Visitors and residents: What motivates engagement with the digital information environment?

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 48, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Connaway, Lynn Silipigni ^a   White, David ^b   Lanclos, Donna ^c  

^a OCLC Research   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital information; Ethnographic methods; Evidence based decision making; High school students; Residents; Technology; Undergraduate students; Visitors

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861420913     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15508390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801129     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Asher, A., & Miller, S. (2011). The ERIAL (Ethnographic Research in Illinois Academic Libraries) Project. Retrieved from http://www.erialproject.org
2. Bartley, M., Duke, D., Gabridge, T., Gaskell, M., Hennig, N., Quirion, C., Skuce, S., Stout, A., & Duranceau, E. F. (2006). User needs assessment of information seeking activities of MIT students - spring 2006. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33456
3. st century: Learning literacies for the digital age (LLiDA Project). Glasgow: The Caledonian Academy, Glasgow Caledonian University. Retrieved from http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/llida/LLiDAReportJune2009.pdf
4. Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research [CIBER]. (2008). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future: A CIBER briefing paper. London: CIBER. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/ programmes/reppres/gg-final-keynote-11012008.pdf
5. Connaway, L. S. (2007). Mountains, valleys, and pathways: Serials users' needs and steps to meet them. Part I: Preliminary analysis of focus group and semi-structured interviews at colleges and universities. Serials Librarian 52(1/2), 223-236. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/ archive/2007/connaway-serialslibrarian.pdf
6. Connaway, L. S. (2008). Make room for the Millennials. NextSpace, 10, 18-19. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/nextspace/010/research.htm
7. Connaway, L. S., & Dickey, T. J. (2010). The digital information seeker: Report of the findings from selected OCLC, RIN, and JISC user behaviour projects. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/ reports/2010/digitalinformationseekerreport.pdf
8. Connaway, L. S., Radford, M. L., Dickey, T. J., Williams, J. D., & Confer, P. (2008). Sense-making and synchronicity: Information-seeking behaviors of Millennials and Baby Boomers. Libri, 58(2), 123-135. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/archive/2008/connaway-libri.pdf
9. Delcore, H. D., Mullooly, J., & Scroggins, M. (with Arnold, K., Franco, E., & Gaspar, J.). (2009). The library study at Fresno State. Fresno: Institute of Public Anthropology, California State University. Retrieved from http://www.csufresno. edu/anthropology/ipa/ TheLibraryStudy%28DelcoreMulloolyScroggins%29.pdf
10. Dervin, B., Connaway, L. S., & Prabha, C. (2003). Sensemaking the information confluence: The whys and hows of college and university user satisficing of information needs. Retrieved from http://imlsosuoclcproject. jcomm.ohio-state.edu
11. Foster, N. F., & Gibbons, S. (2007). Studying students: The undergraduate research project at the University of Rochester. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
12. Fister, B. (1992). The research process of undergraduate students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 18(3), 163-169.
13. Gabridge, T., Gaskell, M., & Stout, A. (2008). Information seeking through students' eyes: The MIT Photo Diary Study. College and Research Libraries, 69(6), 510-522.
14. Head, A., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2009). Lessons learned: How college students seek information in the digital age. Seattle: The Information School, University of Washington.
15. Jordan, E., & Ziebell, T. (2009). Learning in the spaces: A comparative study of the use of traditional and 'new generation' library learning spaces by various disciplinary cohorts. Queensland, Australia: The University of Queensland. Retrieved from http://www.library.uq.edu.au/about/ NextGenLearningSpacesPaper.pdf
16. Malvasi, M., Rudowsky, C., & Valencia, J. M. (2009). Library Rx: Measuring and treating library anxiety: A research study. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
17. Maybee, C. (2006). Undergraduate perceptions of information use: The basis for creating user-centered student information literacy instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1), 79-85.
18. Prabha, C., Connaway, L. S., Olszewski, L., & Jenkins, L. R. (2007). What is enough? Satisficing information needs. Journal of Documentation, 63(1), 74-89.
19. Suarez, D. (2007). What students do when they study in the library: Using ethnographic methods to observe student behavior. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 8 (3). Retrieved from http:// southernlibrarianship. icaap.org/content/v08n03/suarez-d01.html
20. Valentine, B. (2001). The legitimate effort in research papers: Student commitment versus faculty expectations. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(2), 107-115.
21. Warwick, C., Galina, I., Terras, M., Huntington, P., & Pappa, N. (2008). The master builders: LAIRAH research on good practice in the construction of digital humanities projects. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(3), 383-396. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/13810
22. White, D. (2008, July 23). Not 'natives' & 'immigrants' but 'visitors' & 'residents.' Retrieved from http://tallblog.conted.ox.ac.uk/ index.php/2008/07/23/notnatives-immigrants-but-visitors-residents
23. Witt, S., & Gearhart, R. (2003). Ethnography and information literacy: An assessment project. In E. F. Avery (Ed.), Assessing student learning outcomes for information literacy instruction in academic institutions (pp. 265-278). Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.