In-silico models of stem cell and developmental systems

Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Setty, Yaki ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; RODENTIA;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; REVIEW; STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84892189151     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17424682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1742-4682-11-1     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction. Enver T, Pera M, Peterson C, Andrews PW, Cell Stem Cell 2009 4 5 387 397 10.1016/j.stem.2009.04. 011 19427289
2. Caenorhabditis elegans germ line: a model for stem cell biology. Hubbard EJ, Dev Dyn 2007 236 12 3343 3357 10.1002/dvdy.21335 17948315
3. Model systems in stem cell biology. Robert JS, Bioessays 2004 26 9 1005 1012 10.1002/bies.20100 15351970
4. Sequences and consequences. Brenner S, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2010 365 1537 207 212 10.1098/rstb.2009.0221 20008397
5. Cells as computation. Regev A, Shapiro E, Nature 2002 419 6905 343 10.1038/419343a 12353013
6. Gene regulatory factors in pancreatic development. Jensen J, Dev Dyn 2004 229 1 176 200 10.1002/dvdy.10460 14699589
7. The cancer stem cell paradigm: a new understanding of tumor development and treatment. Ebben JD, Treisman DM, Zorniak M, Kutty RG, Clark PA, Kuo JS, Expert Opin Ther Targets 2010 14 6 621 632 10.1517/14712598.2010.485186 20426697
8. Stem cell and regenerative science applications in the development of bioengineering of renal tissue. Perin L, Giuliani S, Sedrakyan S, DAS S, De Filippo RE, Pediatr Res 2008 63 5 467 471 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181660653 18427289
9. Minireview: stem cell contribution to ovarian development, function, and disease. Tilly JL, Rueda BR, Endocrinology 2008 149 9 4307 4311 10.1210/en.2008-0458 18556344
10. Stem cell biology and drug discovery. Rubin LL, Haston KM, BMC Biol 2011 9 42 10.1186/1741-7007-9-42 21649940
11. Impact of drug discovery on stem cell biology. Zhang XZ, Li XJ, Ji HF, Zhang HY, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009 383 3 275 279 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.04. 026 19366619
12. The Caenorhabditis elegans gonad: a test tube for cell and developmental biology. Hubbard EJ, Greenstein D, Dev Dyn 2000 218 1 2 22 10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0177(200005)218:1<2::AID-DVDY2>3.0.CO;2-W 10822256
13. The challenges of in silico biology. Palsson B, Nat Biotechnol 2000 18 11 1147 1150 10.1038/81125 11062431
14. Modeling the heart-from genes to cells to the whole organ. Noble D, Science 2002 295 5560 1678 1682 10.1126/science.1069881 11872832
15. Multiscale modeling of diffusion in the early Drosophila embryo. Sample C, Shvartsman SY, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010 107 22 10092 10096 10.1073/pnas.1001139107 20479267
16. In silico zebrafish pattern formation. Caicedo-Carvajal CE, Shinbrot T, Dev Biol 2008 315 2 397 403 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.12.036 18272146
17. Using in silico models to simulate dual perturbation experiments: procedure development and interpretation of outcomes. Jamshidi N, Palsson BO, BMC Syst Biol 2009 3 44 10.1186/1752-0509-3-44 19405968
18. Systems biology of embryogenesis. Edelman LB, Chandrasekaran S, Price ND, Reprod Fertil Dev 2010 22 1 98 105 10.1071/RD09215 20003850
19. Stem cell biology meets systems biology. Roeder I, Radtke F, Development 2009 136 21 3525 3530 10.1242/dev.040758 19820180
20. Multiscale modeling for biologists. Meier-Schellersheim M, Fraser ID, Klauschen F, Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 2009 1 1 4 14 10.1002/wsbm.33 20448808
21. Emergent dynamics of thymocyte development and lineage determination. Efroni S, Harel D, Cohen IR, PLoS Comput Biol 2007 3 1 13 10.1371/journal.pcbi. 0030013 17257050
22. A scenario-based approach to modeling development: a prototype model of C. elegans vulval fate specification. Kam N, Kugler H, Marelly R, Appleby L, Fisher J, Pnueli A, Harel D, Stern MJ, Hubbard EJ, Dev Biol 2008 323 1 1 5 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.07.030 18706404
23. Key role of local regulation in chemosensing revealed by a new molecular interaction-based modeling method. Meier-Schellersheim M, Xu X, Angermann B, Kunkel EJ, Jin T, Germain RN, PLoS Comput Biol 2006 2 7 82 10.1371/journal.pcbi. 0020082 16854213
24. Modeling and computational analysis of EGF receptor-mediated cell communication in Drosophila oogenesis. Shvartsman SY, Muratov CB, Lauffenburger DA, Development 2002 129 11 2577 2589 12015287
25. Quantitative cell biology with the Virtual Cell. Slepchenko BM, Schaff JC, Macara I, Loew LM, Trends Cell Biol 2003 13 11 570 576 10.1016/j.tcb.2003. 09.002 14573350
26. Cellerator: extending a computer algebra system to include biochemical arrows for signal transduction simulations. Shapiro BE, Levchenko A, Meyerowitz EM, Wold BJ, Mjolsness ED, Bioinformatics 2003 19 5 677 678 10.1093/ bioinformatics/btg042 12651737
27. Multiway modeling and analysis in stem cell systems biology. Yener B, Acar E, Aguis P, Bennett K, Vandenberg SL, Plopper GE, BMC Syst Biol 2008 2 63 10.1186/1752-0509-2-63 18625054
28. STORM: a general model to determine the number and adaptive changes of epithelial stem cells in teleost, murine and human intestinal tracts. Wang Z, Matsudaira P, Gong Z, PLoS One 2010 5 11 14063 10.1371/journal.pone.0014063 21124758
29. A single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis. Clayton E, Doupe DP, Klein AM, Winton DJ, Simons BD, Jones PH, Nature 2007 446 7132 185 189 10.1038/nature05574 17330052
30. Intestinal stem cell replacement follows a pattern of neutral drift. Lopez-Garcia C, Klein AM, Simons BD, Winton DJ, Science 2010 330 6005 822 825 10.1126/science.1196236 20929733
31. A dynamic model of proliferation and differentiation in the intestinal crypt based on a hypothetical intraepithelial growth factor. Gerike TG, Paulus U, Potten CS, Loeffler M, Cell Prolif 1998 31 2 93 110 10.1046/j.1365-2184.1998. 00113.x 9745618
32. Cell migration and organization in the intestinal crypt using a lattice-free model. Meineke FA, Potten CS, Loeffler M, Cell Prolif 2001 34 4 253 266 10.1046/j.0960-7722.2001.00216.x 11529883
33. A comprehensive model of the spatio-temporal stem cell and tissue organisation in the intestinal crypt. Buske P, Galle J, Barker N, Aust G, Clevers H, Loeffler M, PLoS Comput Biol 2011 7 1 1001045 10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1001045 21253562
34. Modelling cell motility and chemotaxis with evolving surface finite elements. Elliott CM, Stinner B, Venkataraman C, J R Soc Interface 2012 9 76 3027 3044 10.1098/rsif.2012.0276 22675164
35. An agent-based model of cellular dynamics and circadian variability in human endotoxemia. Nguyen TT, Calvano SE, Lowry SF, Androulakis IP, PLoS One 2013 8 1 55550 10.1371/journal.pone.0055550 23383223
36. In silico analysis of cell cycle synchronisation effects in radiotherapy of tumour spheroids. Kempf H, Hatzikirou H, Bleicher M, Meyer-Hermann M, PLoS Comput Biol 2013 9 11 1003295 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003295 24244120
37. Computational modeling of the mechanical modulation of the growth plate by sustained loading. Narvaez-Tovar CA, Garzon-Alvarado DA, Theor Biol Med Model 2012 9 41 10.1186/1742-4682-9-41 23009361
38. A simple model for estimating the active reactions of embryonic tissues to a deforming mechanical force. Mansurov AN, Stein AA, Beloussov LV, Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2012 11 8 1123 1136 10.1007/s10237-012-0439-y 22972368
39. Explaining a complex living system: dynamics, multi-scaling and emergence. Cohen IR, Harel D, J R Soc Interface 2007 4 13 175 182 10.1098/rsif.2006.0173 17251153
40. A Turing-like test for biological modeling. Harel D, Nat Biotechnol 2005 23 4 495 496 10.1038/nbt0405-495 15815679
41. Biology as reactivity. Fisher J, Harel D, Henzinger TA, Commun Acm 2011 54 10 72 82 10.1145/2001269.2001289
42. Executable cell biology. Fisher J, Henzinger TA, Nat Biotechnol 2007 25 11 1239 1249 10.1038/nbt1356 17989686
43. Multi-scale computational modeling of developmental biology. Setty Y, Bioinformatics 2012 28 15 2022 2028 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts307 22628522
44. Four-dimensional realistic modeling of pancreatic organogenesis. Setty Y, Cohen IR, Dor Y, Harel D, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008 105 51 20374 20379 10.1073/pnas.0808725105 19091945
45. A model of stem cell population dynamics: in silico analysis and in vivo validation. Setty Y, Dalfo D, Korta DZ, Hubbard EJ, Kugler H, Development 2012 139 1 47 56 10.1242/dev.067512 22147952
46. How neurons migrate: a dynamic in-silico model of neuronal migration in the developing cortex. Setty Y, Chen CC, Secrier M, Skoblov N, Kalamatianos D, Emmott S, BMC Syst Biol 2011 5 1 154 10.1186/1752-0509-5-154 21962057
47. Cellular plasticity within the pancreas-lessons learned from development. Puri S, Hebrok M, Dev Cell 2010 18 3 342 356 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.005 20230744
48. Independent requirement for ISL1 in formation of pancreatic mesenchyme and islet cells. Ahlgren U, Pfaff SL, Jessell TM, Edlund T, Edlund H, Nature 1997 385 6613 257 260 10.1038/385257a0 9000074
49. BETA2 and pancreatic islet development. Chu K, Nemoz-Gaillard E, Tsai MJ, Recent Prog Horm Res 2001 56 23 46 10.1210/rp.56.1.23 11237215
50. Islet dynamics: a glimpse at beta cell proliferation. Yesil P, Lammert E, Histol Histopathol 2008 23 7 883 895 18437687
51. Pancreatic cell lineage analyses in mice. Herrera PL, Nepote V, Delacour A, Endocrine 2002 19 3 267 278 10.1385/ENDO:19:3:267 12624426
52. The morphogenesis of the pancreatic mesenchyme is uncoupled from that of the pancreatic epithelium in IPF1/PDX1-deficient mice. Ahlgren U, Jonsson J, Edlund H, Development 1996 122 5 1409 1416 8625829
53. Growth-limiting role of endothelial cells in endoderm development. Sand FW, Hornblad A, Johansson JK, Loren C, Edsbagge J, Stahlberg A, Magenheim J, Ilovich O, Mishani E, Dor Y, et al. Dev Biol 2011 352 2 267 277 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.01.026 21281624
54. Epithelial: Endothelial cross-talk regulates exocrine differentiation in developing pancreas. Pierreux CE, Cordi S, Hick AC, Achouri Y, Ruiz de Almodovar C, Prevot PP, Courtoy PJ, Carmeliet P, Lemaigre FP, Dev Biol 2010 347 1 216 227 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.08.024 20807526
55. Blood vessels restrain pancreas branching, differentiation and growth. Magenheim J, Ilovich O, Lazarus A, Klochendler A, Ziv O, Werman R, Hija A, Cleaver O, Mishani E, Keshet E, et al. Development 2011 138 21 4743 4752 10.1242/dev.066548 21965615
56. Scratching the niche that controls Caenorhabditis elegans germline stem cells. Byrd DT, Kimble J, Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009 20 9 1107 1113 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.09.005 19765664
57. The regulatory network controlling the proliferation-meiotic entry decision in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line. Hansen D, Schedl T, Curr Top Dev Biol 2006 76 185 215 17118267
58. Controls of germline stem cells, entry into meiosis, and the sperm/oocyte decision in Caenorhabditis elegans. Kimble J, Crittenden SL, Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2007 23 405 433 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123326 17506698
59. Trekking across the brain: the journey of neuronal migration. Ayala R, Shu T, Tsai LH, Cell 2007 128 1 29 43 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.021 17218253
60. The multipolar stage and disruptions in neuronal migration. LoTurco JJ, Bai J, Trends Neurosci 2006 29 7 407 413 10.1016/j.tins.2006.05.006 16713637
61. LIS1 RNA interference blocks neural stem cell division, morphogenesis, and motility at multiple stages. Tsai JW, Chen Y, Kriegstein AR, Vallee RB, J Cell Biol 2005 170 6 935 945 10.1083/jcb.200505166 16144905
62. Heterotopia formation in rat but not mouse neocortex after RNA interference knockdown of DCX. Ramos RL, Bai J, LoTurco JJ, Cereb Cortex 2006 16 9 1323 1331 16292002