Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 301-306

  Zilberman, Oded ^a   Huggare, Jan Å V ^a   Parikakis, Konstantinos A ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dental models; Diagnostic errors; Observer variation; OrthoCAD; Orthodontics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER MODEL; HUMAN; ORTHODONTICS; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH SIZE; VIRTUAL REALITY; CALIBRATION; CANINE TOOTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DENTAL CARE; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; MALOCCLUSION; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ODONTOMETRY; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH; VALIDATION STUDY;

CALIBRATION; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CUSPID; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION; MOLAR; ODONTOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 0042883742     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Proffit WR, Ackerman JL. Orthodontic diagnosis: the development of a problem list. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, eds. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000: 165-170.
2. Binder RE, Cohen SM. Clinical evaluation of tooth-size discrepancy. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32:544-546.
3. Sheridan JJ. The reader's corner. J Clin Orthod. 2000;34:593-597.
4. Shellhart WC, Lange DW, Kluemper GT, Hicks EP, Kaplan AL. Reliability of the Bolton tooth-size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:327-334.
5. Champagne M. Reliability of measurements from photocopies of study models. J Clin Orthod. 1992;26:648-650.
6. Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:676-680.
7. Lowey MN. The development of a new method of cephalometric and study cast mensuration with a computer controlled, video image capture system. Part II: study cast mensuration. Br J Orthod. 1993;20:315-331.
8. Romeo A. Holograms in orthodontics: a universal system for the production, development, and illumination of holograms for the storage and analysis of dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:443-447.
9. Mok KH, Cooke MS. Space analysis: a comparison between sonic digitization (DigiGraph Workstation) and the digital caliper. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:653-661.
10. Rossouw PE, Benatar M, Stander I, Wynchank S. A critical comparison of three methods for measuring dental models. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1991;46:223-226.
11. Ryden H, Bjelkhagen H, Martensson B. Tooth position measurements on dental casts using holographic images. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:310-313.
12. Yamamoto K, Toshimitsu A, Mikami T, Hayashi S, Harada R, Nakamura S. Optical measurement of dental cast profile and application to analysis of three-dimensional tooth movement in orthodontics. Front Med Biol Eng. 1989;1:119-130.
13. Yamamoto K, Hayashi S, Nishikawa H, Nakamura S, Mikami T. Measurements of dental cast profile and three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. Trans Biomed Eng. 1991;38:360-365.
14. Kuroda T, Motohashi N, Tominaga R, Iwata K. Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:365-369.
15. Wakabayashi K, Sohmura T, Takahashi J, Kojima T, Akao T, Nakamura T, Takashima F, Maruyama T. Development of the computerized dental cast form analyzing system - three dimensional diagnosis of dental arch form and the investigation of measuring condition. Dent Mater J. 1997;16:180-190.
16. Alcaniz M, Montserrat C, Grau V, Chinesta F, Ramon A, Albalat S. An advanced system for the simulation and planning of orthodontic treatment. Med Image Anal. 1998;2:61-77.
17. Motohashi N, Kuroda T. A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:263-274.
18. Sohmura T, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K, Takahashi J. Use of an ultra-high-speed laser scanner for constructing three-dimensional shapes of dentition and occlusion. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:345-352.
19. Commer P, Bourauel C, Maier K, Jager A. Construction and testing of a computer-based intraoral laser scanner for determining tooth positions. Med Eng Phys. 2000;22:625-635.
20. Marcel TJ. Three-dimensional on-screen virtual models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:666-668.
21. Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer JR, Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:351-357.
22. Hunter WS, Priest P. Errors and discrepancies in measurements of tooth size. J Dent Res. 1960;39:405-414.
23. Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd; 1940: 122-132.
24. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:382-390.
25. Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1958;28:113-130.
26. Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod. 1962;48:504-529.
27. OrthoCAD, USA. Available at: http://www.orthocad.com. Accessed May 16, 2001.
28. Emodel™, USA. Available at: http://www.dentalemodels.com. Accessed June 18, 2001.