics in rain forest trees. Ecol. Lett. 13: 1338-1347.
4. Beaulieu J. M. et al. 2012. Synthesizing phylogenetic knowledge for ecological research. Ecology 93: S4-S13.
5. Blomberg S. P. et al. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717-745.
6. Bruggeman J. 2011. A phylogenetic approach to the estimation of phytoplankton traits. J. Phycol. 47: 52-65.
7. Bruggeman J. et al. 2009. PhyloPars: estimation of missing parameter values using phylogeny. Nucl. Acids. Res. 37: W179-W184.
8. Cavender-Bares J. et al. 2009. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol. Lett. 12: 693-715.
9. Chave J. et al. 2009. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol. Lett. 12: 351-366.
10. Diaz S. and Cabido M. 2001. Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 646-655.
11. Diniz-Filho J. A. F. et al. 1998. An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52: 1247-1262.
12. Donoghue M. J. 2008. A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 11549-11555.
13. Edwards E. J. et al. 2007. The relevance of phylogeny to studies of global climate change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 243-249.
14. Elser J. J. et al. 2010. Biological stoichiometry of plant production: metabolism, scaling, and ecological response to global change. New Phytol. 186: 593-608.
15. Evans M. E. K. et al. 2009. Climate, niche evolution, and diversification of the "bird-cage" evening primroses (Oenothera, Sections Anogra and Kleinia). Am. Nat. 173: 225-240.
16. Felsenstein J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
17. Freckleton R. P. et al. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of compara tive data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160: 712-726.
18. Freckleton R. P. et al. 2011. Comparative methods as a statistical fix: the dangers of ignoring an evolutionary model. Am. Nat. 178: E10-E17.
19. Frontier S. 1976. Etude de la decroissance des valeurs propres dans une analyse en composantes principales: comparaison avec le modele du baton brise. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 25: 67-75.
20. Garland T. Jr and Ives A. R. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155: 346-364.
21. Gilbert G. S. et al. 2012. Evolutionary tools for phytosanitary risk analysis: phylogenetic signal as a predictor of host range of plant pests and pathogens. Evol. Appl. 5: 869-878.
22. Ives A. R. et al. 2007. Within-species measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst. Biol. 56: 252-270.
23. Kattge J. et al. 2011. TRY - a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biol. 17: 2905-2935.
24. Kuhn I. et al. 2009. Combining spatial and phylogenetic eigenvector filtering in trait analysis. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 18: 745-758.
25. Legendre P. and Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology, 2nd English ed. - Elsevier.
26. Martins E. P. and Hansen T. F. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149: 646-667.
27. Moles A. T. et al. 2005. A brief history of seed size. Science 307: 576-580.
28. Moorcroft P. R. 2006. How close are we to a predictive science of the biosphere? Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 400-407.
29. Purves D. W. and Pacala S. W. 2008. Predictive models of forest dynamics. Science 320: 1452-1453.
30. Reich P. B. 2005. Global biogeography of plant chemistry: filling in the blanks. New Phytol. 168: 263-268.
31. Rohlf F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55: 2143-2160.
32. Rubin D. B. 1987. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. - Wiley.
33. Rubin D. B. 1996. Multiple imputation after 18 + years. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 94: 473-489.
34. Shan H. et al. 2012. Gap filling in the plant kingdom - trait prediction using hierarchical probabilistic matrix factorization. - Proceedings on the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning.
35. Smith S. A. et al. 2009. Mega-phylogeny approach for compara tive biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches. BMC Evol. Biol. 9: 37.
36. Swenson N. G. 2011. The role of evolutionary processes in producing biodiversity patterns, and the interrelationships between taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic biodiversity. Am. J. Bot. 98: 472-480.
37. Swenson N. G. and Weiser M. D. 2010. Plant geography upon the basis of functional traits: an example from eastern North America. Ecology 91: 2234-2241.
38. Swenson N. G. et al. 2012. The biogeography and filtering of woody plant functional diversity in North and South America. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 21: 798-808.
39. ter steege H. et al. 2006. Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia. Nature 443: 444-447.
40. Tilman D. et al. 1997. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277: 1300-1302.
41. Webb C. O. and Donoghue M. J. 2005. Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol. Ecol. Not. 5: 181-183.
42. Westoby M. and Wright I. J. 2006. Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 261-268.