Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 130, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 485-491

  Whetten, Joshua L ^a   Williamson, Philip C ^a   Heo, Giseon ^a   Varnhagen, Connie ^a   Major, Paul W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33749448868     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.022     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kuroda T., Motohashi N., Tominaga R., and Iwata K. Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110 (1996) 365-369
2. Kusnoto B., and Evans C.A. Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122 (2002) 342-348
3. Sohmura T., Kohjima T., Wakabayashi K., and Takahashi J. Use of an ultrahigh-speed laser scanner for constructing three-dimesional shapes of dentition and occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 84 (2000) 345-352
4. Motohashi N., and Kuroda T. A 3-D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 21 (1999) 263-274
5. Santoro M., Galkin S., Teredesai M., Nicolay O., and Cangialosi T. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003) 101-105
6. Tomassetti J.J., Taloumis L.J., Denny J.M., and Fischer Jr. J.R. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 71 (2001) 351-357
7. Zilberman O., Huggare J., and Parikakis K. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 73 (2003) 301-306
8. Stevens D. Clinical use of virtual study models versus traditional plaster study models for orthodontic treatment diagnosis [thesis] (2004), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 79
9. Lee R., MacFarlane T., and O'Brien K. Consistency of orthodontic treatment planning decisions. Clin Orthod Res 2 (1999) 79-84
10. Richmond S., O'Brien K.D., Roberts C.T., and Andrews M. Dentists variation in the determination of orthodontic treatment need. Br J Orthod 21 (1994) 65-68
11. Baumrind S., Korn E.L., Boyd R.L., and Maxwell R. The decision to extract: part 1-interclinician agreement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109 (1996) 297-309
12. Ribarevski R., Vig P., Vig K.D., Weyant R., and O'Brien K. Consistency of orthodontic extraction decisions. Eur J Orthod 18 (1996) 77-80
13. Pair J., Luke L., White S., Atchinson K., Englehart R., and Brennan R. Variability of study cast assessment among orthodontists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120 (2001) 629-638
14. Firestone A., Beck F., Beglin F., and Vig K. Validity of the index of complexity, outcome, and need (ICON) in determining orthodontic treatment need. Angle Orthod 72 (2002) 15-20
15. Keeling S.D., McGorray S., Wheeler T.T., and King G.J. Imprecision in orthodontic diagnosis: reliability of clinical measures of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 66 (1996) 381-391
16. Ellis P.E., and Benson P.E. Does articulating study casts make a difference to treatment planning?. J Orthod 30 (2003) 45-49
17. Han U.K., Vig K.W., Weintraub J.A., Vig P.S., and Kowalski C.J. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 100 (1991) 212-219
18. Greenhill R., and Basford K. The effects of varying diagnostic records on subjective orthodontic treatment priority assessments. Aust Orthod J 6 (1979) 55-63
19. Zar J. Multisample hypothesis: paired-sample hypotheses. In: Zar J. (Ed). Biostatistical analysis. 3rd ed. (1996), Prentice-Hall, Toronto 173
20. Mandall N.A. Are photographic records reliable for orthodontic screening?. J Orthod 29 (2002) 125-127
21. Thomas P.M. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery in the treatment of mandibular deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53 (1995) 579-587
22. Proffit W.R., Phillips C., and Dann C.T. Who seeks surgical-orthodontic treatment?. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 5 (1990) 153-160
23. Weaver N. Age limitation on provision of orthopedic therapy and orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 156-164