Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography: Results of a prospective clinical trial

European Radiology

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1360-1366

  Van Ongeval, Chantal ^a   Bosmans, H ^a   Van Steen, A ^a   Joossens, K ^a   Celis, V ^a   Van Goethem, M ^b   Verslegers, I ^b   Nijs, K ^a   Rogge, F ^a   Marchal, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Breast radiography comparative studies; Digital mammography; Image display; Image processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AXILLA; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPRESSION; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL IMAGING; FEMALE; FILM; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RADIOLOGIST; SCORING SYSTEM; SKIN; THORAX;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFACTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 33744783985     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0134-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Yaffe MJ (2000) Digital mammography. In: Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Metter RL (eds) Handbook of medical imaging, physics and psychophysics, vol. 1. SPIE, Bellingham, WA
2. James JJ (2004) The current status of digital mammography. Clin Radiol 59:1-10
3. Noel A, Thibault F (2004) Digital detectors for mammography: The technical challenges. Eur Radiol 14:1990-1998
4. American College of Radiology (ACR) (2004) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia
5. Vuylsteke P, Schoeters E (1994) Multiscale image contrast amplification (MUSICA). Proc SPIE 2167:551-560
6. Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Munzel U, Baum F, Grabbe E (2002) Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: Image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions. Eur Radiol 12:1697-1702
7. Cole EB, Pisano ED, Kistner EO (2003) Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem- solving mammography: Effects of image processing and lesion type. Radiology 226:153-160
8. Pisano ED, Cole EB, Hemminger BM, Jaffe MJ (2000) Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: A pictorial essay. Radiographics 20:1479-1491
9. Lewin FM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, Isaacs MF (2001) Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 218:873-880
10. Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A (2003) Population-based mammography screening: Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - the Oslo I study. Radiology 229:877-884
11. Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening program - the Oslo II Study. Radiology 232:197-204
12. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, van Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E (2002) Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: Full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol 12:2679-2683
13. Matzek WK, Pfarf G (2004) Digital storage phosphor mammography versus direct full field digital mammography for detection of breast cancer. Eur Radiol ECR report B-036, ECR 2004. Vol 14 Suppl 2, Feb 2004
14. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, D'Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M (2005) Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773-1783
15. Quam JP, Ackerman SJ (2003) Conspicuity and characterization of findings on computed radiography for mammography vs screen-film mammography: results from a prospective clinical trial. RSNA report no. 544