Evaluation of the use of digital study models in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 62-67

  Shastry, Shruti ^a   Park, Jae Hyun ^a,b  

^a A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Digital models; Postgraduate orthodontic programs; Study models

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ARTICULATOR; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTICS; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CANADA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA DISPLAY; DENTAL ARTICULATORS; DENTAL MODELS; EDUCATION, DENTAL, GRADUATE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; ORTHODONTICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TEACHING; TEACHING MATERIALS; TECHNOLOGY, DENTAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84891907890     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/030813-197.1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH. Vogels DS 3rd. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2008;42: 625-640.
2. Goonewardene RW, Goonewardene MS, Razza JM, Murray K. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models. Aust Orthod J. 2008;24:83-90.
3. Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod. 2009; 36:36-41.
4. Favero L, Terrazzani C, Favero V, Stellini E, Cocilovo F. Virtual study models: a comparison of modular application systems. Prog Orthod. 2009;10:16-25.
5. Peluso M, Josell S, Levine S, Lorei B. Digital models: an introduction. Semin Orthod. 2004;10:226-238.
6. Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod. 2003;30:219-223.
7. Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod. 2005;75: 300-304.
8. Whetten JL, Williamson PC, Heo G, Varnhagen C, Major PW. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:485-491.
9. Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Evans CA, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:51-56.
10. Mayers M, Firestone AR, Rashid R, Vig KW. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:431-434.
11. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124: 101-105.
12. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:301-306.
13. Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C, et al. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:589-595.
14. Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142: 269-273.
15. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:161-164.
16. Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer JR JR. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:351-357.
17. Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:346-352.
18. Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011; 14:1-16.
19. Gracco A, Buranello M, Cozzani M, Siciliani G. Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and times. Prog Orthod. 2007;8:252-259.
20. Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:298-303.
21. Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod. 2009; 36:36-41.
22. Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:308-313.
23. Luu NS, Nikolcheva LG, Retrouvey JM, et al. Linear measurements using virtual study models. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:1098-1106.
24. The American Board of Orthodontics. Case Preparation. St Louis: The American Board ofOrthodontics, Available at: http://www.americanboardortho.com/ professionals/clinicalexam/casereportpresentation/preparation/casts.aspx. Accessed December 31, 2012.
25. Hildebrand JC, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Sivik M, Hans M. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:283-289.
26. Costalos PA, Sarraf K, Cangialosi TJ, Efstratiadis S. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128: 624-629.
27. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:794-803.
28. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH. Vogels DS 3rd. 2011 JCO orthodontic practice study. Part 1: trends. J Clin Orthod. 2011;45:535-544.
29. The American Board of Orthodontics, Examination Process. Available at: http://www.americanboardortho.com/professionals/clinicalexam/examprocess2.aspx - 1. Accessed December 31, 2012.