Does Validation During Language Comprehension Depend on an Evaluative Mindset?

Discourse Processes

Volumn 51, Issue 1-2, 2014, Pages 7-25

  Isberner, Maj Britt ^a   Richter, Tobias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891927965     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2013.855867     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Albrecht, J. E. and O'Brien, E. J. 1993. Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19: 1061 - 1070.
2. Appel, M. and Richter, T. 2007. Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology, 10: 113 - 134.
3. Barton, S. B. and Sanford, A. J. 1993. A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition, 21: 477 - 487.
4. Bohan, J. and Sanford, A. 2008. Semantic anomalies at the borderline of consciousness: An eye-tracking investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61: 232 - 239.
5. Bottoms, H. C., Eslick, A. N. and Marsh, E. J. 2010. Memory and the Moses illusion: Failures to detect contradictions with stored knowledge yield negative memorial consequences. Memory, 18: 670 - 678.
6. Bredart, S. and Modolo, K. 1988. Moses strikes again: Focalization effect on a semantic illusion. Acta Psychologica, 67: 135 - 144.
7. Connell, L. and Keane, M. T. 2006. A model of plausibility. Cognitive Science, 30: 95 - 120.
8. Erickson, T. A. and Mattson, M. E. 1981. From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20: 540 - 552.
9. Fazio, L. K., Barber, S. J., Rajaram, S., Ornstein, P. A., & Marsh, E. J. (2013). Creating illusions of knowledge: Learning errors that contradict prior knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1-5
10. Fazio, L. K. and Marsh, E. J. 2008. Slowing presentation speed increases illusions of knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15: 180 - 185.
11. Fischler, I. and Bloom, P. A. 1980. Rapid processing of the meaning of sentences. Memory & Cognition, 8: 216 - 225.
12. Fischler, I., Bloom, P. A., Childers, D. G., Roucos, S. E. and Perry, N. W. 1983. Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. Psychophysiology, 20: 400 - 409.
13. Fischler, I., Childers, D. G., Achariyapaopan, T. and Perry, N. W. 1985. Brain potentials during sentence verification-automatic aspects of comprehension. Biological Psychology, 21: 83 - 105.
14. Gerrig, R. J. and Prentice, D. A. 1991. The representation of fictional information. Psychological Science, 2: 336 - 340.
15. Gilbert, D. T. 1991. How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46: 107 - 119.
16. Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S. and Malone, P. S. 1990. Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 601 - 613.
17. Gilbert, D. T., Tafarodi, R. W. and Malone, P. S. 1993. You can't not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 221 - 233.
18. Green, M. C. and Brock, T. C. 2000. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 701 - 721.
19. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M. and Petersson, K. M. 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304: 438 - 441.
20. Herbert, C. and Kübler, A. 2011. Dogs cannot bark: Event-related brain responses to true and false negated statements as indicators of higher-order conscious processing. PloS One, 6: e25574
21. Isberner, M.-B. and Richter, T. 2013. Can readers ignore implausibility? Evidence for nonstrategic monitoring of event-based plausibility in language comprehension. Acta Psychologica, 142: 15 - 22.
22. Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23. Kintsch, W. 1980. " Semantic memory: A tutorial ". In Attention and performance VIII, Edited by: Nickerson, R. 595 - 620. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Kounios, J., Osman, A. M. and Meyer, D. E. 1987. Structure and process in semantic memory: New evidence based on speed-accuracy decomposition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116: 3 - 25.
25. Kutas, M. and Federmeier, K. D. 2011. Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62: 621 - 647.
26. MacLeod, C. M. 1991. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109: 163 - 203.
27. Marsh, E. J. and Fazio, L. K. 2006. Learning errors from fiction: Difficulties in reducing reliance on fictional stories. Memory & Cognition, 34: 1140 - 1149.
28. Marsh, E. J., Meade, M. L. and Roediger, H. L., III. 2003. Learning facts from fiction. Journal of Memory and Language, 49: 519 - 536.
29. Morey, R. D. 2008. Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4: 61 - 64.
30. Murray, W. S. and Rowan, M. 1998. Early, mandatory, pragmatic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27: 1 - 22.
31. Nieuwland, M. S. and Kuperberg, G. R. 2008. When the truth is not too hard to handle: An event-related potential study on the pragmatics of negation. Psychological Science, 19: 1213 - 1218.
32. Nieuwland, M. S. and van Berkum, J. J. A. 2006. When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18: 1098 - 1111.
33. O'Brien, E., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E. and Halleran, J. G. 1998. Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24: 1200 - 1210.
34. Pickering, M. J. and Traxler, M. J. 1998. Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24: 940 - 961.
35. Rapp, D. N. 2008. How do readers handle incorrect information during reading?. Memory & Cognition, 36: 688 - 701.
36. Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B. J. and Liversedge, S. P. 2004. The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30: 1290 - 1301.
37. Richter, T., Schroeder, S. and Wöhrmann, B. 2009. You don't have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96: 538 - 558.
38. Sanford, A. J. 2002. Context, attention and depth of processing during interpretation. Mind & Language, 17: 188 - 206.
39. Sanford, A. J. and Garrod, S. C. 2005. Memory-based approaches and beyond. Discourse Processes, 39: 205 - 224.
40. Sanford, A. J. and Graesser, A. C. 2006. Shallow processing and underspecification. Discourse Processes, 42: 99 - 108.
41. Sanford, A. J., Leuthold, H., Bohan, J. and Sanford, A. J. 2011. Anomalies at the borderline of awareness: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23: 514 - 523.
42. Schroeder, S., Richter, T. and Hoever, I. 2008. Getting a picture that is both accurate and stable: Situation models and epistemic validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 59: 237 - 259.
43. Schul, Y., Mayo, R. and Burnstein, E. 2004. Encoding under trust and distrust: The spontaneous activation of incongruent cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86: 668 - 679.
44. Singer, M. 1993. Causal bridging inferences: Validating consistent and inconsistent sequences. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47: 340 - 359.
45. Singer, M. 2006. Verification of text ideas during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 54: 574 - 591.
46. Singer, M., Halldorson, M., Lear, J. C. and Andrusiak, P. 1992. Validation of causal bridging inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 31: 507 - 524.
47. Speer, S. R. and Clifton, C. Jr. 1998. Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 26: 965 - 978.
48. Staub, A., Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J. and Majewski, H. 2007. The time course of plausibility effects on eye movements in reading: Evidence from noun-noun compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33: 1162 - 1169.
49. Stroop, J. R. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18: 643 - 662.
50. Traxler, M. J. and Pickering, M. J. 1996. Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory & Language, 35: 454 - 475.
51. Umanath, S., Butler, A. C. and Marsh, E. J. 2012. Positive and negative effects of monitoring popular films for historical inaccuracies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26: 556 - 567.
52. van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwitserlood, P., Hagoort, P. and Brown, C. M. 2003. When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17: 701 - 718.
53. van Gompel, R. P., Pickering, M. J. and Traxler, M. J. 2001. Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence against current constraint-based and two-stage models. Journal of Memory and Language, 45: 225 - 258.
54. West, R. F. and Stanovich, K. E. 1982. Source of inhibition in experiments on the effect of sentence context on word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8: 385 - 399.
55. Wiswede, D., Koranyi, N., Müller, F., Langner, O., & Rothermund, K. (2013). Validating the truth of propositions: Behavioral and ERP indicators of truth evaluation processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 647-653
56. Zwaan, R. A. and Radvansky, G. A. 1998. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123: 162 - 185.