Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a populationbased screening program

Radiology

Volumn 253, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 353-358

  Karssemeijer, Nico ^a,b   Bluekens, Adriana M ^b   Beijerinck, David ^c   Deurenberg, Jan J ^c   Beekman, Matthijs ^c   Visser, Roelant ^b   Van Engen, Ruben ^b   Bartels Kortland, Annemieke ^c   Broeders, Mireille J ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b National Expert and Training Centre for Breast Cancer Screening   (Netherlands)

^c Preventicon   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SCREEN FILM MAMMOGRAPHY;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 77950134714     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2532090225     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4945 paired examinations. Radiology 2001;218(3):873-880.
2. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353(17):1773-1783.
3. Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A. Populationbased mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: the Oslo I study. Radiology 2003;229(3):877-884.
4. Heddson B, Ronnow K, Olsson M, Miller D. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. Eur J Radiol 2007;64(3): 419-425.
5. Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, et al. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189(4):860-866.
6. Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in populationbased screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 2007;244(3): 708-717.
7. Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study. Eur Radiol 2008;18(1):183-191.
8. Skaane P. Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review. Acta Radiol 2009;50(1):3-14.
9. Roelofs AA, Karssemeijer N, Wedekind N, et al. Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening. Radiology 2007;242(1):70-77.
10. Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Beemsterboer PM, et al. Nation-wide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995 National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Cancer 1998; 75(5):694-698.
11. Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH, et al. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97(10):748 -754.
12. Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 2008; 246(2):376 -383.
13. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Vitak B, et al. The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(12): 1755-1760.
14. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008;359(16): 1675-1684.