Anomalies at the borderline of awareness: An ERP study

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 514-523

  Sanford, Anthony J ^a   Leuthold, Hartmut ^a   Bohan, Jason ^a   Sanford, Alison J S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; EGO DEVELOPMENT; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AWARENESS; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME;

EID: 78650412623     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21370     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbroek, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX database. [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Barton, S. B., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). A case-study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition, 21, 477-487.
3. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.14) [Computer program]. Retrieved from www.praat.org/ on 13 May 2005.
4. Bohan, J., & Sanford, A. J. (2008). Anomaly detection at the borderline of consciousness: An eyetracking study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 232-239.
5. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59, 55-73.
6. Brédart, S., & Modolo, K. (1988). Moses strikes again: Focalisation effect on a semantic illusion. Acta Psychologica, 67, 135-144.
7. Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A., & Just, M. A. (1995). Language comprehension: Sentence and discourse processing. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 91-121.
8. Daneman, M., Lennertz, T., & Hannon, B. (2007). Shallow semantic processing of text: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 85-105.
9. Daneman, M., Reingold, E. M., & Davidson, M. (1995). Time course of phonological activation during reading: Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 884-898.
10. DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117-1121.
11. Erickson, T. D., & Matteson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behaviour, 20, 540-551.
12. Fernandez-Duque, D., Grossi, G., Thornton, I. M., & Neville, H. J. (2003). Representation of change: Separate electrophysiological markers of attention, awareness, and implicit processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 491-507.
13. Ferreira, F., Ferraro, V., & Bailey, K. G. D. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11-15.
14. Filik, R., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Processing local pragmatic anomalies in fictional contexts: Evidence from the N400. Psychophysiology, 45, 554-558.
15. Filik, R., Sanford, A. J., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Processing pronouns without antecedents: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1315-1326.
16. Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1983). Topic dependent effects in language processing. In G. B. Flores d'Arcais & R. Jarvella (Eds.), The process of language comprehension (pp. 271-296). Chichester: Wiley.
17. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518-1530.
18. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP-measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
19. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 273-316). New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438-441.
21. Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). Susceptibility to semantic illusions: An individual-differences perspective. Memory & Cognition, 29, 449-461.
22. Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2004). Shallow semantic processing of text: An individual-differences account. Discourse Processes, 37, 187-204.
23. Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., & Doedens, G. (2004). Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 59-73.
24. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended object and natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136.
25. Ille, N., Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (2002). Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 19, 113-124.
26. Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 205-225.
27. Kimura, M., Katayama, J., & Ohira, H. (2008). Event-related brain potential evidence for implicit change detection: A replication of Fernandez-Duque et al. (2003). Neuroscience Letters, 448, 236-239.
28. Kolk, H. H. J., Chwilla, D. J., van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 85, 1-36.
29. Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23-49.
30. Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 117-129.
31. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463-470.
32. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
33. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161-163.
34. Kutas, M., van Petten, C. K., & Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholingusitics electrified II. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 659-724). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
35. Leuthold, H., & Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263-269.
36. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
37. Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2005). Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 691-701.
38. Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2008). The neurocognition of referential ambiguity in language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 603-630.
39. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785-806.
40. Reder, L. M., & Kusbit, G. W. (1991). Locus of the Moses Illusion: Imperfect encoding, retrieval or match? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 385-406.
41. Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., & Hennighausen, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology, 38, 165-174.
42. Sanford, A. J., Filik, R., Emmott, C., & Morrow, I. (2008). They're digging up the road again: The processing cost of Institutional They. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 372-380.
43. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1998). The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 26, 159-190.
44. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (2005). Memory-based processing and beyond. Discourse Processes, 39, 205-224.
45. Sanford, A. J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 382-386.
46. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
47. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443-467.
48. Van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 657-671.
49. Van de Meerendonk, N., Kolk, H. H. J., Chwilla, D. J., & Vissers, C. Th. W. M. (2009). Monitoring in language perception. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 1211-1224.
50. Van Herten, M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2006). When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1181-1197.
51. Van Oostendorp, H., & De Mul, S. (1990). Moses beats Adam: A semantic relatedness effect on a semantic illusion. Acta Psychologica, 74, 35-46.
52. Vissers, C. Th. W. M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2007). The interplay of heuristic parsing routines in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and reaction times. Biological Psychology, 75, 8-18.
53. Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., & Shapiro, K. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1656-1674.