Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: Reliability and validity

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 589-595

  Bootvong, K ^a   Liu, Z ^a   McGrath, C ^a   Hagg U ^a   Wong, Ricky W K ^a   Bendeus, M ^a   Yeung, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODONTOMETRY; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH ARCH; VALIDATION STUDY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODONTOMETRY; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77957775917     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp159     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Asquith J, Gillgrass T, Mossey P. 2007 Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. European Journal of Orthodontics 29: 517-522
2. Bell A, Ayoub A, Siebert P. 2003 Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. Journal of Orthodontics 30: 219-223
3. Björk A, Krebs A, Solow B 1964 A method for epidemiological registration of malocclusion. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 22: 27-41
4. Cochran J et al. 2004 A standardized photographic method for evaluating enamel opacities including fluorosis. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 32: (Suppl 1)19-27
5. Cohen J 1960 A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1: 37-46
6. Cohen J 1988 Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillside
7. Colton T 1974 Statistics in medicine. Little Brown and Company, Boston
8. Costalos P, Sarraf K, Cangialosi T, Efstratiadis S. 2005 Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 128: 624-629
9. DeLong R, Heinzen M, Hodges J, Ko C, Douglas W. 2003 Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arch. Journal of Dental Research 82: 438-442
10. Fleiss J 1971 Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76: 378-382
11. Hunter W, Priest W. 1960 Errors and discrepancy in measurement of tooth sizes. Journal of Dental Research 39: 405-414
12. Lee S, Delong P R, Hodges J S, Hayashi K, Lee J B 2008 Predicting first molar width using virtual models of dental arches. Clinical Anatomy 21: 27-32
13. Lewis B R, Stern M R, Willmot D R 2008 Maxillary anterior tooth size and arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 45: 639-646
14. Mayers M, Firestone A, Rashid R, Vig K. 2005 Comparison of Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 128: 431-434
15. Mitchell D, Mitchell L. 2005 Oxford handbook of clinical dentistry, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York
16. Mok C W, Zhou L, McGrath C, Hägg U, Bendeus M. 2007 Digital images as an alternative to orthodontic casts in assessing malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 65: 362-368
17. Mullen S, Martin C, Ngan P, Gladwin M. 2007 Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 132: 346-352
18. Okunami T, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Evans C, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. 2007 Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 131: 51-56
19. Paredes V, Gandia J, Cibrian R. 2006 Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios by digitization, and comparison with the traditional method. European Journal of Orthodontics 28: 120-125
20. Petrie A 2002 Further statistical in dentistry. British Dental Association, London
21. Quimby M, Vig K, Rashid R, Firestone A. 2004 The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthodontist 74: 298-303
22. Roberts C T, Richmond S. 1997 The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics. British Journal of Orthodontics 24: 139-147
23. Sandler P J, Murray A M, Bearn D. 2002 Digital records in orthodontics. Dental Update 29: 18-24
24. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay O F, Cangialosi T J 2003 Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 124: 101-105
25. Shrout P E, Fleiss J L 1979 Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86: 420-428
26. Stephens C, Bowden D. 1993 Examination of the patient. In: Shaw W C (ed). Orthodontics and occlusal management. Wright, Oxford., pp. 83-99.
27. Stevens D R, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud D W, Heo G, Major P W 2006 Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of Peer Assessment Rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 129: 794-803
28. Terai H, Shimahara M, Sakinaka Y, Tajima S. 1999 Accuracy of integration of dental casts in three-dimensional models. Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery 57: 662-665
29. Whetten J, Williamson P, Heo G, Varnhagen C, Major P. 2006 Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patient between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 130: 485-491
30. Wong H M, McGrath C, Lo E C, King N M 2005 Photographs as a means of assessing developmental defects of enamel. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 33: 438-446
31. Zilberman O, Huggare J, Parikakis K. 2003 Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthodontist 73: 301-306