Linear measurements using virtual study models: A systematic review

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1098-1106

  Luu, Nghe S ^a   Nikolcheva, Liliya G ^b   Retrouvey, Jean Marc ^c   Flores Mir, Carlos ^a   El Bialy, Tarek ^a   Carey, Jason P ^a   Major, Paul W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b McGill University ^*

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dental models; Imaging; Odontometry; Reproducibility of results; Threedimensional

Indexed keywords

ANATOMIC LANDMARK; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ODONTOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ODONTOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84869837751     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/110311-681.1     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Alcan T, Ceylanoǧlu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:30-36.
2. Asquith J, Gillgrass T, Mossey P. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:517-522.
3. Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C, et al. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:589-595.
4. Cha BK, Choi JI, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Jeong YM. Applications of three-dimensionally scanned models in orthodontics. Int J Comput Dent. 2007;10:41-52.
5. Goonewardene RW, Goonewardene MS, Razza JM, Murray K. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models. Aust Orthod J. 2008;24:83-90.
6. Horton HM, Miller JR, Gaillard PR, Larson BE. Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models. Angle Orthod. 2009;80:254-261.
7. Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod. 2008;35:191-201.
8. Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:346-352.
9. Oosterkamp BC, van der Meer WJ, Rutenfrans M, Dijkstra PU. Reliability of linear measurements on a virtual bilateral cleft lip and palate model. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43: 519-523.
10. Quimby ML, Vig KWL, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:298-303.
11. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124: 101-105.
12. Sjogren AP, Lindgren JE, Huggare JA. Orthodontic study cast analysis\-reproducibility of recordings and agreement between conventional and 3D virtual measurements. J Digit Imaging. 2010;23:482-492.
13. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:794-803.
14. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:301-306.
15. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:16e1-16e4.
16. Miras D, Sander FG. The accuracy of holograms compared to other model measurements [in German]. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1993;54:203-217.
17. Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod. 2003;30:219-223.
18. El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional dental measurements: an alternative to plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:259-265.
19. Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho CT. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J. 2009;25:97-103.
20. Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Miasiro Junior H, Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23:288-295.
21. Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2011;14:1-16.
22. Sutherland SE. Evidence-based dentistry: part I. Getting started. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001;67:204-206.
23. Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method. Eur J Ortho. March 22, 2011, Epub ahead of print.
24. Hu XY, Pan XG, Gao WL, Xiao YM. The reliability and accuracy of the digital models reconstructed by cone-beam computed tomography. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2011; 20:512-516.
25. Wu JC, Huang JN, Xu XJ. A pilot study on the accuracy of digital model reconstructed by cone beam CT. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2010;19:456-469.
26. Mayers M, Firestone AR, Rashid R, Vig KW. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:431-434.
27. Costalos PA, Sarraf K, Cangialosi TJ, Efstratiadis S. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:624-629.
28. Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Evans CA, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:51-56.
29. Hildebrand JC, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Sivik M, Hans M. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:283-289.
30. Veenema AC, Katsaros C, Boxum SC, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Index of complexity, outcome and need scored on plaster and digital models. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:281-286.
31. Redlich M, Weinstock T, Abed Y, Schneor R, Holdstein Y, Fischer A. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11:90-95.