Visitors and Residents: mapping student attitudes to academic use of social networks

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 126-141

  Wright, Fiona ^a   White, David ^b   Hirst, Tony ^c   Cann, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

data visualization; higher education; peer education; social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892483190     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2013.777077     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alexander, B. (2008). Social Networking in Higher Education. In The Tower and the Cloud: Higher Education in the Age of Cloud Computing, edited by R. N. Katz, 197-201. Berkeley, CA/Washington, DC: Campanile, University of California/EDUCAUSE.
2. Badge, J. L., N. F. W. Saunders, and A. J. Cann (2012). Beyond Marks: New Tools to Visualise Student Engagement via Social Networks. Research in Learning Technology 20, 16283. http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/16283/html doi: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16283
3. Baran, B. (2010). Facebook as a Formal Instructional Environment. British Journal of Educational Technology 41(6), E146-E149. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01115.x
4. Blondel, V. D., J. L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008, P10008 doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
5. Brown, J. S. (2008). How to Connect Technology and Content in the Service of Learning. Chronicle of Higher Education 55(8),. http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i08/08a12001.htm
6. Cann, A. J., and J. Badge (2011). Reflective Social Portfolios for Feedback and Peer Mentoring. Leicester Research Archive, http://hdl.handle.net/2381/9704
7. Connaway, L. S., D. White, and Lanclos, D (2011). Visitors and Residents: What Motivates Engagement with the Digital Information Environment?. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 48(1), 1-7. doi: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801129
8. Cormode, G., and B. Krishnamurthy (2008). Key Differences Between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday 13(6),. www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125/1972 doi: 10.5210/fm.v13i6.2125
9. Dawson, S. (2010). Seeing the Learning Community: An Exploration of the Development of a Resource for Monitoring Online Student Networking. British Journal of Educational Technology 41, 736-752. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00970.x
10. De Laat, M., V. Lally, L. Lipponen, and R. J. Simons (2006). Analysing Student Engagement with Learning and Tutoring Activities in Networked Learning Communities: A Multi-method Approach. International Journal of Web Based Communities 2(4), 394-412. doi: 10.1504/IJWBC.2006.011766
11. Gray, K., J. Waycott, R. Clerehan, M. Hamilton, J. Richardson, J. Shearde, and C. Thompson (2012). Worth it? Findings from a Study of how Academics Assess Students' Web 2.0 Activities. Research in Learning Technology 20, 16153. http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/16153 doi: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16153
12. Hamilton, J., and T. Singwhat (2010). Smart Utilization of Tertiary Instructional Modes. Computers and Education 54(4), 1036-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.009
13. Junco, R. (2012a). Too Much Face and not Enough Books: The Relationship between Multiple Indices of Facebook Use and Academic Performance. Computers in Human Behavior 28(1), 187-198. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026
14. Junco, R. (2012b). The Relationship between Frequency of Facebook Use, Participation in Facebook Activities, and Student Engagement. Computers and Education 58(1), 162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004
15. Junco, R., M. C. Elavsky, and G. Heiberger (2012). Putting Twitter to the Test: Assessing Outcomes for Student Collaboration, Engagement and Success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 01 March 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x/abstract
16. Krosnick, J. A., and S. Presser (2010). Question and Questionnaire Design. In Handbook of Survey Research, edited by P. V. Marsden and J. D. Wright, 2nd ed., 263-314. Bingley: Emerald.
17. Lewis, K., M. Gonzalez, and J. Kaufman (2012). Social Selection and Peer Influence in an Online Social Network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(1), 68-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109739109
18. Madge, C., J. Meek, J. Wellens, and T. Hooley (2009). Facebook, Social Integration and Informal Learning at University: It is More for Socialising and Talking to Friends about Work than for Actually Doing Work. Learning, Media and Technology 34(2), 141-155. doi: 10.1080/17439880902923606
19. Marwick, A. E., and D. Boyd (2010). I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience. New Media and Society. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313. http://nms.sagepub.com/content/13/1/114
20. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants: Do They Really Think Differently?. On the Horizon 9, 1-6.
21. R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 http://www.R-project.org
22. Ryan, J. (2010). A History of the Internet and the Digital Future. London: Reaktion Books.
23. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. White, D. S. 2011. The cost of Residency?. http://tallblog.conted.ox.ac.uk/index.php/2011/08/15/the-cost-of-residency/
25. White, D. S., and A. Le Cornu (2011). Visitors and Residents: A New Typology for Online Engagement. First Monday 16,. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3171 doi: 10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171
26. Wilkinson, T. (2011). Pass/Fail Grading: Not Everything that Counts can be Counted. Medical Education 45(9), 860-862. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04018.x