Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: Initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2067-2073

  Bluekens, Adriana M J ^a,b   Karssemeijer, Nico ^c   Beijerinck, David ^d   Deurenberg, Jan J M ^d   Van Engen, Ruben E ^a   Broeders, Mireille J M ^a,c   Den Heeten, Gerard J ^a,e  

^a National Expert and Training Centre for Breast Cancer Screening   (Netherlands)

^b CPRLab   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d Preventicon Screening Centre/Mid West   (Netherlands)

^e ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Digital mammography; Mass screening; Referral rate; Training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASS SCREENING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PREVALENCE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 77957935308     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1786-7     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Tabar L, Yen M, Vitak B, Chen H, Smith R, Duffy S (2003) Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 361:1405-1410
2. Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CW, Broeders MJ, Boer R, Hendriks JH et al (2003) Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breastcancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet 361:1411-1417
3. Bick U, Diekmann F (2007) Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know? Eur Radiol 17:1931-1942
4. Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screenfilm mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomised trial in a population-based screening program-Oslo II study. Radiology 232:197-204
5. Rosselli Del Turco M, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, Bonardi R, Martinelli F, Lazzari B et al (2007) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR 189:860-866
6. Heddson B, Ronnow K, Olsson M, Miller D (2007) Digital versus screenfilm mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. Eur J Radiol 64:419-425
7. Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P (2008) Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study. Eur Radiol 18:183-191
8. Hambly N, Phelan N, Hargaden G, O'Doherty A, Flanagan F (2008) Impact of digital mammography in breast cancer screening: initial experience in a national breast screening program. In: Krupinski EA (ed) IWDM 2008. Lecture notes in computer scince, vol 5116. Springer, Berlin, pp 55-60
9. Sala M, Comas M, Macià F, Martinez J, Casamitjana M, Castells X (2009) Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection. Radiology 252:31-39. doi:10.1148/radiol.2521080696
10. Vinnicombe S, Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, Shiel S, Perry N, Dos Santos Silva IM (2009) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. Radiology 251:347-358
11. Karssemeijer N, Bluekens A, Broeders M, Deurenberg J, Beekman M, Visser R, Van Engen R, Bartels-Kortland A, Beijerinck D (2009) Breast cancer screening results five years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 253:353-358
12. Holland R, Rijken H, Hendriks J (2007) The Dutch population-based mammography screening: 30-year experience. Breast Care 2:12-18
13. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773-1783
14. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E (2002) Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol 12:2679-2683
15. Roelofs AA, Karssemeijer N, Wedekind N, Beck C, van Woudenberg S, Snoeren PR, Hendriks JH, Rosselli del Turco M, Bjurstam N, Junkermann H, Beijerinck D, Séradour B, Evertsz CJ (2007) Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening. Radiology 242:70-77
16. Taylor P, Potts HW (2008) Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur J Cancer 44:798-807