The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 298-303

  Quimby, Meredith L ^a   Vig, Katherine W L ^b   Rashid, Robert G ^b   Firestone, Allen R ^b  

^a Ohio State University ^*

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital models; Effectiveness; Efficacy

Indexed keywords

PLASTIC;

ACCURACY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EVALUATION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MEASUREMENT; PATIENT; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STUDENT T TEST; TOOTH OCCLUSION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 3242659039     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Han KU, Vig KWL, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:212-219.
2. Hunter WS, Priest WR. Errors and discrepancy in measurement of tooth sizes. J Dent Res. 1960;39:405-414.
3. Brook AH, Pitts NB, Yau F, Sandar PK. An image analysis system for the determination of tooth dimensions from study casts: comparison with manual measurements of mesiodistal diameter. J Dent Res. 1986;65:428-431.
4. Champagne M. Reliability of measurements from photocopies of study models. J Clin Orthod. 1992;26:648-650.
5. Mok KHY, Cooke MS. Space analysis: a comparison between sonic digitization (DigigraphTM Workstation) and the digital caliper. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:653-661.
6. Musich DR, Ackerman JL. The canenometer: a reliable device for estimating dental arch perimeter. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1973;63:366-375.
7. Rudge SJ, Jones PT, Bowden DEJ. The reliability of study model measurement in the evaluation of crowding. Br J Orthod. 1983;5:225-231.
8. Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:676-680.
9. Last J. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1988:41.
10. Norman GR, Steiner DL. Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials. London, UK: BC Decker Inc; 1998:94-100.
11. Coleman RM, Hembree JH Jr, Weber FN. Dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:438-446.
12. Johnson GH, Chellis KD, Gordon GE, Lepe X. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immerison. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:446-453.
13. Boden J, Likeman P, Clark R. Some effects of disinfecting solutions on the properties of alginate impression material and dental stone. J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2001;9:131-135.
14. Taylor RL, Wright PS, Maryan C. Disinfection procedures: their effect on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and gypsum casts. Dent Mater. 2002;18:103-110.